It took me a long while to finish reading this book, because sometimes I simply couldn't stomach Rutherford's writing.
Why did I read this book, then? I read this book because I wanted to be fair to Rutherford. In 2014, I was able to purchase 30 Years a Watchtower Slave from a book sale. It was written by an ex-JW member, and he described the harrowing experiences of a lowly member during that time. I knew I only had one aspect of the problem, and so I sought to read the work of his opponent, who was J. F. Rutherford.
Riches was published by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, which is the publishing arm of the Jehovah's Witnesses. It was the first book of his that I was able to obtain, and so I read it. I'm not the person who lambastes a work simply because I disagree with it. Although sometimes it's a waste of time, reading books from start to finish have been more rewarding than not.
Riches is a poor example of JW literature. That's probably the reason why most, if not all, of Rutherford's works have become merely historical curios: his controversial stances have failed to withstand the test of time, and have been debunked by more recent research into Biblical exegesis. His invectives against the Catholic Church were also written in poor taste: he is even unable to defend his answer to the question of theodicy.
Nevertheless, Rutherford still makes some sense in regard to a few of his attacks on the Catholic Church. There are a lot of hypocrites among ourselves, but that's really not limited to only our Church. There are hypocrites in every religion, even atheism. Compared to a more modern work such as Mankind's Search for God, however, Riches is simply a passable book.
I applaud the transition of the JW toward the direction of love and tolerance. It is indeed more Christ-like, and I'm happy to say that Pope Francis is embracing this direction toward love as well.