Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Genesis

Rate this book
This volume, a part of the Old Testament Library series, explores the book of Genesis.

The Old Testament Library provides fresh and authoritative treatments of important aspects of Old Testament study through commentaries and general surveys. The contributors are scholars of international standing.

434 pages, Hardcover

Published January 1, 1973

28 people are currently reading
127 people want to read

About the author

Gerhard von Rad

99 books19 followers
Gerhard von Rad was Professor of Old Testament at the University of Heidelberg in Germany until his death in 1971. He is the author of several books, including Wisdom in Israel and Holy War in Ancient Israel.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
25 (40%)
4 stars
20 (32%)
3 stars
13 (20%)
2 stars
4 (6%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Profile Image for Greg.
649 reviews108 followers
February 9, 2017
This is an important commentary to engage when studying Genesis. It follows on Gunkel's important commentary. Both should be added to any scholar's library.
Profile Image for Timothy Decker.
334 reviews29 followers
December 5, 2022
Other than a few gold nuggets, mostly VR is taken up w source criticism.
Profile Image for Reinhardt.
276 reviews2 followers
February 14, 2026
A now dated commentary in the JEDP tradition.

Given its reputation, I had high expectations for this commentary. There may have been a day when this was the leading commentary on Genesis, but that day has long passed. Although it does have occasional flashes of insight, it is now superseded. The recent Anchor Bible commentary on Genesis by Ronald Handel, that also closely followed the JEDP sources, has superseded von Rad in nearly every way.

One can see how Child’s canonical approach was a reaction to the von Rad style commentaries. He constantly mangles the canonical text, and his primary source of insight is the sources. He can’t see any overall unity in the text. This, to me, is its fatal flaw.

Von Rad is a better theologian (see his excellent OT Theology) than commentator.

Useful now primarily for historical interest.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.