Double Double: A Dual Memoir of Alcoholism

by Martha Grimes, Ken Grimes

From the opening paragraphs of Double Double:“We were sitting in a coffee shop talking, looking at the view of downtown Charlottesville, Virginia. This was ten years ago, and we had both been off alcohol for more than a decade. We were disagreeing about the best way to stay sober, when my mother said, “I think we should write a book about alcoholism.”

I sat back. ‘We?’

‘Both of us. Two points of view.’ ”

To the final page of this dual memoir, Martha and Ken Grimes keep the reader entertained and informed.

Double Double is a unique and honest, dual memoir of alcoholism, a disease that affects nearly 45 million Americans each year. People who suffer from alcoholism as well as their families and friends know that while it is possible to get sober—there is no one “right” way to do this. Now, award-winning mystery writer Martha Grimes and her son, Ken Grimes, offer two points of view on their struggles with alcoholism. In alternating chapters, they share their stories—stories of drinking, recovery, relapse, friendship, travel, work, success and failure.

Double Double is an intensely personal, candid and illuminating book, filled with insights, humor, a little self-deprecation, and a lot of self-evaluation.

Genres: Nonfiction, Memoir, Biography, Addiction, Social Work, Psychology, Alcohol

240 pages, Hardcover

First published June 4, 2013

About the author

Martha Grimes is an American author of detective fiction.

She was born May 2 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to D.W., a city solicitor, and to June, who owned the Mountain Lake Hotel in Western Maryland where Martha and her brother spent much of their childhood. Grimes earned her B.A. and M.A. at the University of Maryland. She has taught at the University of Iowa, Frostburg State University, and Montgomery College.

Grimes is best known for her series of novels featuring Richard Jury, an inspector with Scotland Yard, and his friend Melrose Plant, a British aristocrat who has given up his titles. Each of the Jury mysteries is named after a pub. Her page-turning, character-driven tales fall into the mystery subdivision of "cozies." In 1983, Grimes received the Nero Wolfe Award for best mystery of the year for The Anodyne Necklace.

The background to Hotel Paradise is drawn on the experiences she enjoyed spending summers at her mother's hotel in Mountain Lake Park, Maryland. One of the characters, Mr Britain, is drawn on Britten Leo Martin, Sr, who then ran Marti's Store which he owned with his father and brother. Martin's Store is accessible by a short walkway from Mountain Lake, the site of the former Hotel, which was torn down in 1967.

She splits her time between homes in Washington, D.C., and Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Reviews

[Pam · Rating 4 out of 5]

Since Martha Grimes is one of my favorite authors and has blessed my life with good writing and memorable characters, I was surprised initially to see the focus of this memoir. But reading her story and now knowing about her battle with alcohol, I have more insight into her novels and appreciate them even more. Now I understand young Emma's knowledge of making mixed drinks in the Hotel Paradise series and all the drinking that took place with the aunt upstairs and the business partner downstairs. Alcohol permeated her childhood, so no wonder it became an issue as an adult. And now I know why the Richard Jury novels are each named after a pub in England. It wasn't just a quirky name...or was it? The pubs were much more than a place to drink. And she is much more than alcohol. It may have been an addiction, but it didn't own her or change the brilliant scope of her work. When we read all of an author's books, don't we feel we know them? Now...all the more. Add in meeting her son, Ken. It's no wonder he experienced the same addictions, with his own special twist of suffering.

I was caught off guard to find so many similarities between alcoholism and depression. At the root of both are loneliness, fear, anger, insecurity, isolation. Both increase the isolation and are destructive physically and emotionally.

"It's as if I were born without the ability to process certain feelings, and I'm still overwhelmed by them today...A degree of pain will be with me forever. It's more formless than that, to be restless, irritable, and discontent...I've come to realize that no matter how I feel, I shouldn't take it too seriously, because three hours from now, I'll feel differently."

"I have a wardrobe of illusions."

