Πέρα από τη συνεισφορά του στον θεωρητικό και κλινικό αναπροσανατολισμό της ψυχανάλυσης, το έργο του Ζακ Λακάν επηρεάζει ολοένα και περισσότερο τη σύγχρονη φιλοσοφία, αλλά και τις κοινωνικές επιστήμες.
Συνδυάζοντας μια συνοπτική παρουσίαση του λακανικού εννοιολογικού οπλοστασίου με μια συστηματική αξιολόγηση της σημασίας του για τη σύγχρονη πολιτική θεωρία, "Ο Λακάν και το πολιτικό" αναδεικνύει τη ριζοσπαστική οπτική του Γάλλου στοχαστή πάνω στο κοινωνικό και πολιτικό πεδίο. Παράλληλα, οριοθετεί τη συμβολή του σ' ένα θεωρητικό στερέωμα που περιλαμβάνει, μεταξύ άλλων, την αποδόμηση, τη θεωρία του λόγου, την κοινωνιολογία του ρίσκου και τις ουτοπικές σπουδές.
Υποστηρίζει ότι η σκέψη του Λακάν μπορεί να γίνει το εφαλτήριο για να επαναπροσδιοριστούν σημαντικές πλευρές της κοινωνικής και πολιτικής ανάλυσης, αλλά και ότι μπορεί να συμβάλει αποφασιστικά στην ανάδειξη του ριζοσπαστικού δυναμικού της σύγχρονης δημοκρατίας.
"Ο Λακάν και το πολιτικό προσφέρει τόσο μια ενδελεχή και διαυγή παρουσίαση των βασικότερων λακανικών εννοιών όσο και την πλέον οξυδερκή και ανανεωτική μέχρι σήμερα προσπάθεια να χρησιμοποιηθούν στην μελέτη των σύγχρονων κοινωνικών και πολιτικών φαινομένων."
« C’est en cela que consiste spécifiquement la politique : elle est le lieu d’une fracture de la vérité» Marcel Gauchet
Around one hundred pages on the Lacanian subject and the Lacanian object, out of nearly 200 pages. Those one hundred pages are well written and faithful to the Lacanian views. But the rest has few examples on politics (maybe that one on South African apartheid is an exception) and, on the "political" aspect, the concept of democracy is pervasive, I would say. Stavrakakis' ("radical") democracy concept is a left-wing one. (Just check the number of times he quotes Ernesto Laclau*).
Politics is still, in great part, unconscious, in this book.
* a somehow enthusiast regarding Hugo Chavez, and a believer in the spreading of the "pink wave" throughout Latin America. Quite recently, J. Milei, and others, proved him wrong.
Lacan and the Political is really just ok. Stavrakakis does a better job than Zizek in explicating some of Lacan's theoretical ideas and their application to society and politics, but with the caveat that he presupposes his readers already have a very basic understanding of Lacan's theory. Do not expect this book to be and introduction to Lacan, because it isn't, and if you go into it with little to no understanding of Lacan it will be impossible to glean anything from it.
I did not enjoy Stavrakakis' conclusions, specifically his work in chapter five on Radical Democracy. It just wasn't very good in that it felt like it was lacking (no pun intended). I also just don't really think that Lacanian Theory WORKS in conjunction with radical democracy, and while I understand how someone could find it applicable, I suspect that it is largely a misreading of the Lacanian Feminine.
Overall, chapters 1-4 were pretty good, chapter 5 felt almost premature and hastily developed. I wasn't satisfied with it at all.
Worth a read, but don't put too much stock in the end game.
neat. a clear and, dare I say, pragmatic (characteristics i haven't been known to find especially seductive) exploration of this notoriously abstruse thinker. That this can be done without vulgarizing the theory too bad was for me a mini-revelation itself. Thanks Stavrakakis. The orientation of this book was different than that of, say, fink's intros to lacan in that, as the title suggests, this is geared towards explicitly elucidating the political implications of Lacan's project, rather than for use by anlaysts specifically.
Excellent introduction and elaboration: Lacan is an inherently difficult writer to understand; Stavrakakis provides one of the most lucid introduction to his ideas, serving to ground in clear terms the applicability of Lacanian concepts to the political and the social. While I have some disagreements with his elaborations and conclusions, these stem more from the breadth of my own developed Lacanian education- entirelly thanks to Stavrakakis- rather than what I initially brought to the experience of reading this fine text.
• meanders between excellent and tangent • plenty of terminological development - point de capiton; the real; the Other etc — political v politics explanation felt garbled — point de capiton explanation was very good • starts with semiotic incompleteness, and builds upwards and outwards from there • if the last few pages weren’t responding to niche critiques that didn’t feel overly in line with the rest of the chapter (the positions of other authors wasn’t well contrasted) I think 3.5-3.75 stars is more apt • exploring democracy and paving way for radical democratic theory
این کتاب را با ترجمه ی عالی محمد علی جعفری خوندم. برای ورود به بعد جامعه شناسی ِ روانشناسی ِ لاکان، کتاب خوبی است ( در واقع تنها کتابی که به فارسی ترجمه شده ). نویسنده ی کتاب هم یکی از تئوری پردازهای علوم سیاسی در یونان است