What do you think?
Rate this book
Defending the Realm: MI5 and the Shayler Affair by Mark Hollingsworth (12-Oct-1999) Hardcover
Updated and expanded with brand new material on the War on Terrorism, including insider reports on the Bali bombing, discussion of M15's tragic lack of intelligence on September 11th, and how it is now regarded as a massive intelligence failure. Defending the Realm provides a rare insight into the secret world of M15 and breaks new ground in revealing its covert techniques—from phone-tapping and mail tampering to the running of agents and surveillance operations. This new edition also provides a profile of M15's new female director, Hon. Eliza Manningham-Buller.
Unknown Binding
First published October 12, 1999
3 people are currently reading
52 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
May 18, 2023
This is just another one of the many books I’ve read on the security services / spies / intelligence agencies in general. I guess I have a morbid fascination. Non-fiction throws up some pretty weird stuff – Life itself is a lot stranger than fiction. This tale from a turncoat ex MI5 employee David Shayler, comes from a time of great change in the world, Security Services in general and it interests me in particular as I was living down in London at that specific time and had what I believe to be my own brush with Shayler’s employers. It was at a time (in history) when people still bought and read daily newspapers and not just get all their news information off Donald Trump’s twitter feed. I can distinctly remember all the controversial headlines about the whole affair.
The book is written by some Daily Mail journalists, a sort of hive for some of the smelliest sort of flies that the tabloid journalist industry attracts so automatically I was on my guard as to the agenda and the sort of bias, provocation, and fascist ideology of the book. Also, let’s get one thing straight. David Shayler is not a hero like they might try to portray him as, he’s not even an anti-hero. He’s just a sort of bo standard below-average MI5 officer, a disgruntled employee, a whistleblower. He knows what he’s signed up to by applying for the job in the first place, by successfully passing the vetting and by being offered a position. I think the Official Secrets Act as much as anyone may find it repulsive and disagree with it is pretty clear and explicit in what it states. Basically Shayler is a criminal and this book is evidence of his crime. He’s broken the Official Secrets Act, he’s also clearly committed treason and although he perhaps lacks the glamour of those that have gone before him such a Kim Philby, he’s certainly nothing more than traitor scum acting against the interests of this country which is exactly what MI5 or their employees are not supposed to be doing. Mi5 is their to protect the nation and yes, the job is difficult but I think the outset that Shayler has failed totally to appreciate the patriotic element of the work. It may have changed since the cold War and be [perhaps a little more boring, but it will adapt like many other industries and indeed since the time of publication MI5 has adapted, facing a new enemy is Islamic terror and the end of the Cold War has proven only really to be a brief ceasefire as the Russians are now back on the scene added to which a growing threat from China makes MI5 an even more critiical organization in the contemporary (and future) world.
I hold the whole message that Shayler and the writers are trying to present as completely invalid and very easy to discount. Zero sympathy for him. Nobody should be reading his revelations. Yes maybe a private letter to the MI5 boss would have been OK. But selling your story to the Daily Mail and anyone else with a chequebook? At least Kim Philby was sort of driven by ideology and is therefore it’s much more easy to identify with him. Shayler just basically wanted a nice comfy hug payout so he didn’t have to worry about his mortgage. Selfish capitalist. Thatcherist, blinkered self-aggrandisement and totally free of ethics and morality. About as close as we get to James Bond his little escape to France where his greed catches up with him and he eventually gets raided and arrested by the French authorities He was probably given a nice comfie bed and a constant supply of fresh croissants out there, just in case and It wasn’t corruption or anything like injustice. He was a serious wanted criminal and that is what INTERPOL etc is set up to sort out. Cheered me up when he finally got to Belmarsh. I’m tempted to look up his wiki but to see where he is now but it will just annoy me further.