[Susan · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book was so approachable. Much of it read like a conversation over tea and biscuits with Martha and Ken Grimes. Growing up in an alcoholic household, so many things in this book rang true for me. While this is a nonfiction, I have no problem saying that I connected with both of the authors. I especially appreciated each talking about how society’s treatment of alcoholics has changed over the decades. While both entered into treatment, each chose different paths. One is an atheist and one is not. One went with Alcoholics Anonymous and one with a private clinic. While one toyed with drugs, the other did not.

On a more poignant level, the authors talk about Ken growing up with an alcoholic parent and never being sure of when or how Martha’s mood would swing. Additionally, Martha talks of her summers working at the family hotel and alcoholic mood swings of the manager – friendly and funny to furious in zero seconds flat. Their discussions of the constant vigilance, if not out right battle, against falling back into the bottle showed how strong a person needs to be to kick any addiction. They also have a great discussion about whether or not alcoholism should be considered a medical disease. It is not a question I had pondered before this book and has given me something to chew on.

Narration: Kate Reading and Holter Graham were perfect choices for the voices of Martha Grimes and Ken Grimes. They provided a clear narration of what was at times a difficult subject. I especially liked the sections that were conversations back and forth between Martha and Ken.

[Amy · Rating 1 out of 5]

Many years ago, I had a love affair with Martha Grimes and her Richard Jury mysteries. I devoured them and couldn't wait to get to the next. It was a happy day for me when a new one came out and I adored the characters in these books and the lives they led. Unfortunately, the novels began to go down hill and ultimately ceased to be mysteries. I'm not sure what the heck they were but they were rambling and dull and I stopped reading them and consequently wrote off Martha Grimes.

Imagine my surprise when I recently read that Martha Grimes and her son wrote a dual memoir about their alcohol addiction. I couldn't help but think; "AHA! This is why her books began to stink, she was drunk!"

Alas, I do not know if this is true or not because I could not get through the first fifty freaking pages of this book. Rambling would be a compliment. Incoherent would be closer. What in the hell is she talking about? I don't know and now I don't care.

[Connie N. · Rating 3 out of 5]

I was mildly interested in this book because several of my family members are dealing with, or have dealt with, alcoholism and other addictions. What I found most interesting about this book were the different responses and attitudes expressed by the mother/son writing team. As expected, I found Martha's chapters to be straightforward and in-your-face, but she'd go off on tangents that I didn't really understand, getting too much into the research and less about her feelings. Ken wrote about the problems of his growing up years and the difficulties of overcoming alcoholism at a younger age, much more personal and emotional chapters. My favorite part of the book was the Q&A "conversation" between mother and son as they debated various aspects of the disease/addiction, reasons for drinking, etc. Interesting that they have such different points of view but ended up coming to the same conclusions.

Interesting quote on why Martha chose to stop drinking, "Why stop? My health was in no immediate danger; drinking wasn't affecting my writing output. So why stop? Because I couldn't. And if I couldn't, something other than my own dimwittedness was in complete control of me. Thus, my inability to stop began to outweigh the pleasure of drinking."

A discussion about the non-drinker's inability to understand the problem: "It leads us back to reason: why people struggle with bringing reason to a problem that is not conducive to reason. You cannot reason a problem out of existence when the problem resists reason at every single turn. The irony is that the only thing any of us has to use in dealing with problems is reason, or logic. Here is someone who appears to be ruining his own life and the life of other people. What can we use except reason and logic? But that's not going to get you very far. So what are you going to do?"

A quote about anger (and other feelings), "...I still have to work to contain my anger. Now I realize that my feelings were the tail that wagged the dog. I couldn't live with them. Other people seem to manage fear, loneliness, and disappointment without having to kill them with a chemical or raging at someone or something. It's as if I were born without the ability to process certain feelings and I'm still overwhelmed by them today."

[Samantha · Rating 2 out of 5]

Thought this book would be interesting- I enjoy memoirs & my father is a recovered alcoholic. The son, Ken's passages are a big more compelling than the mother, Martha's. However, this book was not what I expected and put it down in favor of spending time reading something more enjoyable.

[Jonathan Garrett · Rating 5 out of 5]

I received this book from a Goodreads first reads giveaway. This book was a really good read. The authors made themselves and there problems seem very human and relatable - no preaching, just real life. I would recommend this book!

