I tried. I really did. This book of poetry had all the makings of one I'd like. I'm obviously of the same generation and a devotee of the same ouvres as Wicker, though obviously of a different race, because I "got" all of his hip hop, jazz, movie, and other semiotic signposts he planted for us to see.
But, with a few notable exceptions, I didn't like these poems. I found their "hippness" trite and patronizing, if not, to be more cynical, opportunistic. To continue cyncially, I can just imagine editors of various literary magazine receiving poems entitled "Love Letter To Flava Flav," and "Love Letter To Justin Timberlake," salivating and tripping all over themselves to seize the opportunity to publish an obviously smart, literary young author who is ALSO familiar with rap acts as disparate as Wu Tang Clan, J-Live, and Talib Kweli. It's nice that Wicker bridges those worlds--but his inability to develop and sustain focus upon complex HUMAN driven conflicts in favor of rhythmic and auditory slights of hand and poem endings which attempt surprise or epiphany through reliance upon profanity grows tiresome rather quickly.
Wicker's best moments are his human ones. In "The Nature of the Beast," he explores, quite complexly, the routines and chores which couples divide, often with underlying resentment and jealosy. Best of all, the speaker's tone in that poem manages to balance between empathy and overt antagonism, a welcome retreat from the clever-fest which marks so much of the other prosody here. In another rare gem, "I'm a sad, sad, man. So Sad," Wicker explores both his desire and disgust in needing/hating to see everything which happens to him as an opportunity for a poem. He seems trapped between his art and is desire to simply live without comment, and to his credit, he doesn't postulate an escape from this tension, realizing instead, that it is probably the source of his art afterall.
But these moments are few and not frequent enough to justify or reward the time I devoted to reading these poems. A paradigm I often use to decide whether I believe a poem is "effective," or good is whether it can hold up to, or CALLS FOR multiple readings, AND whether I feel a desire for such repeated visits. I'm happy to put this book back on my shelf, knowing that I'm not missing anything I'll need.