Adam Swift’s Political Philosophy is an outstanding introduction. The challenge for those new to the subject is twofold: understanding the current state and history of political philosophy; and then examining the issues within logical frameworks that are free from internal contradiction. Readers will already have established their own points of view on many issues, but Swift introduces the historical context and current debate with such non-judgmental ease that it is easy to appreciate both sides of arguments without threat to personal beliefs. Rather than the opinionated (and often distorted) arguments we see daily from politicians and pundits, Swift presents a balanced set of considerations that will make readers consider why they hold particular views, whether those views are internally consistent, and where (and how) debate should be focused as governments try to reconcile their citizens’ different preferences.
Swift breaks his book into five sections: social justice, liberty, equality, community, and democracy. Social justice is different than the retributive justice administered by the criminal justice system, and has to do with “society’s key social and economic institutions, which crucially determine the distribution of benefits and burdens.” John Rawls’ 1971 book 'A Theory of Justice' launched the political philosophy discourse from its prior focus on the history of political thought into its current focus on ‘justice’ and the type of society we want to live in, and it is Rawls’ book that Swift uses as a starting point for discussion. Swift quickly introduces a libertarian counterpoint text by Robert Nozick (Rawls’ contemporary and Harvard colleague), who argues that, unlike Rawls’ egalitarian viewpoint, “justice is not about agreeing fair principles by imagining that we don’t know how lucky or unlucky we have been in the natural or social lottery. It is about respecting people’s right to self-ownership and their right to hold property….”
By using Rawls and Nozick as a type of shorthand base for today’s left-wing and right-wing political thought, Swift ensures the rest of the book is relevant to contemporary societal and political issues, even as he continues to fortify the framework via references to historical political thought (Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Kant, Nietzsche, Hayek). In addition to providing current context to ancient concepts such as liberty, equality and community, and to our more recent development – democracy – Swift also spends considerable time discussing the latest academic thoughts and developments, and ends each chapter with a suggested reading list, complete with helpful comments. The academic debate, like our political and social institutions, is a work in progress.
Most helpful, though, are Swift’s many contemporary examples that highlight each of the issues as they are discussed. The philosophical underpinnings can be oblique or dense, but the topical examples give readers immediate grasp of the issues. (This third edition has updated many examples, e.g. from Tiger Woods to Usain Bolt, which will be particularly helpful to younger students.) Political Philosophy is unusual for its combination of readability and depth, and its deft distillation of complex concepts into practical application. It can and should be enjoyed by a far wider range of readers than its stated audience of students and politicians.