[Dorothy Smock · Rating 1 out of 5]

I love the Richard Jury mysteries although they have definitely gone downhill. I wish she had written another one of those instead of this book. I guess she is a dry drunk and that's why her books have taken on the morose tone they now have. I wish she had taken her son's road to recovery and we could now be enjoying Jury and friends. What a waste of time this book was. I feel sorry for her son--he was right to not want to write this book.

[Kristi Lamont · Rating 2 out of 5]

What I term a really good "recovery memoir" will usually make me want to go fix a glass or pour up a pint or shot of whatever our author is imbibing as his or her alcoholic beverage of choice, just from the vivid descriptions of the Scotch or the condensation on a glass or the atmosphere of a smoky bar or evocation of the chill of the wine on first sip. (Even though I don't like Scotch and can't be in a smoke-filled room for longer than about five minutes without nearly falling out. And, FTR, if I read a book in which people are all eating vividly described cheeseburgers at a diner, well, a cheeseburger it must be for me!) Sadly, Martha Grimes made me never care if I ever had a vodka martini. And I would not want to share a pint with Ken Grimes. Sigh. It's harsh to say about one of my favorite writers, but I think Ms Grimes pushed her son to write this book so they could make some fast $$$. Sloppy writing, sloppy editing, and it really pains me to say that given how much I love her fiction. I struggled to stay awake reading this (in broad daylight, quite sober) up until page 94 of 213 pages, when I finally gave up.

[Liz Pardey · Rating 3 out of 5]

My name is Eiizabeth and I'm an addiction addict. The good old story of a descent into the hell of alcoholism/drugs/anorexia and the struggle out. You know, start with the flawed childhood, sneaking Daddy's bourbon and Mom's Valium, flunking out of grade 8 because you were always smoking weed in the washroom, three divorces due to my adultery until I discover AAA/my obsessive-compulsive disorder/God
Martha Grimes; a writer of mediocre mysteries and her son, both former alcoholics are co-authors although thereis little actual interplay. I was, frankly, very disappointed. There is no real coherent time line, they only communicate in three dialogues when they discuss AAA vs other treatments. Somehow they just don't seem to care.
Another disappointment was that Ms Grimes is writing down to us in her mystery novels. A lot of what she says, the literary background she has, seem to show that she's just turning out the Richard Jurys, not too much effort expended, just get a new one to the publisher every year or so and keep that revenue stream

[Susan · Rating 2 out of 5]

I won this book as a Goodreads First Reads Giveaway.

I was very happy to have won this book because the subject of Alcoholism is one near and dear to my heart. My Grandfather is recovering alcoholic, my Uncle is an alcoholic and I, myself, have had a very real struggle with alcohol. It always interests me to see how others cope with their illness and how families can persevere. With that being said, I was very disappointed with this memoir. I knew that I would be getting both points of view but I was expecting it to be a little more cohesive than it was. While I realize that having two people, "speaking" may not always lend itself to the smoothest read, I know that it can, actually. This felt very random even within the one voice. While I have that criticism, I feel that I must say I'm not sure how they could have made it better? Was each story written with a beginning, middle, end and then broken up into chapters? It didn't feel that way to me. It seemed as if they each had a random thought of their recovery and they wrote it down and shared it.
Lastly, I feel I should comment on Ms. Grimes's point of view most of all. While I don't feel entitled to comment on anyone's struggle with alcohol or how they go about getting or staying sober, after all, it is such a different journey for each of us, I will since I was asked to give my honest opinion here. I felt at many times during her convoluted rants that I wanted to shout out, "Please just go have a drink already!"

[Linda Caminiti · Rating 4 out of 5]

I know there are a zillion books on addiction but this one is different because it's told from two points of view. Two stories unfold...that of the alcoholic mother and that of the addicted son. Each give their once perspective on addiction, how they deal with it and how it has affected their lives. Martha Grimes is a famous murder mystery writer, the author of the Richard Jury series. Her son became addicted to drugs of all kinds in his early teens. He anted to be the cool guy until his friends started calling him "Spent Ken". He almost dies from his addiction. His story is more about how he became an addict and what drove him there. His mother's is more about how difficult it is to be an alcoholic and to stay sober. I believe we all have people around us that are addicted to something, alcohol, gambling, drugs etc. So this is a very insightful look into the lives of those trying to stay sober and clean.

