This is not what I expected, which is not the author's fault. This is primarily a summary of scholarly theory about how adults learn. It's more concerned with condensing academic articles about how the brain retains information, than in providing educators with practical help in actually teaching.
As a summary of academic research, it covers an admirable amount of territory.
It was a textbook for one of my summer courses, so what can I say? It is a very good book for the course. I learned a great deal, but was it fun? Not exactly!!!!
The sheer NUMBER of times I have typed "Merriam et al. (2007)" this semester. Holy smokes. Also, Merriam et al. say academia's allll screwed up; go touch grass and tear down the patriarchy. Who am I to ignore them?
Pros Truly comprehensive overview. I am here, standing and clapping my hands together for the authors. Really, truly, genuinely, this book is a fantastic example of what it means to compile resources of a discipline together into a comprehensive text. Did it favor some theories over others on author preference alon? Sure, but I'm not faulting the authors for that. They provided sufficient defense for why some theories got more attention than others. Just truly amazing work, awesome reference list. Round of applause for these authors and the work they put into this.
PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS WITH BO CHANG (p. 50) AND JARVIS (p. 93). SHUT UPPPP THAT'S SO FRICKIN CUTE. ACADEMIA BUDDIES. I'd never seen this before!!!!! I AM IN L O V E WITH THE IDEA OF CREDIBLE AUTHORS IN THE FIELD EMAILING IDEAS BACK AND FORTH. THIS IS SO SO CUTE I CAN'T GET OVER IT. Do they sign off with hearts?? Do they have nicknames for each other?? Do they have inside jokes that we'll never get to see but that mean so much to them as individual humans, existing outside of their work???? I HAVE BEEN YELLING ABOUT THIS FOR M O N T H S NOW.
T H E O R I E S AND HOW! My GODS does this book cover a lot of ground. I learned so much. SO much. This may well be the most informative textbook I've ever had the privilege of reading. Truly demonstrates the defining taxonomic theories and groups of theories in andragogy and adult learning. There's so MUCH information!!!!!!
"F*ck capitalism and academia," say Merriam, Caffarella, and Baumgartner in 2007. I'm paraphrasing (unfortunately), but I bet if their editor had allowed them to say that, they would've. Anti-capitalism in academia 101 text. This was CRAZYYYYY. I've never read a text that was so carefully transparent. It was "f*ck academia" but written so as to be acceptable to [clearing throat and straightening bowtie] The Academy. FRIENDS, I AM R E A D I N G THIS FOR ACADEMIA. THE AUTHORS LIKELY K N E W THAT WAS THE CONTEXT IN WHICH THEIR BOOK WOULD BE READ. WHAT AN EXPERIENCE THIS BOOK WAS.
Cons I think I will always and forever be haunted by pages 9 and 15-16. Actual nightmares from those stats and their implications.
GIVE ME! MORE! DIAGRAMS! MOOOOREEEEE VISUALS!!! More visual breaks too!!! I'm wondering if the later editions included more visual breaks? Hopefully??? It was a bit overwhelming to try to convince myself to read allllllll those words and theories when there were no Visual Anchor Points other than the occasional subheading. Don't get me wrong, the subheadings were great, but the text would greatly benefit from More visual content.
For a long time, I’ve thought about the ability to learn as a master skill – the one that unlocks all the other possible skills. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide echoes that same sentiment. It acknowledges that, today, the world we live in requires greater degrees of learning than ever before and recognizes that much of the way we try to support and encourage learning isn’t best practice and doesn’t work.
Read this for my adult learning through the lifespan class in grad school.
The most insightful chapters were ones discussing adult learning theories, where adults learn, and and the impacts of tech changes and globalization on adult learning and education. Theories that resonated with me were McClusky’s Theory of Margin as well as Jarvis’ Learning Process
This will be a reference book for me to come back to.
This book does a great job summarizing a broad range of thoughts and theories of adult education. There is quite a bit of jargon that’s forced in to reflect the sentiment of the times, but if you can filter out some of that this is well worth your time to read. There’s a lot of different rabbit holes this will lead you down (in a good way)
mmmmmzzzmmmmmmmmmmmme_emmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm(^_^)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme_emmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm(~_~;)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmzzzmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme_emmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmキタ━━━(゜∀゜)━━━!!!!! done with this class this Friday, I sort of abandoned this book
This book is a great example of how modernism is ruining education. Every chapter is colored by a modernistic bias, and the end result is the attitude, "Why bother with adult education at all?" I gave it two stars just because of the descriptions of the various theories, though most of the theories are dismissed as not "modernist" enough by the authors.
It's a dense read and nonfiction is a slower pace for me. Lots of information on theories in adult education with relevancy to modern society and culture. I appreciated it more when I was able to apply it to the interviews and essays that I wrote for my graduate class at ECU.
It was okay, I found some chapters really interesting with really relatable knowledge and other chapters a little too crammed with information that it became too much. I had to read this for a class.
This was the textbook in a graduate level class. I found it hard to read and boring. It is filled with names of scholars and their contributions to adult learning theories.
Perhaps the "bible" for adult educators. I have returned to it numerous time and will continue to use it as timeless information necessary to understand and educate adult learners.