Richard R. Brettell's innovative and beautifully-illustrated account explores the works of artists such as Monet, Gauguin, Picasso, and Dali--as well as lesser-known figures--in relation to expansion, colonialism, nationalism and internationalism, and the rise of the museum. Beginning with The Great Exhibition of 1851 in London, Brettell follows the development of the major European avant-garde the Realists, Impressionists, Post-Impressionists, Symbolists, Cubists, and Surrealists. Giving attention to the changing social, economic, and political climate, the book focuses on conditions for the development of modern art such as urban capitalism, modernity, and the accessible image made possible by art museums, temporary exhibitions, lithography, and photography. Brettell examines artists' responses to modernism, including changes in representation, vision, and "the art of seeing." Combining the most recent scholarship with 140 illustrations--75 in full color--the book chronicles the change in art and image itself, from the iconology of new representations of the nude human form to the anti-iconography of "art without 'subject'": landscape painting, text and image, and abstraction.
Tracing common themes of representation, imagination, perception, and sexuality across works in a wide range of different media, and offering profuse illustration to bring the changing art forms vividly to life, Modern Art 1851-1929 presents a fresh approach to the fine art and photography of this remarkable era.
I was so excited to read this but I've realised now that the Oxford History of Art series is written for people who already know about art. This is not me. I don't feel like I learnt anything at all from this book because its writing was too highbrow and most of the time the author just dropped in names and references instead of talking about any one thing in depth.
A very wide ranging art survey and critical assessment of art historiography itself, albeit centered on the seminal importance of Paris/France. The connections with capitalism are more asserted than proved, however. It frequently is a bit too hectoring about what historians haven’t done (a quantitative analysis of portrait commissions, for instance, which sounds like a good idea so long as someone else does it). Also: it’s interesting how in the last decade art history has shifted from the kind of study advocated here - the implication and embedding of the work of art in social practice - for a contemplative study of the work that frequently doesnt get out of the historian’s head. For instance, the shift in TJ Clark from his Manet’s Modernism to his recent Heaven on Earth.
As a dip into art history as an academic subject, it's interesting. And I did learn about artists I hadn't previously heard of or appreciated. But overall it's not clear who this book is for. It's essentially a series of essays talking about the development of art in its social context at a bizarrely high level. I did appreciate the prints though!