[Whistler's Mom · Rating 5 out of 5]

A mother and son with the same problem and two very different solutions.

I was surprised to find this book so fascinating. As a life-long abstainer, I have no frame of reference for addiction to alcohol or anything else (except reading.) I'm not a fan of "recovery" memoirs. While I like Martha Grimes' mysteries (the earlier ones, anyway) she's not my favorite writer.

Yet I've read this book several times and I love it. I think it shows what we all should know - that "alcoholism" is a BIG word. There's no one answer to how or why someone becomes an alcoholic or the best way to stop being one. This mother and son are close and in some ways, very much alike. Yet their stories could come from different planets.

Part of it is a generational thing. Ken Grimes grew up in a free-wheeling era when excess was the norm, not the exception. He comes from a generation that values openness and spreading the word. His mother comes from a generation which hid many behaviors and swept others under the rug. Not to do so was to invite social and professional ruin.

There's also the fact that Ken is male and Martha is female. OK, Betty Ford and others brought female alcoholism into the light of day and did away with some of the stigma, but it's still viewed differently. I remember when a drunk character on television was a legitimate source of comedy, as long as the drunk was a man. Women alcoholics had to hide their addictions very carefully. To some extent, I think they still do.

The whole view of alcohol consumption and its value or danger has changed so much during my lifetime that it's hard to keep up. There was a time when "You're not going to drive are you?" "I have to, I'm too drunk to walk" was good, light humor. I man who could "hold his liquor" (without showing signs of drunkenness) was admired. Never mind what it was doing to his liver.

We believed that Jews never became alcoholics because wine was part of their religious observations. Wrong! That women alcoholics were sluts with no morals. Wrong again! And on and on. Most of what we thought we knew about alcoholism has proved to be wrong.

This mother and son became alcoholics via different routes. She was the child of a hard-working mother who never showed emotion. When she told her small children that their father was dead, she immediately said, "Don't cry." She can't have been an easy mother to grow up with, but she wasn't an alcoholic and neither was Martha's father.

Martha's role model was the hard-drinking woman who had invested in her mother's hotel. The message there was that drinking is FUN. Hard work, not so much.

Martha was disciplined and a hard worker herself as a teen and young woman. She had no choice, since family backing to get the education she craved wasn't there. She learned to drink as a graduate student. So a late starter, but she embraced it enthusiastically, even marrying another alchoholic student.

Ken has the background we expect of an alcoholic. A rather spoiled child of divorced parents, he learned early that hanging with the stoners was easier than doing school work. His mother was convinced the expensive private schools he attended shielded him from bad behaviors, but she was wrong.

Mind you, she showed little or no realization of the extent of her dependence on alcohol and how deeply interwoven it had become in her life style. Her friends were all two-fisted drinkers and she was simply going along with the crowd. That most of them were intelligent, successful people made their alcoholism look much less dangerous than it was. And having your 12-year-old son serve as the bartender at your parties? The ultimate joke. What harm could it possibly do?

Ironically, it was Ken who first realized that he needed to break the grip of alcohol. He choose Alcoholics Anonymous and is still active in the "twelve step" program. After the son sobered up, the mother felt she had to follow suit. She didn't like the idea of exposing herself at AA meetings, so she used an out-patient rehab center to get sober.

Perhaps it's typical of a professional writer and her non-writer son that she was the one who wanted to write a joint book about alcoholism. He's willing to spill his guts at AA meetings, but hesitant to put his mistakes into writing. She's uncomfortable with the meetings approach to sobriety, but quite willing to write an honest book in which she admits some embarassing things.

They started writing in 2002 and it took them ten years to get the book written and published. Because of Martha Grimes' popularity as a writer of mysteries, publishing houses were enthusiastic and they've reached a wider audience than most recovering alcoholics.

