My brother is an atheist (I am a practicing Catholic), so I spend a lot of time debating with him. This book is a good primer, but I felt it only accomplished making an atheist or materialist argument just as dubious as an argument for God. Which is fine, if you want us both to end up agnostic. I don’t think this would ever convince an open-minded atheist if I’m being honest, but it does a good job of showing how the atheist argument is just as fundamentalist as religious fundamentalists.
It’s also not as smug as Kreeft’s other books, but the smugness is there, which I think would be a huge turn off to any inquisitive agnostic or atheist. There’s a presumption that materialists are smug, which is not true a lot of the time. Obviously the heavy hitters can be, but meeting smug with smug is not compelling. I’m also really over the “we are being attacked” rhetoric. No, we’re being called to actually adequately explain our beliefs after centuries of occasionally using these beliefs in toxic ways. Let’s not be Pharisees about it. Many solid, intelligent Catholics are even questioning the hierarchy and the legitimacy of what the hierarchy told us....
I thought the resurrection arguments were interesting- something weird happened. As some other reviews mentioned, some arguments are strong, some are really weak.
Kreeft and Tacelli also recommend further reading sources like Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, which scientists claim is a ridiculous misinterpretation of evolution. That said, the authors of this book also claim evolution is most definitely plausible, and that religious zealots make a huge mistake writing it off. So, I’m not sure what to think of that, but the book rec made me trust other arguments less, and I think the same for a conscientious atheist or agnostic. Kinda just makes you not want to waste your time.
Also, many of the books in the bibliography seem woefully outdated, but that’s because this is an old book.
I’m planning to look up Bishop Barron’s recommendation for fresher, more scientifically up to date arguments.