He's an anonymous dot in a big blob and the secrecy of the work, yes it’s underpaid, difficult and the whole system and organization is frankly sh*t but so is everything else in #brokenbritain and has been for a long time. It’s reality. You don’t get to cut corners in life. Just a buy a lottery ticket like anyone else – I’m glad the sort of celebrity tabloid culture has removed a lot of power from the redtops with their lottery payout bribes to corrupt people and deliver huge sales. The British Press is by far the biggest threat to National Security we have. Greed and capitalism has turned them into the most sinister devious body of enemies ever produced on this island. They will stop at nothing to subvert Britain, the Commonwealth or the Empire. Just examining a tiny of fraction of Prince Harry’s valiant quest against them seeking justice is total proof of their treachery. Shame Murdoch didn’t holiday with Maxwell and the rest really as Davy Jones’ locker seems the best place for them all.
Well, looking directly at the book, Shayler claims MI5 cocked up IRA city of London attacks, He claims through word-of-mouth secondary information about an assassination plot by the British government on Colonel Gaddafi – Yes, well, Mr Shayler, Gadaffi (now dead of course), may have certain human rights etc but after Lockerbie he’s pretty much clear as an enemy of the British people and State. That’s who MI5 and MI6 and GCHQ are supposed to be targeting really. I was gutted that you didn’t take the offer by the Libyan intelligence service to clear off to Tripoli, would have made a much more exciting tale, one way or the other.
It's no recruitment manual for MI5, further justification that the actual job is absolutely nothing at all like a James Bond film. The appendix 2 of Shayler’s recommendations for organizational change, probably the most boring tract of text I’ve ever read, but is great in clarifying just what a hideous corporate body of bureaucratic bungling the MI5 security service is. I can see why MI5 officers can be so deadly effective and dangerous if they are spending 23 and half hours chained up to a desk under a pile of paperwork and government forms then I guess that for the half hour allocated break where they get to do the glamorous work in high speed car chases, staking the State’s budget on roulette spins and copping off with foreign birds etc, they are going to be so angry and wound up and pissed off that they’ll pretty much take out all their frustrations on any target and cause serious destructive damage.
Some of the revelations were significant like how much financial wastage there is. An example is the £25 million spent on an amateur computer system that didn’t work and that they had to go out and buy an off the shelf version of Microsoft Windows 95 to sort out the IT in this critical department of National Security shows clearly that mismanagement is very possible and real.
I think that it does clarify the need for change and that there are serious inadequacies and probably worse than a standard government civil service department I think that we could maybe look to other countries and the way they handle their intelligence services. The CIA and Mossad, for example, are vastly different. In many ways they have more liberty and power and more open and more effective. Our secrecy laws are a bit archaic. There is most certainly a lack of balances and checks in place for our intelligence services that would limit abuses, enable necessary change and improve efficiency and productivity and better achieve the desired goal of national security. I think that for this country James Bond is quite a double-edged sword. Whereas on the one hand it is a very positive and successful (fictional) brand, I would argue it is the very epitome of global espionage propaganda achievement, par excellence. Equally it is quite old now and it must entangle the intelligence services in manacles really and be very frustrating. Deception works to a point but needs to be balanced a bit with reality, openness and honesty.
I think looking back that even though it was pretty damned boring, that Dame Stella Rimington, as head of MI5 who released a boo, that this book was actually a watershed moment and an historic change in methodology for MI5. Yes, Ok we end up with the sort of Shayler trash a s a result. But is signals that change is happening.
I feel like a nosey idiot myself for contributing to the obvious treason of Shayler et all by purchasing the book. But it is an interesting read and I think might, if used properly, be useful to enact change. It must be a very popular text out in the Kremlin in Moscow or Pyongyang or Beijing or the Afghan Cave complex. It demonstrates weakness to our enemies, possible exploits and perhaps encourages hostile attacks on out nation. But it’s subject an idiot who I highly doubt had much access at all to any form of high-level security information. Vetting system is broken obviously. What to do about it aside from the recommended changes – well, really push the death penalty for treason to properly discourage future Shaylers – Hanging, drawing and quartering must have a value aside from public entertainment. I discount most of the so-called scandal and I’m pretty confident that although there have been mishaps and errors that MI5 in fact do actually run an effective security service with regard to domestic issues. The lack of serious security incidents on British soil is testament to their work being efficient.
