Roman art and architecture

by Mortimer Wheeler

In this wide-ranging analysis of Roman art, Sir Mortimer Wheeler describes the architecture & town planning, the sculpture & painting, the silverware, glass, pottery & other successful artistic achievements of the era.PrefaceThe Roman contributionGreece & the beginningItalyAfrica Near EastGaul Britain templesBath-buildings Forum & basilica Theatres, amphitheatres & circuses Houses Palaces Arches & engineering Aspects of sculpture & portraitureNarrative Landscape Other aspects of Roman the Romans as collectors & connoisseurs Roman art on the Celtic fringeRoman art in the EastNotesShort BibliographyList of IllustrationsIndex

Genres: Art, Architecture, History, Nonfiction, Art History, Roman, Italy

Paperback

First published December 1, 1964

Reviews

[Leslie · Rating 4 out of 5]

Dated but still useful and readable overview of Roman art and architecture. He makes some assumptions that art historians and classicists now would not make (I hope!), such as seeing the absence of full perspective in art as a failure on the part of Roman artists and craftspeople or the tendency to see the influence of eastern art and aesthetics on Roman work as a kind of decline or corruption rather than a useful or enriching hybridization. But it's probably unfair to blame a scholar of his period and training for making assumptions that would have struck few at the time as objectionable.

[Anne · Rating 5 out of 5]

How delightfully overwritten. "Almost riotously ornate."

[Georgina Farrelly · Rating 5 out of 5]

I love the way Wheeler, 20th century British archaeologist, makes the ancient art & architecture animate -
“The sacred and the secular meet in dusty juxtaposition”
“Quiet demarcation of civic pride”
“An architecture of utility and quiet dignity”

This is the closest thing we had to a textbook in Classics and I cherished it. no less for being very hard to get your paws on a copy.

[Susan K. · Rating 4 out of 5]

A phenomenal analysis to differentiate Roman art from the preceding Greek. As the Roman empire extended to the east, including India and China, and to the north, many other influences became evident that can be traced both through architecture and pottery.

[Linus · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good if a bit dry: recommended to anyone seriously interested in Roman history, both Republican and Imperial.

[Kate · Rating 4 out of 5]

Richly illustrated, but sadly rather fragmentary.

[Calum Orr · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good breadth of Roman Architecture to further pique my interest. I may look towards domestic Architecture next.

[Logan · Rating 3 out of 5]

Overwritten with some dated claims, but overall a good, brief overview of the major movements and materials of Roman art. Has a good focus on contact between “Rome-proper” and the fringes of the empire in the east and with the Celts in the North.

[Oscar Despard · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book constitutes a summary, pleasant introduction to its subject, written not to overawe readers ignorant of its topics but equally not to speak down to them.

The book occasionally wants for a more systematic approach, It is reasonable to desire, for instance, having been told of certain exemplars of the second and fourth Pompeian style, that the first and third might at least be mentioned, but that is not so. More seriously, after saying that the interior of the Pantheon is “one of man’s rare masterpieces”, Wheeler could reasonably be expected to describe it in some detail; instead, he passes on to bath-buildings with an abruptness that is as “thoroughly uncomfortable” as the disharmony between portico and rotunda in that famous temple.

Nevertheless, such breeziness contributes to the conversation style of the book; after reading it, one could easily imagine having Wheeler as an erudite and entertaining dinner guest. His thesis that Rome’s aesthetic achievements deserve respect as being different in kind, not inferior in degree, to those more renowned from Greece is convincingly put while never dominating the factual basis of the book. Overall, it is an excellent read.

[David · Rating 3 out of 5]

Good resource material.

[Joanie · Rating 4 out of 5]

For those that love this time period (and I do), this book is a must read.

[keereads · Rating 5 out of 5]

Read

[Susan Molloy · Rating 5 out of 5]

Required reading for one of my ancient art classes in college.

Review: Useful resource for study. I enjoyed this.