And which one made the best choice of how to get sober? No way to know, but it's telling that Ken is a Bible-thumping advocate of AA and proud of his long time sobriety. Martha Grimes still wishes she could drink and have fun like she used to. She knows she can't, but she regrets giving up the lifestyle that meant so much to her and which was centered around booze.

I think Ken Grimes is more open than his mother, but that, too, may be a generational thing. As she says wisely, no parent and child ever agrees about much of anything and they are no exception. He's convinced she was lucky to grow up in an "innocent" time without the temptations and anxieties he knew as a child. She's convinced he was damned lucky to have a successful parent who could provide him with the luxuries she never knew growing up. Both are absolutely correct, which is what makes this book so interesting.

I can't call it inspirational, since it didn't inspire me to start drinking so I could find God and stop drinking. It's just a great read, which feeds MY addiction.

[Laurian · Rating 4 out of 5]

I've read quite a few books on alcoholism at this point and this one is by far the most personal and thoughtful response.

[Kristi · Rating 1 out of 5]

As a psychologist with 36 years of sobriety and a fan of Martha Grimes's Richard Jury mysteries for decades, I thought this memoir of alcoholism for a mother and son might be an interesting read. I believe that Ken Grimes is healthier emotionally than his mother. He believes in the tenets of AA, practices the steps, and has found outlets for and expression of the anger in his life that contributed to his alcoholism. Martha, on the other hand, seems to be what is called a "dry drunk". There seems to have been little change in her life or insight. She is not drinking, but is obsessed with alcohol to the point of wishing herself into a Robert B. Parker mystery where Spenser is having a beer. I truly believe that you do not stop drinking or using drugs by attempting to analyze the reasons / causes of your path to death. First you must stop thru AA meetings and/or inpatient / outpatient intervention. I do not, however, as Martha and to some extent Ken do, disparage therapy..... I will use myself as the example. Friends did an intervention. I entered treatment believing that I was not an alcoholic. I was simply depressed. On each of the successive nights of my initial days in the hospital I found myself completely unable to sleep. I had done sufficient damage to my nervous system that every time I began to fall asleep my body would spasm due to the misfiring of neurons. As a college teacher of psychology, this realization of the damage my "little alcohol problem" was having on my valuable mind was the event that convinced me of my alcoholism. As I reconstructed my history of drinking, I saw its extent and degree. Immediately after leaving treatment I went to an AA meeting where a man stood and said he had 33 years of sobriety. I wondered if I would ever be able to make that statement. I hoped I could make it to 33 days. I had planned to visit meetings last spring for my 35th anniversary, but covid intervened. I hoped the fact that I could say I have 35 years of sobriety might have the impact on even one person that the man at my first AA meeting had on me. It was also meant to be a celebration. Again the first task is to stop drinking - AA and its steps were essential to me for the first few years. Once I or many alcoholics are recovering it is often essential to heal the emotional factors that contributed to the use of alcohol and/or drugs. Therapy has an important role later down the path. In my case the alcohol was anesthesia for and a barrier to memories of profound childhood abuse. AA cannot / should not attempt to heal psychological trauma. A great therapist helped me heal...... I am grateful that I have never craved alcohol. I am blessed. I have never liked the concept in AA that starting drinking again is a "slip". It is as though you can work as hard as possible on remaining sober through AA and all other means and suddenly someone throws a banana peel in your path. Ooops. I hate it when that happens. Drinking or not drinking on every day is a choice, not a banana peel..... Finally I found the book to be redundant and often frankly boring. If you are thinking about becoming sober or are early in the process, I would not recommend this book. Kristi & Abby Tabby

