I might have liked this much better if I hadn’t loved Architecture of happiness so fully – this was published in 1999 and seemed impossibly dated, for one. Also the author was too fond of “we” – “we live our lives in X Y Z mode …” Well, you and your tapeworm, or who? And too many clichés. An excellent idea with some fine prose and worthwhile insights here and there – 33: “Isn’t there an enormous difference between something that is never used and something that is useless? And if something, like a front door, serves a basic human need for symbolic meanings, isn’t that also serving a function?” but no Alain de Botton. Ended strongly: 155-159, about living rooms and other social spaces inside the generally private space of home: “Even with TVs, VCRs, and CD players to entertain us at home, sitting around and talking remains a social activity humans have a natural aptitude for. That gathering space, whatever name it goes by, remains a place that is furnished as much by language as it is by any accommodating arrangement of furniture … (I)t is through conversation and human exchange that known boundaries can be transcended, and in ordinary talk that the unlikely so often transpires.” And in the epilog, after an intriguing story of a representative of the power company who came to help them figure out why their energy use was suddenly off the charts, and did so by walking around listening for a hum that shouldn’t be there: 163 Busch rejects the idea that houses have “personalities” but they do have “a language of (their) own … a network of social and cultural currents, those habits, beliefs and values that also make it function … (I)t is by being attuned to all these systems that we might arrive at some genuine understanding of what is it that gives power to the places we live.” Worth reading for those insights alone, excellent places to start understanding the culture of the built environment.