AN ESSENTIAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
Jeshajahu Weinberg (1918-2000), Founding Director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, wrote in the introductory section of this 1993 book, “[The] Museum is the American memorial to the victims of the Holocaust… the museum fulfills its … function primarily through … mass education rather than merely through sculptural aesthetics… The museum has been built to tell America and the world the factual story of this most terrible event in modern history, and to illuminate the crucial moral lessons it entails… The main task… [is to] tell the American public as clearly and comprehensively as possible what happened in that darkest chapter of human history…
“The museum does not undertake to explain why the Holocaust happened. This question has yet to be answered by the historians, and it is doubtful whether such answer will ever go beyond the limits of unprovable hypothesis and speculation… The museum restricts itself meticulously to answering the question of HOW it happened… only a survivor of the Holocaust can fully know and understand what happened in those terrible years, but the world has to know the story of the Holocaust… and in order to be remembered it has to be seen---and told… By no means does this thematic distinction preclude the inclusion of materials pertaining to other genocidal events, such as the Middle Passage of African slaves … in the museum’s library and archives or in its educational activities.
“To preclude definitively revisionist declarations by antisemitic pseudo-scholars who try to ‘prove’ that the Holocaust never happened, the museum … restrict[ed] itself … solely to genuine artifacts and documentary photographic material with proven provenance… Moreover, all visual details of the exhibition, as well as its textual explanations, were thoroughly scrutinized by leading Holocaust historians to ensure their factual accuracy. To educate its visitors, the museum does not have to indoctrinate moral conclusions. They are inherent in the historical story which the museum relates.”
Author Michael Berenbaum states in the Introduction, “Here we seek to introduce you to the museum through the study of the Holocaust… This work does not seek to replicate the experience of the museum… Instead, the book is meant to stand… as an explanation of the Holocaust for those who seek to learn the history … independent of a visit to the museum… Within the … Museum… All of the Nazis’ victims are included and respected. At the center of the tragedy … is the murder of European Jews… historians have recognized … the victimization of the Gypsies… also homosexuals, political prisoners, Soviet POWs, and slave laborers… The museum… is an American institution, chartered by the Congress and built on federal land… Survivors speak of one commandment that …seared the souls of those who remained: Do not let the world forget.”
He recounts, “On the night of May 10, 1933, thousands of Nazi students, along with many professors, stormed universities, libraries, and bookstores …throughout Germany. They removed hundreds of thousands of books and cast them onto bonfires… The authors of some books were Jews, but most were not. Like many propaganda efforts, the book burnings were designed as a spectacle featuring torchlight parades, frenzied dancing, ritualistic chants, and massive bonfires… Jewish authors whose books were burned included Albert Einstein [and] Sigmund Freud… The works of Nobel Prize winner Thomas Mann, Germany’s best-known writer… were cast into the flames. Mann would soon leave Germany, one of more than two thousand writers and artists who could no longer regard Nazi Germany as home.” (Pg. 24)
He reports about the 1935 Nuremberg Laws, “German Jews were stripped of citizenship… For the first time in history, Jews were persecuted not for their religious beliefs and practices, but because of their so-called racial identity, irrevocably transmitted through the blood of their grandparents… The Nuremberg Laws were later imposed on lands occupied by the Nazis…” (Pg. 33)
He notes, “With the exception of a few pastors who resisted Nazi domination, the Protestant churches were also caught up in the zealous nationalism sweeping Germany… An opposition group, known as the Confessional Church, spoke out against the regime’s Nazi racial and anti-Christian teachings. It was led by the Reverend Martin Niemöller, the most prominent of hundreds of pastors … arrested beginning in 1936… He is reported to have said: ‘First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out---because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out---because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out---because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me---and there was no one left to speak for me.’” (Pg. 40-41)
He observes, “The United States, a nation of immigrants, was reluctant to become a haven for Jewish refugees. Reflexive nationalism went hand in hand with widespread antisemitism. The depression lingered on, and … new immigrants represented competition in the job market. That these were victims of Nazi persecution fleeing for their lives did not seem a sufficient reason to let in more than a trickle of refugees.” (Pg. 56)
