No, thanks.
Spoiler Alerts!
This was described to me as a light-hearted/fun romance with a (likely murder) mystery. However, it felt more like a pornographic book that was short on substance (little to no plot or real character development, imho), but lots of extremely graphic sexual content, profanity, & frankly, inappropriate content (I'll get to that shortly.).
-Plot/Characters: The main plot(s) were very thinly developed. It isn't very clear why the most dangerous person continuously tries to harm (much less, knows how to locate them at all times) people he's never met (other than a repeated, offensive, homophobic suggestion that the former cellmate of an abusive ex of the protagonist's employee (who is barely discussed) is somehow beholden to the ex bc..."a*s wife," or "a*s bandit." The other plot, a murder, is explained at the end but otherwise hardly mentioned. The first plot has lots of action but little development/substance. I also have no idea why the protagonist needed to verbally abuse her staff (& in particular, an employee who'd just had her abusive ex come to kidnap her) as a way to "defend" herself/ her peers. Yea, showing cleavage can be a distraction, or trying to get someone away from a dangerous person by maybe asking them to go check inventory, but screaming at people for not being able to do anything right & telling the abuse survivor that she was fired?! Yea, ok. This book seems to lack substance in far too many respects--plot development, an actual mystery, characters, judgments made, etc.
The characters: not much development of most characters beyond a description of what they look like, whether or not they require padded bras (yes, really), how often they date/have sex, & what kind of guns they have.
-Problem Issues:
1.) Homophobia: It gets very old, very quickly to keep reading derogatory references to even the possibility of an LGBTQ+ relationship. The author decides it's appropriate to describe people (pejoratively, of course) as "di*klicker," "pansy-a*ssed/a*ses," & the terms mentioned above. Beyond gross.
2.) Slut-Shaming: The women whom the author depicts as likable shamelessly admit they had "x-rated" first dates, use men for sex, & go into great detail about just how "x-rated" their behaviors are. Fine, but then I found it more than a little frustrating that the go-to to insult for a woman was to call her a "whore," "hooker," or similar language pretty incessantly.
3.) Mental Health Stigma: The author regularly throws around words like "schizophrenic" to describe someone having conflicting feelings & uses terms like "psycho b*tch" or "psychotic" to insult people &/or describe things that bear no actual relationship to those words. Also not cool with the author's word, "b*tchtard," when we all know what the "tard" part references (& gross stigmatizing developmental disability), but she goes even farther by having the person who says such things be concerned that such insults weren't offensive enough, then congratulates herself on coming up with "di*cklicker" as an alternative.
3.) Indigenous people: The term "American Indian" should be outdated, & the one indigenous (minor) character is pretty much the epitome of every common stereotype. Of course, the protagonist dislikes him (after "knowing" him for maybe 24 hours) bc him being indigenous means he looks a certain way, wears long hair in a braid (& thankfully, she tells us, manages not to look feminine--which, ugh), & of course, his reticence makes him an inscrutable jerk.
4.) Guns/Politics: Indicating someone is brilliant bc they claim the things would be great if a handful of GOP businessmen ran the nation was odd. The prevalence of guns & calling them "sexy" is not great. Gun violence is an epidemic, so all the bragging ab sexiness, make, models, prevalence, etc. of everyone's guns is not my cup of tea. There's even a dispute ab whether a gun is masculine... (Smh).
-Sex: The author says to expect sexual references, but I really didn't need to read ab squeezing/gripping/etc. bare "a*ses" so often that it felt like this book was just porn with a tiny story. Every encounter with someone doesn't need to be so explicit. I'd prefer less precise descriptions of bodily fluids (especially when describing someone covered in the gore/etc. of someone they'd just shot). "Insert foreign objects into my orifices" is said by the protagonist in regular parlance at a "family" dinner, which her young niece, friend's elderly aunt, & entire family can hear/comment on. The beginning was so graphic & somewhat misleading as to be a potential trigger for abuse survivors. I understand a little mystery & role play, but this was overkill. It had all the earmarks of a very dangerous, violent, & abusive sexual assault & burglary. Perhaps the protagonist didn't need to talk ab her baseball bat, try so hard & in so many ways to do bodily harm to the other person, etc.? Once or twice would have been more than enough.
Finally, the grammar is bad. :(