An interesting, provocative, but flawed analysis of Texas's governing philosophy and relationship with the rest of the United States.
The biggest pro of this book, for me, is that Grieder gives her state a lot of context and perspective. She seems to be especially targeting progressives inclined to demonize Texas because of its prominent right-wing politicians and various other political issues that impact the rest of the country. There's a lot in here about Texas history and governing philosophy that makes not just Texas but other frontier states founded around the same time (such as North Dakota, the state in which I currently reside) make a whole lot more sense to someone who was raised in a blue state. And I think it's admirable that her overall focus is on Texas and the rest of America trying to learn from each other instead of resorting to knee-jerk hyperbole, both liberal and conservative. I learned a lot from reading this book and got a much better perspective of the world as it really is, not just as people who spend their lives overreacting to trivial political issues want to pretend it is.
With that said, this book is far from perfect.
First of all, the title is misleading because it implies the same kind of Texan belligerence that liberals find so off-putting, when in fact Grieder mostly takes a fairly balanced and moderate tone throughout. There are a few spelling errors throughout, which annoys me for a work that someone is charging money for, and I felt like a lot of the chapters flowed together too superficially in that uniquely irksome way that happens when journalists try to write books. And the focus on mostly counteracting hyperventilating liberal critiques of Texas (which is very valid up to a point) may limit the audience of this book to people who are already familiar with such critiques.
However, the biggest issue I had with this book is that Grieder mostly takes a fairly balanced and moderate tone, but at times can't seem to stick to it. For example, her otherwise above-average use of citations and factual evidence seems to go out the window whenever she encounters an issue that she personally does not want to think about. Nowhere is this more apparent than when she continually dodges around the ramifications of the fact that the religious right has lately exerted control over Texas government to a much greater degree than she gives it credit for, from the textbook issue (which she dismisses outright but that multiple education experts within that field agree is a VERY big deal) to the fact that having a strong separation of church and state clause in the state constitution isn't worth much if it's only going to be selectively enforced (Texas Freedom Network, which Grieder mentions repeatedly when they're saying something she wants us to see, has an entire page on their website devoted to this very issue). Other issues that she mentions but refuses to cover in detail include the state's poor record on human services generally, and on law and order issues - especially capital punishment (which she dismisses as the work of one rogue DA) and punitive targeting of minors in public schools by law enforcement (which she totally ignores).
In addition to this problem in her coverage, Grieder also frequently compares Texas to California whenever she's discussing something Texas does better, which I thought was tacky given that she kind of seems to be rolling her eyes at Rick Perry for doing the same; a more balanced range of data comparing Texas to other large states would have been more effective, albeit less flattering given that Texas usually finds itself in the bottom third of such rankings (another unflattering phenomenon that Grieder acknowledges but does not explore).
Ultimately, this was an interesting read that gave me a lot of perspective, helped me understand a lot about why Texans are the way they are, and finally convinced me to donate my copy of What's the Matter With Kansas? to the library sale because it espouses a very jaundiced way of looking at the world. Grieder's faults as an author and inability to overcome certain selective biases keep this from being a truly outstanding work, but I would definitely recommend it as a library book if you're interested in the subject matter and are willing to tolerate its inconsistencies.