This book delves into Halloween symbols and their history. As someone who enjoys Halloween, I'm wiling to give most things Halloween a try. The campy 1970s illustrations have certain charm. But I found this book's content to be barely fair. The generalities match the standard history of Halloween, but I disagree with many of the details.
I thought the author jumped to a lot of conclusions not substantiated by any evidence, and I disliked how folklore unsupported by any historical documentation or archaeology was presented as fact. The basis for the author's knowledge of witches, witches' sabbaths, and witches' familiars appears to be the confessions of accused witches given under torture, which isn't a valid source. She also conflates practitioners of "witchcraft" with polytheistic non-Christians and presents them as members of a single, unified, organized religion on par with Christianity. This is wildly inaccurate.
The author also voices some opinions that show a failure to understand history in context. For example, she says that the stereotypical ugly wicked witch while it may appear to be "just colorful and part of holiday fun" is actually "a distortion of history and perhaps a disservice to women in their struggle for equality" (page 42). This may just be a dated feminist barb, but it shows a lack of understanding of symbols.
Symbols evolve and change over time. Something that begins as negative can become positive and vica versa. Symbols also have no innate meaning. They only hold meaning because they are ascribed that meaning, and they cease to have a particular meaning or any meaning if a person or group stops believing it. Something's origin doesn't dictate how it will be used or perceived over time.
Part of the reason that the fallacy of presentism is so prevalent is that modern people suffer from the inability to understand that people who lived in different times believed different things and that people in future generations will believe different things than we do now. The lack of a complete knowledge of history and, therefore, the inability to place things within the correct historical context gives rise to the desire to remove anything that makes people in contemporary societies feel uncomfortable. We would erase all of human history if we seek to excise everything that was ever associated with anything deemed objectionable by current standards. The intention may be noble, but the practice is foolhardy and potentially dangerous. Sanitizing human history won't atone for past injustice. Editing the wicked witch out of Halloween celebrations will not somehow make reparations for the elderly, poor, disabled, unattractive, and marginalized women who were falsely accused of witchcraft in centuries past.