[Regina Gluchowski · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book really annoyed me. Yet I wanted to finish it. It definitely paints the picture that all people are individuals and alcoholism can present itself in different ways, even among ways to deal with it and understand it, between a mother and son.
I much more enjoyed Ken’s writing. There was more of a story and enjoyment to it. His writing was much more related to the topic of alcoholism. Martha’s writing just seemed whining with a little bit of romantic feeling to it … focusing on the romance of alcohol. She also wrote a lot about writing books in general. I actually got more tips out of that (being an aspiring writer) than her thoughts on alcoholism.
I do appreciate that they took the time and effort to write and have the book published as a mother and son team. I did not enjoy reading how many negative opinions Martha shared for AA. It seemed as if she was purposely having a different point of view (about AA and the topic of ‘denial’ than her son, just to have it.
For example; her complaint about people, places and things being triggers (and that AA suggests that alcoholics avoid all triggers /people places and things that trigger them) is not accurate. AA suggests alcoholics are powerless over people, places and things. AA does not suggest alcoholics avoid all triggers in life or people, places and things that trigger them. In fact the Big Book of AA devotes a significant amount of suggestions towards being of service to others, regardless of triggers.
I respect her opinion of not wanting to belong to AA but it seemed that she had a lot of pompous complaints about it for not truly understanding it.
Maybe that is why I wanted to finish it though. It wasn’t sugar coated. It was truly both of their personal thoughts.

[Julie · Rating 4 out of 5]

This started off strong, with some interesting and sometimes poetic observations about drinking, and why people drink. The two authors come at it from very different angles. Ken’s observations definitely reminded me of people In my life with serious drinking problems. But after the first few chapters the book devolved into anecdotes about boozing and recovery, and became much less interesting. It probably should have been a pair of essays rather than an entire book.

[Patrick · Rating 3 out of 5]

Not what I expected

I think I expected more insight and less memoir. My impression is that mother and son, while having very different views of getting free of alcohol, just seem to think everyone has a problem. From the book, I don’t quite see Martha’s problem - though Ken was definitely a classic addict!

[Shirley Mytnowych · Rating 3 out of 5]

I read this book not expecting spectacular writing or to be thrilled, but simply for the topic. This is like walking into an open AA meeting and listening to a speaker tell their story. I found the 2 different perspectives interesting and related much more to Ken. This book will probably only appeal to those people close to the topic.

[Emilayday Adamcyk · Rating 3 out of 5]

It was a fast read. I liked a lot of what the son had to say and his writing, the mom seemed to be trying to say something really wise or quotable but ended up talking in weird rambling fragments a lot. It was an okay read in the recovery genre.

[Andy Plonka · Rating 3 out of 5]

This is not the book you would read to cure your fondness for alcoholic beverages, but it does give good insight into the life of an alcoholic. The best advice seems to be examining why you got hooked in the first place and deciding whether or not you have the ability to confront these problems.

[Chelsea Mullen · Rating 1 out of 5]

This book is an underwhelming combination of bad writing and bad editing that results in an essentially incoherent manuscript.

[Jitka Špičanová · Rating 3 out of 5]

Memoáry alko rodinky, hodně bavilo. Člověk se nedozvěděl nic přelomového, hodně beletristicky laděné, čtivé. Zhltla jsem to.

[Shana Yates · Rating 4 out of 5]

3.5 stars

[Brigitte · Rating 4 out of 5]

5 stars for the Martha chapters, 2 stars for the Ken chapters

[Laura · Rating 3 out of 5]

This felt like too much and not enough at the same time.

[Judith · Rating 3 out of 5]

This was an interesting take on alcoholism, with dual narrators: a mother and her son. Both are recovering alcoholics, and since they are from two different generations, their addictions contrast sharply. Whereas the mother pictures frosty martinis, the son seeks mostly chemical alteration through pharmaceuticals. Because I am an oldster, I related to the mother's story even though martinis are not my chosen form of poison. She had a gift for language and she is the author of a series of mystery novels and won prizes for her other books.

I liked what she said about stopping drinking because it seems to apply to stopping any harmful behavior:

"You don't stop drinking by analyzing; You don't stop drinking by understanding why you do it or 'reasonably' deciding to cut back; You stop by stopping. This is bad news. It's hard to think you can't somehow nibble around the edges of a problem, maybe suck on the lemon twist or the olive; that maybe you can cut this quitting into workable parts."

