The collapse of both sets of Arab-Israeli negotiations in 2000 led not only to recrimination and bloodshed, with the outbreak of the second intifada, but to the creation of a new myth. Syrian and Palestinian intransigence was blamed for the current disastrous state of affairs, as both parties rejected a "generous" peace offering from the Israelis that would have brought peace to the region.
The Truth About Camp David shatters that myth. Based on the riveting, eyewitness accounts of more than forty direct participants involved in the latest rounds of Arab-Israeli negotiations, including the Camp David 2000 summit, former federal investigator-turned-investigative journalist Clayton E. Swisher provides a compelling counter-narrative to the commonly accepted history. The Truth About Camp David details the tragic inner workings of the Clinton Administration's negotiating mayhem, their eleventh hour blunders and miscalculations, and their concluding decision to end the Oslo process with blame and disengagement. It is not only a fascinating historical look at Middle East politics on the brink of disaster, but a revelatory portrait of how all-too-human American political considerations helped facilitate the present crisis.
Clayton Swishers "The Truth About Camp David" tells the story of the - apparent - frenzy of peace negotiations that occurred during the tail end of the Clinton administration after the overtly intransigent Benyamin Netenyahu was replaced by Labours Ehud Barak.
If you get your news from mainstream organisations, say the BBC, then chances are you will shrug your shoulders or shake your head at the outcome of the Israeli- Syrian and Israeli-Palestinian talks: can't these guys ever live at peace! If you read a newspaper that's sympathetic to the Israeli position (i.e. practically any newspaper in the U.S. and a good few here in the U.K.) then you probably feel, to quote the much cited remark of Abbas Eban, that the "Palestinians never miss a chance to miss peace." The great achievement of Clayton Swishers remarkable book is to explode these twin myths of "equivalence" between the parties, and Palestinian intransigence-Israeli victimhood. Instead the reader is presented with the real story, the product of Swishers detailed research and scores of hours of interviews with the participants. It is one in which the U.S. is the dishonest broker, the Israelis behave like burglars expecting to hang onto half the loot in peace, and the Palestinians (and Syrians) are cajoled, coerced, misled and marginalised and finally cast as villains.
The early part of the book details the fruits of Baraks Syria first policy that led to the non-event summit in Geneva which came about when president Assad was misled by the Americans into believing the Israelis were ready to honour former prime-minister Rabins committment to comply with international law and exit the Golan. The larger and later part concerns the build-up to the Camp David summit as well as a detailed account of the event itself.
The personalities, procedure and substance of the negotiations are clearly narrated in a straight-forward prose. The main actors are undoubtedly foregrounded: their past involvements with the Israeli-Arab conflict as well as what they say and do during the negotiations are covered in detail. Particularly fascinating are the accounts of the senior U.S. negotiator Dennis Ross (more pro-Israel than many on the Israeli side) and Ehud Barak. This is complemented with a substantial amount of attention to the reality within the Occupied Territories, Israel proper and (to a lesser degree) the United States. The final part of the book looks at the post summit spinning that laid the blame firmly at the Palestinian door, and how the path was firmly set for the second Intifada to eventually explode.
This is a substantial and important work that along with Edward Saids trilogy on the peace process ("Peace and Its Discontents", "The End of the Peace Proces'] and "From Oslo to Iraq and the Roadmap"), Tanya Reinharts "The Road Map to Nowhere" and Jonathan Cooks "Disappearing Palestine" provide a clear and moral account of the Israeli-Palestine conflict in the 1990's and 2000's. Well recommended.
This book is a well researched, documented, written and revealing insight into the dysfunctional and damaging role the US plays in the search for peace in the Middle East. I highly recommend it to anyone interested in understanding how the foreign policy of the US in the Middle East does not serve US national interest but is driven by domestic Israeli and US politics.
This book does a fantastic job of breaking down years/decades of propaganda Americans were taught about Palestinians, Camp David, and the peace process. With hindsight, we are able to see why the Israeli methods of trying to establish peace are escalatory by nature. The addition of the Syria track along with the mindset of the individuals involved in the peace deal was vital to understanding why the Camp David summit was bound to fail. While it’s emphasized in the book that Arafat did reject the few Israeli curtailed offers, it completely destroys any argument that Israel and America offered any viable solutions to Palestinian plights. The author holds America and Israel accountable for their parts in the failure of the Oslo and Camp David peace processes.
While Clayton Swisher doesn't quite have the punch or the precision of Josh Ruebner, he is a solid and very well-sourced journalist. And many of his talks with the key players in Clinton's failed efforts with Israel and Palestine reveal a number of vital elements that are helpful in understanding why every American President after Carter has failed to broker a peace. For one thing, Clinton's ego and his desire to win a Nobel Peace Prize got in the way of doing the proper prep work to push peace forward. (Swisher got Carter and Mondale on record. The Clinton camp never contacted either of them before they began this, apparently learning nothing from Halberstam's THE BEST AND THE BRIGHTEST.) And having a disliked and tendentious guy like Dennis Ross in your corner was definitely an unwise move. But Swisher digs up some other vital details. He gets Madeline Albright to confess that Clinton was given a list of talking points by Barak, where he was told to mention these word for word. And he did. He unpacks a rare quote from Ariel Sharon confessing that Israel's assault on Palestine was indeed an "occupation." And he does a nimble job of showing why the Camp David talks failed and revealing just how much America caved to Israel. Which is typically not what you do when you are supposed to remain neutral during a negotiation. So you have a combination of hubris, partiality to Israel, a lack of backbone, and a paucity of preparation. The same ingredients that caused Obama to fail with his efforts. One would think that presidential administrations would learn from history, but they clearly aren't interested in doing so.
Well researched and thorough. Hard at times to keep track of all the back and forth of names, ideas, refutations, and arguments. However, the author is simply attempting to report the events as they occured. It's hard not to take away strong feelings of cynism given that Camp David II is often viewed as the closest the sides have come to an agreement. As articulated by the author I didn't get the sense that a deal was remotely close at any point in the negotiations and the question is left open as to whether the summit was simply a waste of time and/or actually severely damaging to the long term prospects for peace.
One of the best books about the "Middle East peace process" !!
Firmly nails the lie that it was the Palestinians at fault for the collapse of the Camp David summit and also exposes the ridiculous belief that the USA are honest brokers in the search for peace !