Perhaps my expectations were unrealistic. I have some experience with linear programming, and was hoping to leverage that knowledge to learn about economic analysis. That didn't happen.
Often "classics" are at least well written; it wasn't that either. The writing was scattered and repetitive:
-They spend a good deal of ink discussing linear models, and economic models, but none about whether either match the real world. This despite the lovely quote "... we can't blithely attribute properties of the real world to an abstract model."
-One example started by discussing sheet metal as an input for the production of automobiles, rambled for a couple of pages about marginal rates of substitution, then finished with a summary about thread as an input in textile production.
-They seem unable to decide whether they are writing a monograph or a textbook: 3 of 16 chapters have exercises.
-It was heavy on jargon - which would be fine if there were definitions. Their peculiar use of "efficiency" confused me until they defined it a hundred pages later. Several terms I couldn't find definitions for even in other sources and I believe to be out of date.
-and on, and on, ad nauseum.