And her thoughts on the over used advice for dieting, drinking, etc., which is to substitute new habit, food, drink, etc. :

"What? Are these books kidding? Nothing can take the place of that frosty martini on the bar. . . ." She goes on to explain that it could be argued that anything you would choose to take the place of the drink would simply be enhanced by drinking at the same time.

But my favorite passage was about our children growing up and away:
"The story of parents and children is one of tragic implications. Its success depends on separation. It's as if, between the shutting and opening of a door, or turning away and turning back, everything changes. You wonder about a child: where did you go?"

[Chaitra · Rating 2 out of 5]

Here's the thing. Had it been only a memoir of alcoholism and not a dual one, it would have been much better. I admit I picked it up because it was a mother and son dual thing, but it didn't make for a coherent book. The focus was all over the place.

I'm mostly in the minority with this opinion. But, for me, Martha's story of her struggle with alcoholism and the difficulties she faced with overcoming it was much more palatable than Ken's. Ken, I'm not sure I connected with. He had the more humane elements whereas Martha had the answers, but I still liked Martha's portions better. I think that had to do with how their respective portions were written. Or something.

The subject was would-be interesting. I'm not an alcoholic, nor have I known anyone who was one, but I'm interested in addictive behavior. But this memoir was just too convoluted for me to make sense. Just as I would be getting into a voice and the story, the narrative cut, without any rhyme or reason, to the other person. Not exactly the brightest of ideas to splice the memoir that way. 2 stars.

I received a copy of the book for review via NetGalley.

[Vilo · Rating 3 out of 5]

Martha Grimes is the author of the Richard Jury and other mysteries. Her son Ken works in the publishing industry. She convinced him that they should write a dual memoir of their respective struggles with alcoholism (and in Ken's case other drug abuse) and how they each moved on. Each chapter is an individual essay by one or the other on some aspect of their experience. I love Martha Grimes' writing, but I especially appreciated Ken's chapters because he is so straight forward and compelling in his account--and perhaps his approach is one that resonates more with me. The book does make you wonder what mildly addictive behaviors you might have and how they might interfere with your life. Martha says that her alcoholism never affected her work or ability to function, and yet in both their descriptions of Ken's growing up years it is clear that her involvement with alcohol may well have interfered with her ability to see her son's struggles in life. One of the friends Ken made in recovery says that he's not sure why he felt that one shouldn't have pain in life (and therefore why he tried to dull all pain with drugs/alcohol). An interesting read.

[Carole Yeaman · Rating 3 out of 5]

Martha comes across grumpy, cynical, unempathetic & the only one with "all the answers" - someone with a permanent hangover. Although admirably "dry" for 20 years through her own willpower (and a couple of hospitalizations which she doesn't describe at all), she ends the book with definitive renouncement of the substance which was the only way she felt she could connect "not simply with other people but with myself and with the world."

Ken, her beleguered yet uncomplaining son, displays a much more human and multifaceted person who is open to the world as his reformed alcoholic parents (long divorced) are closed to it. One difference may be that has gone through AA and believes in the saving grace of the "higher power".

Regardless, we are shown many approaches to solving or ignoring the "disease" (Martha & Ken cannot agree on even this concept) as the two of them bump through their separate lives & witness interesting lessons from others similarly-challenged.

[Martha Bratton · Rating 4 out of 5]

I had no idea of what to expect from this book, but I wanted to read it because I think I've read every Grimes book and I was stunned to hear about her alcoholism. Martha Grimes doesn't mince words, so this is an eloquent confrontation of a spooky problem. The focus is on what works and what doesn't--AA vs. clinics. She and her son come at the issues from different angles, and I now know more than I ever wanted to now about how difficult it is for an alcoholic to stop drinking.

I have had alcoholics in my life but never understood why they "chose" to drink. It turns out that "why" is not the issue. The back and forth between Grimes and Grimes is not medical or scientific so much as anecdotal. As in her books, her witty sparkle shines through whatever she is talking about.

She helped her son get a job in publishing, which I have always considered a hard-drinking environment. But that is not what started him drinking and drugging.


I'm glad I read it.