The book is written by some Daily Mail journalists, a sort of hive for some of the smelliest sort of flies that the tabloid journalist industry attracts so automatically I was on my guard as to the agenda and the sort of bias, provocation, and fascist ideology of the book. Also, let’s get one thing straight. David Shayler is not a hero like they might try to portray him as, he’s not even an anti-hero. He’s just a sort of bo standard below-average MI5 officer, a disgruntled employee, a whistleblower. He knows what he’s signed up to by applying for the job in the first place, by successfully passing the vetting and by being offered a position. I think the Official Secrets Act as much as anyone may find it repulsive and disagree with it is pretty clear and explicit in what it states. Basically Shayler is a criminal and this book is evidence of his crime. He’s broken the Official Secrets Act, he’s also clearly committed treason and although he perhaps lacks the glamour of those that have gone before him such a Kim Philby, he’s certainly nothing more than traitor scum acting against the interests of this country which is exactly what MI5 or their employees are not supposed to be doing. Mi5 is their to protect the nation and yes, the job is difficult but I think the outset that Shayler has failed totally to appreciate the patriotic element of the work. It may have changed since the cold War and be [perhaps a little more boring, but it will adapt like many other industries and indeed since the time of publication MI5 has adapted, facing a new enemy is Islamic terror and the end of the Cold War has proven only really to be a brief ceasefire as the Russians are now back on the scene added to which a growing threat from China makes MI5 an even more critiical organization in the contemporary (and future) world.
I hold the whole message that Shayler and the writers are trying to present as completely invalid and very easy to discount. Zero sympathy for him. Nobody should be reading his revelations. Yes maybe a private letter to the MI5 boss would have been OK. But selling your story to the Daily Mail and anyone else with a chequebook? At least Kim Philby was sort of driven by ideology and is therefore it’s much more easy to identify with him. Shayler just basically wanted a nice comfy hug payout so he didn’t have to worry about his mortgage. Selfish capitalist. Thatcherist, blinkered self-aggrandisement and totally free of ethics and morality. About as close as we get to James Bond his little escape to France where his greed catches up with him and he eventually gets raided and arrested by the French authorities He was probably given a nice comfie bed and a constant supply of fresh croissants out there, just in case and It wasn’t corruption or anything like injustice. He was a serious wanted criminal and that is what INTERPOL etc is set up to sort out. Cheered me up when he finally got to Belmarsh. I’m tempted to look up his wiki but to see where he is now but it will just annoy me further.
He's an anonymous dot in a big blob and the secrecy of the work, yes it’s underpaid, difficult and the whole system and organization is frankly sh*t but so is everything else in #brokenbritain and has been for a long time. It’s reality. You don’t get to cut corners in life. Just a buy a lottery ticket like anyone else – I’m glad the sort of celebrity tabloid culture has removed a lot of power from the redtops with their lottery payout bribes to corrupt people and deliver huge sales. The British Press is by far the biggest threat to National Security we have. Greed and capitalism has turned them into the most sinister devious body of enemies ever produced on this island. They will stop at nothing to subvert Britain, the Commonwealth or the Empire. Just examining a tiny of fraction of Prince Harry’s valiant quest against them seeking justice is total proof of their treachery. Shame Murdoch didn’t holiday with Maxwell and the rest really as Davy Jones’ locker seems the best place for them all.
Well, looking directly at the book, Shayler claims MI5 cocked up IRA city of London attacks, He claims through word-of-mouth secondary information about an assassination plot by the British government on Colonel Gaddafi – Yes, well, Mr Shayler, Gadaffi (now dead of course), may have certain human rights etc but after Lockerbie he’s pretty much clear as an enemy of the British people and State. That’s who MI5 and MI6 and GCHQ are supposed to be targeting really. I was gutted that you didn’t take the offer by the Libyan intelligence service to clear off to Tripoli, would have made a much more exciting tale, one way or the other.
