The author has the merit of opposing Islamist fundamentalist ideology...however, her particular brand of feminism is so aggressive and off-putting as to be offensive and in fact tends to contribute to the Islamist anti-feminist narrative providing them with ammunition sponsored by what appears a strong anti-masculine bias. The author is highly Manichean in her description of international geopolitics. She could do far more with much less.
While there were certainly some positive points made in this title the rampant and virulent feminist diatribe by Bennoune makes the book difficult to get through a boring and relentless diatribe that never ceases pushing the feminist agenda down the reader's throat. While women's rights matter and are certainly important they are not the only issue involved in the fight against Islamic fundamentalism as Bennoune's writing would lead one to believe.
Her endless tirade makes what would otherwise be an interesting piece of research a drudge. Additionally, Bennoune takes sides against both those who combat terrorism (whom she depicts as human rights abusers) and the fundamentalists themselves with equal vigour. The author tends to place the cart before the horse by decrying renditions and other measures that have been used in the past (which were of decidedly questionable value) yet fails to recognize that were there no terrorism such questionable practices would never have existed in the first place.
Her often presumptive attacks often lack empirical evidence, which discredits her narrative and undermines the validity of many of her emotionally laden assertions. I am sure she is convinced of the validity of her position, however,
-While she gets a few points right (luckily) she gets many others wrong. For instance, Bennoune boasts of hearing the terrible sound of a rocket in Kabul in 1996, and then goes on to state (without evidence) that "Someone far away in the United States or Germany had made the thing (the rocket), had made money off it." A sort of villainous "Daddy Warbucks."She then goes on, correctly to point out that "Afghanistan does not manufacture rockets." What she failed to indicate was that such rockets were left over Soviet munitions or more likely Chinese 107mm rockets, which were frequently used during my time in Afghanistan. The rockets were definitely not of U.S. or German origin! However, Bennoune appears to believe she can just make unfounded accusations without evidence to spice-up her tale.
I would recommend skipping her introduction unless the reader is of a masochistic bent and wishes to subject themselves to the repeated beat of the feminist drum.
Chapter 1 is a decided improvement after having suffered through the introduction.
Bennoune consistently asserts her belief in the power of peaceful resistance, however, fails to see the violent reality of the spreading scourge of Islamist fundamentalism. While the author justifiably laments over the loss of life, particularly for those of what she terms "Muslim heritage," and more pointedly that of female Muslims, she fails to understand and appears blind to the fact that there is an absolute necessity for an armed military response to the never-ending cycle of bloodletting. Of course negotiations and the needs of civil society are also necessary but they cannot be addressed until the tide of fundamentalist violence has first been stemmed. On page 360 Bennonune notes, "...I am more and more convinced that vigilant optimism is the best stance in this difficult moment." in other words, cross your fingers and hope it all goes away.
Another annoying aspect of the book is that everything comes back to her, her father and Algeria as though this were the ultimate baseline for the measurement of what is important.
Generally speaking, I made the following observations:
p. 87 a depiction of the intolerance of liberal feminists: "If he doesn't shake my hand I will give him a smack," remarks a certain Dr. Sow...so although feminists decry violence projected against them, they are apparently free to administer it as they see fit.
P. 89 Ranting and raving one into a boredom-induced hypnotic sleep.
Chapter III becomes nearly as oppressive as the introduction and I found it of limited value to the discussion.
The inordinate use of accolades in her descriptions of those she admires: Everyone Bennoune approves of is either brilliant, amazing, or entitled to some other meaningless and unnecessary acclamation.
p. 1 "learned," P. 88 "classic," p. 89 an international powerhouse," p. 89 "amazingly," p. 238 "legendary," p.314 "prominent," p.132 "prestigious," p.132 exhilarating," p.136 "most famous,"p.353 "universally loved," p.366 "unforgettable," p.360 "brilliant," p.365 "precious," p.357 "eloquent," p. 354 "gifted,"
On the other hand, anyone that Ms Bennoune dislikes is condemned and treated with the utmost contempt and disdain. Whether or not you like George Bush, the former U.S. President and his policies there was absolutely no call to label him "lamentable. (p.239)" as Bennoune saw fit. By the same token, The author describes Abdelaziz Bouteflika as "...a seventy-seven-year-old...stroke patient who changed the constitution to stay in office for a fourth term." Again, one does not have to approve or agree with the politics of an individual, but to describe them by the adoption of such biased and slanted reduces any legitimacy and integrity on the part of a writer.
While the title has some elements worth considering the way they are presented diminished their importance. The fight against fundamentalism is not a "female" problem it is a "people" problem, an "education" problem, and a "social-justice" problem. The brand of feminism being fomented by Bennoune and like-minded individuals is non-inclusive and entirely divisive. Their exclusive focus upon female issues overrides the larger picture making it impossible to see the forest for the trees. While female rights are undeniably important and core to the debate on political Islam, they are not, and should not be the driving force and are not mutually exclusive of all the other ancillary issues either.
While Bennoune has an important message to convey she does it in such a way as to diminish its overall value. The title, in my personal opinion, has merit and contributes to the debate, it is unfortunate in the way it was crafted.