though it pains me to say it, there are so many things wrong with this book. it pains me because 1) i was totally excited to read this because of the reviews- both slj and booklist gave it great reviews, booklist even starred it, and 2) i hate to criticize any gay teen lit, esp. new stuff and lesbian stuff, because i am just so happy that people are writing it, it's getting published, and it's in my library. but i actually had to get out a notepad to write down all of the things that were bugging me while i was reading because i couldn't keep track of them all. i think partly what kept me reading was that i wanted to see what other ridiculous stuff was in there.
first of all i couldn't stand the way the narrator, laura, talked, both to the reader and to other characters in the book. they all talked ridiculously unrealistically, at least in my opinion. i could be wrong, but i don't think teenagers say "lezbo," "fembo," and "blazin'" quite so much. laura also had weird ways of saying things like, "i couldn't give three cracked coconuts." umm, okay... i've read plenty of teen lit in my adult years so i am well-versed in the cheesy dialogue, contrived plots, and melodramatics. i really enjoyed freak show by james st. james even though it had all these things (and more!). but down to the bone was just not good. sorry.
inconsistencies abound in this book- one minute laura is completely clueless, asking someone what a genderqueer is, then the next she is throwing around the word "andro." later in the book she's explaining how feminine-looking gay girls versus butch girls or bois are in bed, when she's only been with her one secret girlfriend, has virtually no exposure to gay people/culture, and still isn't considering herself gay. it's just way too obvious that the author is trying to explain all these things to the reader, wanting to define every possible gay term and tell every possible version of a coming out story. there's the guy who tells the story of his brother who was trans and not accepted by their father and committed suicide- handled all to casually, by the way. mention of stds and aids, tons and tons of labeling- boi, butch, femme, t-girl, genderqueer, etc., etc. the author seemed to want to have a character to represent all these "types" of people but unfortunately they are all terribly one dimensional.
oh and the overt persecusion they face! maybe i am naiive, but not all "straights" hate the gays. just about every insult is thrown at these people and just about every character in the book who is not gay hates the gays and is not afraid to let them know.
the general mood in the book is also inconsistent. like the suicide story- it came up out of nowhere and then just as quickly they were on to a different topic. another time laura's work crew is having quite a heated argument about gay people. a few moments later she is reflecting that she is going to miss all the "good times" she and her crew have together.
the author also apparently thinks readers can't deduce anything for themselves so she has to spell it all out. laura explains that she can tell someone was a kind, thoughtful person, rather than just let readers figure that out from the character's actions. describing someone by saying she's "feminine looking" and then describing her dress, earrings, etc. is redundant. and repetitive. ;)
and my last complaint is that the author kept putting emphasis on certain words, sometimes excessively, and sometimes even on the wrong word. for instance, "here i am thinking i'd be HER type, and she ends up going for YOU." shouldn't it be, "here i am thinking I'D be her type, and she ends up going for YOU"?
i don't know, maybe my expectations were too high. maybe i'm too old, i'm not cuban, and i don't live in miami so i don't get it. i hope that's the case cuz i do still hope that lots and lots of teenagers read this book if it might educate them just a little bit. or help them find comfort in a character that's like themselves. i just wish the lessons were a bit more subtle.