This did its job, which was to inform me of the basic arguments on both sides of the gender wage gap debate. (This was the only section that I read). It was a little too pitched towards arguing about affirmative action initiatives for women, though. Overall, I'd say that the pro-wage gap camp did a better job remaining objective and convincing. I'm biased, but somehow, claiming that the whole concept of a glass ceiling is "a figment of feminist imaginations, up there with the myths of alar poisoning, and Jews eating Christian babies on Passover ...[because] it's in the interests of feminists to portray women as victims, since it gives women greater economic benefits" makes me want to treat all of the following arguments with a grain of salt. (that quote is from Diana Furchtgott-Roth, a resident fellow at a "conservative think tank" at the time of publication)