It's no recruitment manual for MI5, further justification that the actual job is absolutely nothing at all like a James Bond film. The appendix 2 of Shayler’s recommendations for organizational change, probably the most boring tract of text I’ve ever read, but is great in clarifying just what a hideous corporate body of bureaucratic bungling the MI5 security service is. I can see why MI5 officers can be so deadly effective and dangerous if they are spending 23 and half hours chained up to a desk under a pile of paperwork and government forms then I guess that for the half hour allocated break where they get to do the glamorous work in high speed car chases, staking the State’s budget on roulette spins and copping off with foreign birds etc, they are going to be so angry and wound up and pissed off that they’ll pretty much take out all their frustrations on any target and cause serious destructive damage.
Some of the revelations were significant like how much financial wastage there is. An example is the £25 million spent on an amateur computer system that didn’t work and that they had to go out and buy an off the shelf version of Microsoft Windows 95 to sort out the IT in this critical department of National Security shows clearly that mismanagement is very possible and real.
I think that it does clarify the need for change and that there are serious inadequacies and probably worse than a standard government civil service department I think that we could maybe look to other countries and the way they handle their intelligence services. The CIA and Mossad, for example, are vastly different. In many ways they have more liberty and power and more open and more effective. Our secrecy laws are a bit archaic. There is most certainly a lack of balances and checks in place for our intelligence services that would limit abuses, enable necessary change and improve efficiency and productivity and better achieve the desired goal of national security. I think that for this country James Bond is quite a double-edged sword. Whereas on the one hand it is a very positive and successful (fictional) brand, I would argue it is the very epitome of global espionage propaganda achievement, par excellence. Equally it is quite old now and it must entangle the intelligence services in manacles really and be very frustrating. Deception works to a point but needs to be balanced a bit with reality, openness and honesty.
I think looking back that even though it was pretty damned boring, that Dame Stella Rimington, as head of MI5 who released a boo, that this book was actually a watershed moment and an historic change in methodology for MI5. Yes, Ok we end up with the sort of Shayler trash a s a result. But is signals that change is happening.
I feel like a nosey idiot myself for contributing to the obvious treason of Shayler et all by purchasing the book. But it is an interesting read and I think might, if used properly, be useful to enact change. It must be a very popular text out in the Kremlin in Moscow or Pyongyang or Beijing or the Afghan Cave complex. It demonstrates weakness to our enemies, possible exploits and perhaps encourages hostile attacks on out nation. But it’s subject an idiot who I highly doubt had much access at all to any form of high-level security information. Vetting system is broken obviously. What to do about it aside from the recommended changes – well, really push the death penalty for treason to properly discourage future Shaylers – Hanging, drawing and quartering must have a value aside from public entertainment. I discount most of the so-called scandal and I’m pretty confident that although there have been mishaps and errors that MI5 in fact do actually run an effective security service with regard to domestic issues. The lack of serious security incidents on British soil is testament to their work being efficient.
May 13, 2021
After reading this, one has to wonder .....
..... one can reasonably suggest that the FBI is America’s equivalent of MI 5.
J. Edgar was Assistant Director of the Bureau of Investigation from 1921 to 24 and the Director of the FBI from 1924 until his sudden death [cardiac arrest] in 1972. A cunning chap, several presidents had a mind to remove the man from office, but later decided against it. I’m paraphrasing, I know, but J Edgar had himself a secret stash of files - ‘the skinny’ - on all those in power. He spent years compiling these personal files, with the use of illegal phone-taps, bugging, photography and some say, “the most devious means, honey-trapping even,” to get the dirt, so come the day he would be ‘bullet-proof’.
Now, one can wonder a little more .....
This juicy-morsel centres on the revelations made by David Shayler, a former MI 5 officer.
