I like flying and books about flying, so when I saw this title in a book swap I picked it up. It was evidently about wartime flying I was not even sure which war. It turned out to be the First World War. The only other books I think I have read about flying in the First World War are Biggles books, and this one is very different.
It is quickly evident that the author knows what he is talking about, that he had flown. There are a lot of technical details and jargon. He does not make any attempt to explain any of this. A lot of the time it is possible to guess the meaning of these words, but I did also find myself looking a lot up. I have to say that Wikipedia was pretty good at explaining most of this.
An example of the jargon is that anti-aircraft fire is referred to as 'Archie', but in such a way that Archie is personified. For instance, 'Archie nagged them all the time.'
I should also say that Yeates uses a lot of quite peculiar (non-technical) vocabulary. The book was written some time between then end of the War and Yeates' death in the 1930s, and I am not sure whether everyone spoke or wrote like that, used those now-obscure words, or whether Yeates had quite an exceptionally broad vocabulary. If I had been reading this on a Kindle I would have been touching words a lot. As it was I did look some of them up in a dictionary.
Unlike Biggles books, there is no strong plot in this book; it is more like memoirs, recounting the facts of life in the Royal Flying Corps (which did evolve into the Royal Air Force within the timespan of the book). So, evidently it is quite auto-biographical. Yeates clearly uses the book to promote some of his own views and philosophy. Of course he can use the mechanism of dialogue to present arguments and counter-arguments. Overall, though, he was quite opposed to the war, to wars. He frequently presents the proposition that the only beneficiaries of war are the business men and capitalists. Through the main character - Tom Cullen - he seems to become increasingly disillusioned with the killing. He was also concerned about his own courage or lack of it. He frequently questioned the extent to which he has the 'wind up' (which is hard to remember to read 'wind' as the meteorological phenomenon and not as what you do with a clock).
There are a number of aspects which surprised me to some extent. One was the level of drinking. I can see how pilots under the stress of fighting would seek escape in drink, but it seems quite excessive. It was not just the drinking, either, but frequently the binges would result in vandalism, smashing up the mess. It was evident that no one in authority (i.e. the squadron commander) was concerned by this, and, when necessary, a truck would be sent to a nearby town to loot furniture from abandoned houses to replaces the breakages. I suppose that again this was seen as a necessary release for the airmen.
Another surprise was the fact that the pilots took amusement in buzzing their own side. (He calls if strafing, but without the firing of guns.) They would fly low to scare and to scatter, and it seems like the higher ranked the victims the better. There was an assumption that their aircraft would never be identified, and hence they would get away with it.
This is all against a background in which casualties were evidently very heavy; a number of pilots seemed to be killed on every 'job'. On the other hand, the German (invariably 'Hun') airforce seemed ineffectual. It seemed that their aircraft generally turned around and headed for home and would not engage.
As I say, there was no driving plot to draw me back to reading, but there was the motivation to know what happened, would Tom survive. I will keep this as a reference book.