He explains, “456 Danish Jews were sent to Theresienstadt [in Czechoslovakia]… the Danes … insisted that the Red Cross visit the ghetto… the Nazis permitted the visit. But they arranged an elaborate hoax… The ghetto was beautified. Gardens were planted, houses painted… the head of the Jewish Council of Elders greeted the guest in black suit and top hat. A band played light music… When the delegation came to the soccer field, a goal was scored on cue… A children’s opera… was performed for the guests. The hoax succeeded so well that a propaganda film showing how well the Jews were living under the benevolent protection of the Third Reich was made…When the filming was over, most of the cast, including nearly all of the children, were deported to Auschwitz.” (Pg. 88)
He recounts, “Historians disagree as to when the Holocaust began and whether the idea of murdering all the Jews took shape slowly over time or was rather a premeditated plan that existed at the very beginning of the Nazi regime. Did Hitler’s desire to rid Germany of the Jews, which he stated to clearly in ‘Mein Kampf,’ lead inexorably to his determination to kill all the Jews in Europe?... Until 1939, the basic aim of Nazi policy was the forced emigration of Jews. That policy failed when few countries were willing to offer the Jews a haven … The mass killing of Jews began immediately following the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941.” (Pg. 103) He continues, “The Holocaust served no political or territorial purpose… The Jews posed no territorial threat to the Nazis. Their murder yielded no geopolitical benefit… The killing of Jews was not the means to an end, but a fundamental goal in and of itself.” (Pg. 105)
He states, “The Final Solution was implemented in stages, although the various forms of killing overlapped as primitive methods gave way to what was considered state-of-the-art technology. Killing by bullets was followed by gassing in mobile killing vans, which were in turn supplanted by stationary gas chambers of much greater capacity.” (Pg. 122) Later, he adds, “There is no reliable evidence that human fat was used to manufacture soap, or that human skin was treated to make lamp shades, book bindings, purses, or similar objects in Auschwitz. But human bodies were used for experiments conducted by SS doctors.” (Pg. 151)
He points out, “In those areas of Eastern Europe that were covered by dense forests, Jews could flee to the forests … to form their own fighting units or join … mobile fighters who would stage fleeting attacks on the enemy. In Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, and Greece, Jews fought as equals alongside native partisans in a unified fighting movement. In the Soviet Union, Jews were welcome participants… Some partisan units consisted mainly of Jews.” (Pg. 177)
After the British liberated the Bergen-Belsen camp, “The British were horrified by what they found. Mass graves were dug, bulldozers were brought to shovel in the dead. Local civilians were marched into the camp…[and] were taken on a tour… the colonel in charge of medical efforts spoke to them: ‘… What you will see here is the final and utter condemnation of the Nazi Party. It justifies every measure the United Nations will take to exterminate that party… It is your lot to begin the hard task of restoring the name of the German people… But this cannot be done until you have reared a new generation amongst whom it is impossible to find people prepared to commit such crimes… [with] the instinctive good will to prevent a repetition of such horrible cruelties.’” (Pg. 186)
At the Nuremberg Trials, “The defendants did not deny they had done these things. A few professed ignorance, claiming they did not know what was happening…The most common defense was to deny responsibility: those in the dock had merely followed the orders of a superior. If anyone was responsible, it was those further up the chain of command. Judges and generals invoked the personal oath of allegiance they had sworn to Hitler…. They had given their word of honor to the Führer.” (Pg. 200)
He concludes, “The Holocaust cannot be reduced to order, or even to a sense of overriding meaning. The event defies meaning and negates hope. How, then, are we to approach it? Our first task is comprehension, understanding what at first seems incomprehensible… Our second task is to deal with the Holocaust and the absence of meaning: to confront the fact that mass murder was a self-justifying goal of state policy… We tend to back away from the real story, to shield ourselves from the darkness as a way to preserve our self-esteem as human beings, to fortify our confidence in humanity itself… Our third task is to live in the aftermath of the Holocaust: to live authentically, creatively, meaningfully… The Holocaust… shatters … religious faith in God and secular faith in human goodness and progress…. The Holocaust cannot be allowed to numb us to evil, but it must sensitize us and alarm us. It must sharpen our insights into the importance of human rights and human dignity everywhere.” (Pg. 220-222)
This well-illustrated book will be ‘must reading’ for anyone studying the Holocaust.