I wanted to like this book so much more than I did, and in a way I really did like it. I think Jennifer Saint has a brilliant prose, a beautiful way with words that made me fall in love with Ariadne. I enjoyed her remaining faithful to the fact that greek mythology is inherently always a tragedy and mostly at the detriment of women.
However, it saddens me that where the myths offer many variations, she always chooses the one where it is women (godesses of mortal) hurting women. I have a few criticisms but I want to start with the good:
- The writing is obviously amazing. The beginning and the end were impossible to put down, I loved it, it made me feel like I was there, with the characters.
- Friendships between the romantic leads is well done and feels organic (it is the transition to romance which did not work for me)
- There is more character development in Atalanta than I saw in Elektra, and for me that was a good sign.
I loved the parallels between Atalanta's upbringing and how she is herself by the end of the book.
I also have two sets of issues: my issues with this book, and my issues with the pattern in Jennifer Saint's books:
The story itself:
While I understand that this is also the Arganaut's story, the way Jason ended up actually winning doesn't seem very exciting in hindsight, but it baffled me that it was a succession of arriving and leaving islands and then a quick 3-4 pages to get the price.
We are given a mountain of characters who are barely introduced until they say something or do something, which made it feel constantly as if "well if they don't matter for this scene, they don't exist" which isn't great for the reader. I feel like many events were thrown in a succession in the middle, with great scenes like harpies wolfing down on a blind prophet being fixed up in a couple paragraphs. it was both too slow and too rushed and I didn't like that at all.
Now my main issue is the romance. Both of them actually. I got intense whiplash from the transitions to romance because they came out of nowhere. While the friendships were set up great, the sudden switch to "okay let's kiss now" each time came out of nowhere, with little indication that the FMC was going to pursue a romantic relationship, aside from maybe two lines here and there clearly only written to guide the reader, which again, is more telling than showing. The entire first relationship was baffling, the characters behaved in jealous manners out of nowhere, nothing was clear, their entire romance felt bland and like an afterthought and it was so jarring that I actually considered DNFing. There is literally no proper character thought process to make the virginal hero of Artemis decide on a whim to abandon and risk her entire life for a married man. This isn't even counting the number of times characters seemed to disappear from scenes out of nowhere which was incredibly confusing.
The ending romance was just the same, we go from a soft "well this is nice, they have an intimacy, a beautiful friendship that could blossom into love" to BAM they are KISSING. Like, Atalanta appreciates a guy, is good friends with him, and yes it's very clear he likes her, but then she decides to save his life, and all of a sudden is kissing him and running away with him...and again, WHIPLASH.
I could spend hours on this but I'm not entirely sure it's worth it since people loved it and it's not like after 3 books any review is going to fix the issues of pacing. I love greek mythology retellings, and I don't always mind slower pace novels, but when there is a constant disconnect between fast scenes and slow scenes, and a feeling that character's decisions switch out of nowhere, or too abruptly, it makes the experience unsettling. Character's deaths felt like they held no emotional weight, important events happen so quickly it's almost too easy to miss out, and crucial events are written in a way that I had to pause several times to wonder "is she implying this or am I imagining it"
My issue with this book also confirms a pattern i've noticed so far: being a good writer is essential and that, Jennifer Saint is, however when you take a story that already exists from beginning to end as Greek myths do, it is disappointing that nothing is added to it. This is as Ariadne and Elektra were: a novelisation of the greek myths to the T without adding depth to the characters. That's an issue because the myths as they existed were told orally, which means that motivations and character development weren't that much of a factor, but in writing, if nothing is added to it, it makes the character dull and empty, and the story nearly cartoonish. It's made even worse by the fact that other events and characters backstories are dumped unceremoniously in the story to make sense of it, which means that even the fantastical stories behind the myths aren't really important for the author. There are few greek mythology books out there that are purely greek mythology, and while i dont mind the modern retellings, my first love is the faithful retellings, which is why it breaks my heart to see that while this is a beautifully written book with many, many, MANY good aspects to it, it doesn't feel as if it has any desire to go deeper into the characters and the story than the superficial aspects of it.
So yes, I enjoyed this book despite it all, but where i was sure throughout the beginning of the book that it would be a 4 star, i couldn't get over the fact that there was clearly no intent on adding much to the myth, and that the pacing was so harsh and abrupt that scenes meant to be emotional severely lacked the gravitas they were clearly meant to have.
I think the beginning and the ending of the book show very well what the book could have been but fell short of.