Why Shayler blew the whistle on this ‘most secret organisation’ and why the establishment hounded him is a story in itself; the detail of which you’ll find when reading this.
Anyone, at all interested in the intelligence community and life in the shadows would benefit from this.
I doubt there’s any fiction in this tale; and I’m satisfied the authors have shown, beyond reasonable doubt, that MI 5 should be turned inside-out and examined. The entire organisation should be sent to landfill and the few that do offer value absorbed into a completely new entity that works under continual scrutiny and close parliamentary oversight.
We learn that MI 5 have thousands upon thousands of files on those that ‘might’ be considered a ‘threat to national security’. These files are secret, and although one may make a lawful request to view the file, even those of the political class seem not to find success.
We learn of how MI 5 have spent millions of pounds on the surveillance of the political class (sometimes for decades) telephone taps, photography
and bugging - of homes, offices, hotel rooms, anywhere they please. What did they learn? Not much it would seem.
We learn that the opposition, Labour, made great claims of how MI 5 would be overhauled when they came to power. When they did, the great claims were somehow forgotten.
We learn that MI 5 are not shy of playing the honey-trap.
What did MI 5 learn about those that were destined to come to power? Enough, maybe, to apply a little pressure when it is needed.
One can but wonder ..... this is a must read.
..... one can reasonably suggest that the FBI is America’s equivalent of MI 5.
J. Edgar was Assistant Director of the Bureau of Investigation from 1921 to 24 and the Director of the FBI from 1924 until his sudden death [cardiac arrest] in 1972. A cunning chap, several presidents had a mind to remove the man from office, but later decided against it. I’m paraphrasing, I know, but J Edgar had himself a secret stash of files - ‘the skinny’ - on all those in power. He spent years compiling these personal files, with the use of illegal phone-taps, bugging, photography and some say, “the most devious means, honey-trapping even,” to get the dirt, so come the day he would be ‘bullet-proof’.
Now, one can wonder a little more .....
This juicy-morsel centres on the revelations made by David Shayler, a former MI 5 officer.
Why Shayler blew the whistle on this ‘most secret organisation’ and why the establishment hounded him is a story in itself; the detail of which you’ll find when reading this.
Anyone, at all interested in the intelligence community and life in the shadows would benefit from this.
I doubt there’s any fiction in this tale; and I’m satisfied the authors have shown, beyond reasonable doubt, that MI 5 should be turned inside-out and examined. The entire organisation should be sent to landfill and the few that do offer value absorbed into a completely new entity that works under continual scrutiny and close parliamentary oversight.
We learn that MI 5 have thousands upon thousands of files on those that ‘might’ be considered a ‘threat to national security’. These files are secret, and although one may make a lawful request to view the file, even those of the political class seem not to find success.
We learn of how MI 5 have spent millions of pounds on the surveillance of the political class (sometimes for decades) telephone taps, photography
and bugging - of homes, offices, hotel rooms, anywhere they please. What did they learn? Not much it would seem.
We learn that the opposition, Labour, made great claims of how MI 5 would be overhauled when they came to power. When they did, the great claims were somehow forgotten.
We learn that MI 5 are not shy of playing the honey-trap.
What did MI 5 learn about those that were destined to come to power? Enough, maybe, to apply a little pressure when it is needed.
One can but wonder ..... this is a must read.
July 8, 2023
Wrongly Titled. This is virtually nothing about MI5 but just about Shayler. I've had this book shelved for some time and now wish I'd never bought it. Most of the "research" must have come from Shayler or his girlfriend Annie Machon at the time. There is a similarity with Spies, Lies and Whistleblowers in writing style which says to me most of it was her words. There's an emphasis on sympathy for Shalyer who is mentioned in every chapter. He knew what he was doing when he divulged detail and knew it would be against the law otherwise he wouldn't have fled the country...if you don't want a parking ticket don't park on double yellow lines! Judging on what Shayler has done since this i can see why the authorities acted how they did.
