唔知道係咪因為 2019 香港既社會運動令到呢本書又流行咗一下?其實老伯能睇得出未來所有事情會點發生,就會連帶睇得出衛斯理都做唔到 D 乜去阻止,所以都唔需要緊張去搵衛斯理去幫手,不過可能老伯都睇得出自己忍唔住要搵衛斯理,所以一直催佢細路去搵衛斯理,細佬亦都無特別去搵衛斯理只不過又剛巧撞見(又係老伯預料之內?)佢裡面有一段講開盒開完一層又一層,唔知道係咪抄 Flann O'Brien 其中一本小說?我唔記得邊本。雖然 Flann 哥都可能系抄其他人。
戴卓爾夫人 1982 年9月係北京 PK,呢本書 1983 年1月開始連載,當年閱讀呢本小說既香港人究竟係乜心情?睇完有無變得更焦慮?我當時讀緊小學,都唔明白發生緊乜事,只知道一班同學每年都有人走。過去幾十年香港經濟反反复复但大陸一直灌水(例如買咗好多房產,要知道其中一種控制模式就系擁有模式)。當年走既,回望一下,錢財方面都可能會有 D 後悔?心靈方面恐怕都系反反复复,無辦法,人生就係咁,無話對錯。石黑一雄話齋(討論 remains of the days 時候講),有D 個人選擇對人生既影響系無法磨滅;但係國家做錯咗,一路走下去能夠賦予時間就有機會糾正。倪匡叔叔 v 石黑一雄叔叔,今日想一想,發現完全兩面睇。。。
It was not the best, nor the most memorable, fiction written by this prolific author. However, it was the most special one. The protagonist did not take any action at the end, hinting the inevitable downfall of “the city”, i.e. Hong Kong.
The story is very simple and can be summarised without losing any nuances in just a page or two. The plot is pseudoscientific. The philosophical deliberations are incoherent. In having said that, the last two chapters (around thirty pages) are poignant and seemingly prescient. However, when a writer is prolific and his readers want to read into his ambiguous musings something prophetic, then he can be made an oracle when he is merely garrulous. Simplification of reality is always suspect. In any case, it does capture the pathos of the time when it was written.