This book consists of two parts:
1. An outline of the main ideas in Sufism.
2. A description of the local climate of Sufism among the Malays in Peninsular Malaysia.
I believe the relationship between the Master of the Order and his acolytes represents a vital domain where genuine psychological healing can occur. Sufism is often caricatured as producing ever-abiding, servile followers, but the reality is far from this. The journey of gnosis is a deeply personal venture that only the wayfarer can undertake. However, a Mentor archetype is essential to facilitate the journey; without such guidance, the wayfarer risks becoming lost in limbo. History, anthropology, and comparative mythology are replete with examples of these special relationships, from Merlin and King Arthur to Gandalf in The Lord of the Rings.
I believe the Master-acolyte relationship provides a framework where the acolyte (or even a client) can cultivate more stable and mature attachments, achieve self-individuation through mentorship, and progress through stages of psychological maturity. Most importantly, it prepares the acolyte for “graduation” (symbolized by the bestowing of the ijaza) after attaining invaluable experiential knowledge—knowledge they, in turn, can pass on. If Midas’s touch yielded lifeless gold, the accomplished wayfarer’s touch should yield an endless cornucopia, benefitting all they encounter. But this requires further exploration; I digress here.
The first part of the book provides a historical context for the development of Sufism in Islam. Al-Attas convincingly argues that Sufism did not originate in Hellas or among the Brahmins but in the very veranda of the Mosque in Medina. Sufism embodies ihsan, the third aspect of Islam referenced in the angel Gabriel’s dialogue with the Prophet. Initially, Sufism focused on purifying the Self, acting as a natural extension and completion of Islamic Law. Over time, it evolved into a fully-fledged prescriptive discipline of Islam, shaped by early Masters such as al-Kharraj, al-Qushairi, and al-Jilani. Al-Ghazali solidified Sufism’s legitimacy by integrating theology, jurisprudence, and Sufistic metaphysics in works like The Niche of Light. Successive luminaries further expanded its principles, allowing Sufism to flourish.
The story of Sufism resembles that of a single rose: while its facets and stages evolve over time, what we witness is the same rose blooming in successive phases, its fragrance becoming richer and more complete.
Al-Attas also defends one of Sufism’s key metaphysical doctrines, the Unity of Existence (wahdat al-wujud). The latter half of his Prolegomena essentially explores Akbarian-Sadrian metaphysics, which he presents as the pinnacle of Islamic metaphysical thought. This doctrine offers believers an ontological and metaphysical framework, complementing the rational theology of kalam, which delineates truth from falsehood. He likens this to constructing a house: a fence (theology) provides safety, but this safety allows for the creation of resplendent gardens and a house that serves as a haven for the soul (metaphysics).
Al-Attas highlights several points:
1. Perpetual Creation and Orthodox Theology: Sufis and orthodox Ash’arites and Maturidites agree on the idea of timeless, perpetual creation. While orthodox theology posits that atoms gain existence through accidents qualifying them, Sufis extend this to argue that atoms are thus basically non-existent prior to qualification. In their view, even atoms are a special type of accident, manifesting only through the creative Divine Will, in a cycle of creation and annihilation.
2. Epistemological and Ontological Model: Sufism provides a robust alternative to Skepticism and Idealism. As discussed in Things as They Are, Sufistic metaphysics affirms that things-in-themselves correspond to Archetypes. Unlike Kant, who argued the extramental world is unknowable, Sufis assert that existence is instantiated by the Divine Will. Against Idealism’s dictum, “to be is to be perceived,” Sufis counter, “to be is to be instantiated (by the Divine Will).”
3. Radical Monotheism: Sufism represents the highest expression of monotheism, resolving the tension between God’s transcendence and immanence. While other traditions struggle with this paradox—Hebraism emphasizing transcendence, Christianity favoring immanence—Sufism posits that the world is real but only through its relation to the perpetual Divine Source. Like an image in a mirror, the world exists as long as the Gazer looks; it has no independent substance. Thus, God is both utterly transcendent and pervasively immediate and intimate.
4. Interpretation of Sufi Utterances: The seemingly ambiguous expressions of Sufis must be understood intensively, not extensively. In states of ecstatic annihilation, some Sufis utter phrases that might suggest associationism (shirk), but these are unintentional and akin to a person’s incoherent speech post-anesthesia. Even outside such states, the writings of Sufis often express the overwhelming “tasting” (dhawq) of Divine presence rather than theological assertions.
The second part of the book examines the Sufi climate in Malaysia, which aligns with my experience in the Khalwatiyyah Samaniyyah Order, historically associated with figures like the martyred Shaykh Abdul Samad al-Falimbani.
Sufi Orders in Malaysia are typically loose and decentralized. Membership is non-exclusive, allowing acolytes to join multiple Orders and practice their invocations as they see fit. Unlike global counterparts, Malaysian Orders rarely have dedicated zawiyahs (Sufi lodges); congregations often take place in mosques where the Master is an imam or committee member.
Succession practices also vary. Masters may be chosen by their predecessors or elected by senior members. Candidates are assessed less on formal education and more on their gnostic experiences and ability to perform charismatic miracles (karamat). My grandfather, the current Master, himself was a postman before succeeding his teacher after decades of rigorous training.
Core practices in the Order include initiation (bai‘ah), prescribed invocations, and weekly gatherings. Practices like music, dance, or truncated invocations (e.g., Ahip, Ahum) are no forbidden, and advanced metaphysical discussions are limited to senior members. These reforms initially caused discontent among acolytes seeking more extravagant practices, but I say, the lesser, the better.