This official history of the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) draws on unprecedented access to the BBFC's archives to trace 100 years of film classification, with contributions from leading film critics and historians and case studies of controversial films such as Battleship Potemkin and A Clockwork Orange .
Edward Lamberti teaches film at King's College London and also works at the British Board of Film Classification. He is the editor of Behind the Scenes at the BBFC: Film Classification from the Silver Screen to the Digital Age (longlisted for the 2013 Kraszna-Krausz Book Award for Best Moving Image Book).
From the BBFC on the BBFC covering 100 years of its existence. This was written in chronological order from the various perspectives of former and current staff members and those in the know.
Although I didn't recognise all the films (my film knowledge is actually pitifully limited), a brief overview was supplied in most cases and there were also case studies giving more information on specific films.
The book seemed very well researched and authoritative. Countless dates, details and examples were used to back up everything that was said. Although thorough, it wasn't boring. Slow progress was made though as the text size is very small.
I didn't like the final chapter. The book brings you right up to date (to 2012 anyway), but the last chapter is a series of short essays on various elements of the BBFC and its role. These were just sort of stuck in all together at the end and covered some of the same ground that I'd already read about in the book. They could perhaps have been placed better, though I'd prefer for them not to be included at all as they were mostly DULL. Read the book, but skip the final chapter.
The official retrospective of the BBFC's first 100 years is an interesting alternative history of British cinema. Familiar landmarks are ignored, focusing instead on those movies (obscure, well-known and forgotten) that challenged public attitudes at a particular moment. Being an authorised analysis, the contributors are broadly sympathetic to the BBFC's attitudes; at least, they attempt an explanation of the board's reasoning. Its only the organisation's former director, Robin Duvall, later in the piece, who is willing (perhaps the only one who feels politely able) to condemn his predecessors where they have been indecisive, overly cautious or just plain wrong.