There are also countless adjectives to sway the reader into some sort of dislike for the authorities when these two were arrested, e.g. they were "large" policemen etc. There isnt a good word about MI5 throughout, just critical observations. The chapters on their arrest were painful to read and very snowflake. It gives a minute by minute analysis of everything that happened. Totally unnecessary, just pads this bad book out.
The end seemed to me that like most of us who can see ways of improving a workplace don't go running to the press about it. Further, the writers seem to be OK with him divulging a "plan" to kill Gadaffi. IF this was true then did any of them think of the consequences that could have had to national security considering the regime of Libya at the time. As usual, journalists wanting to tell the "truth" never think of the implications. In this case this could have caused terrorist repercussions and indeed have killed people of this country.
There are also countless adjectives to sway the reader into some sort of dislike for the authorities when these two were arrested, e.g. they were "large" policemen etc. There isnt a good word about MI5 throughout, just critical observations. The chapters on their arrest were painful to read and very snowflake. It gives a minute by minute analysis of everything that happened. Totally unnecessary, just pads this bad book out.
The end seemed to me that like most of us who can see ways of improving a workplace don't go running to the press about it. Further, the writers seem to be OK with him divulging a "plan" to kill Gadaffi. IF this was true then did any of them think of the consequences that could have had to national security considering the regime of Libya at the time. As usual, journalists wanting to tell the "truth" never think of the implications. In this case this could have caused terrorist repercussions and indeed have killed people of this country.
March 6, 2022
Defending the Realm: Inside MI5 and the War on Terrorism:
This book describes what goes on within the inner-sanctum of MI 5.
We it is suggested by the flow from the mainstream media must accept that the organisation is under-funded, under-staffed and over-worked. The Defence of the Realm: The Authorised History of MI5, by Christopher Andrew, which I read too many years back, if my memory serves, does support that belief. This book and Mr Andrew's take on 'the service' are worth reading back-to-back, as such I shall now read 'The Defence of the Realm' once more.
There are better reviews than I could ever provide on Goodreads, John Sterling's is good place to start; and I shall not try and beat that. I'm still too shocked by the revelations found on these pages.
When 'Dodgy Dave' first took over at Number 10, he said "We should tighten our belts. As with family finances, we must look at what we have to spend and spend it wisely." I doubt MI 5 know much about 'tightening one's belt'. A good rule in all family finance is: don't throw what little you do have at frivolous, meaningless, wasteful antics.
I would suggest that those who hold the keys to the coffers are only too aware of how MI5 spend their resources digging the dirt on those in office and probably thought, "We'll give the service as little as we have to."
Year after year, tax payers money is wasted. These people may well squeal, "What we do is TOP SECRET," but, without doubt MI 5 should be put under close and continued independent oversight.
This book describes what goes on within the inner-sanctum of MI 5.
We it is suggested by the flow from the mainstream media must accept that the organisation is under-funded, under-staffed and over-worked. The Defence of the Realm: The Authorised History of MI5, by Christopher Andrew, which I read too many years back, if my memory serves, does support that belief. This book and Mr Andrew's take on 'the service' are worth reading back-to-back, as such I shall now read 'The Defence of the Realm' once more.
There are better reviews than I could ever provide on Goodreads, John Sterling's is good place to start; and I shall not try and beat that. I'm still too shocked by the revelations found on these pages.
When 'Dodgy Dave' first took over at Number 10, he said "We should tighten our belts. As with family finances, we must look at what we have to spend and spend it wisely." I doubt MI 5 know much about 'tightening one's belt'. A good rule in all family finance is: don't throw what little you do have at frivolous, meaningless, wasteful antics.
I would suggest that those who hold the keys to the coffers are only too aware of how MI5 spend their resources digging the dirt on those in office and probably thought, "We'll give the service as little as we have to."
Year after year, tax payers money is wasted. These people may well squeal, "What we do is TOP SECRET," but, without doubt MI 5 should be put under close and continued independent oversight.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews