I'll start out with the positive: The goal of this book is about creating an environment that attracts and hosts the presence of God. (25) It's about bringing revival and keeping revival going. The author emphasizes connecting with Revivalists and studying what God is doing around the globe today in terms of revival. (143) It is a noble goal and desire. Something I wish more ministers across all denominations had. So, I can agree with the author on his intentions, but that's about it.
I would classify this book as being "lite reading," so lite that I think an appropriate description would be, "chaffy." There's not much substance to it. There's not much theological depth. I wouldn't classify it as heresy but definitely as, "junk food" doctrine. It has as much substance as a Cheeto puff.
What I didn't like -
I don't know what bothered me more about this book - the sloppy exegesis that was used to promote a very dangerous ecclesiastical hierarchy or the repeated moral flexing vibe that permeated the book. The vibe was, "Look at me! I do ministry right! Bethel does ministry right! Everyone else is wrong!"
The author has issues with historical forms of church government and hierarchical models. It's clear that he has a beef with teachers and pastors.
The author promotes a dangerous church leadership model that exalts apostles and prophets above the other gifts of pastor, evangelist and teacher to the Church.
In a nutshell, the author believes that apostles and prophets get revelation from heaven and are heavenly focused while pastors are concerned about people and teachers are concerned about being right -
"Paul clearly lays out an order of priority in this passage, and this order is related to the realms of the supernatural that correspond to each particular office. As you can see in the previous illustration, the anointing on the apostle and prophet creates a perspective that is primarily focused on perceiving what is going on in heaven and bringing that to earth. The teacher is focused on being able to describe everything that happened accurately, and the evangelist and pastor are focused on the people. Each of these areas of focus is very important, but in order for them to function together as God intended, they must relate to one another according to his order of priority. The areas of heavenly focus come first and influence the areas of earthly focus." -author quoting 1 Corinthians 12:27-28 (56)
"Rather than having the apostle and prophet at the foundation of the church culture, today the American church has largely placed the teacher, pastor, and or evangelist at the helm. But effectively divorcing the supernatural from ministry in this way has drastically impacted the general understanding of the true role of each anointing. Today in most churches the role of a teacher is to state clearly and accurately the truth of the Bible in a theologically sound message in an effort to build security into the lives of believers. The role of the pastor is to create a church that has strong family values and systems in place to nourish strong character and relationships. The role of the evangelist is to emphasize church growth and train truth members to share their faith and lead others to Christ.
"The problem is that these are earthly-focused models of leadership. Without the flow of grace from the apostles and prophets, who are not only focused on seeing what is going on in heaven but also releasing that reality here on earth, these models will inevitably lead us to focus on what we know God has done in the past and miss out on what He is doing now. They teach us to care more about knowledge than experience." (57)
"When Heaven is the model for our culture, the primary result is peace. Peace is the goal of Heaven because it is the primary quality of the government of God. But the disordered forms of government to which we've all become accustomed create not peace, but control, which is their intended goal. Man has the opposite goal of heaven. Earth's leadership structure is motivated by the desire to protect the rule of those in office. When we primarily structure the environment of God's house to protect the will of the people, we've stepped off the path of the 'wisdom from above.'"(60)
What then is the role of the teacher in the Church if it is not to prove that Christians are right to believe what they believe? In order for teachers to play their true role in the culture of the Church, they will first have to be willing to pursue a supernatural lifestyle. They will have to be dissatisfied with the armor of their arguments and the lifelessness of their theology. They will need to increase their courage to risk failure and live a life that is unable to answer all the questions of their world. The teachers must embrace mystery."(69) - the author presumes that teachers don't embrace mystery and they lack courage. He also assumes they are not pursuing a supernatural lifestyle, or at least, his idea of a supernatural lifestyle.
In chapter 3 the author seems to suggest that to have rules is to be unloving and part of the Old Covenant. Following this logic, God is unloving because of Sinai and the Ten Commandments.
"Generation after generation in the church has lived life attempting to protect a relationship to the rule book. You can say you're not all day long. What happens when somebody breaks the rules? That is your barometer. What happens when somebody violates what you're living to protect? That's where it's going to show up. That's your feedback right there. What happens when Johnny brings you an F on his report card? Your 'Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs' response is evidence of how important the rules are to you." (89) - so if you get upset when your child gets an F on his report card you're legalistic and rule-based?
"When we are afraid, we want control, and our responses to the sin of other people are a set of controls that help us feel like we are still in charge. The typical practices of the family, churches, and the government are to set a series of behaviors called punishments in front of an offender and require the offender to walk through these punishments in order to prove that the family, churches, and governments are still in charge in the environment. In doing so, we help to confirm the belief in the person who has chosen to sin that he or she is powerless to change and take responsibility for his or her behavior. This whole business is just what Jesus died to get rid of. He's introduced a whole other world with a whole other way." (92-93)
Author suggests that because God didn't punish David for sleeping with Bathsheba and killing her husband that it is wrong to get upset when people sin. (96)
Author states that Abigail was an unsubmissive wife because, "She did what her husband Nabel had refused to do - took her husband's stuff and gave it to David, who was very upset. He was coming to kill Nabel. She did an end run, and this made her a rebellious, unsubmissive wife according to the rules. And what was the response? God killed her jerk husband and she married David.⁵" But there's no record that Nabel had instructed Abigail to not interfere.
I found the author's perspective on punishment bizarre and extraodinarily speculative -
"Punishment's main purpose is to ease the anxiety of the people. We want to call it justice, but it is simply the fear of man in leaders who need to stay in favor with the people. As we saw in the lives of David and Peter, God's justice is baffling to human beings. We can only understand it when we give up trying to protect our relationship with the rules. When we start to protect a relationship with the law of life in Christ, our goal is never to assuage fear, but to restore a broken relationship and to get life and love flowing again, and there is only one process that will accomplish that. There is satisfaction through repentance. We have to lose our fear of sin and our fear of man, and we have to stop punishing those who repent." (114)
I could go on and on. Suffice it to say that I not only found this book and the fanciful ideas promoted within to be ludicrous but also dangerous. Dangerous because it promotes an ecclesiastical hierarchy that exalts leaders (apostles and prophets) above all else as closest to heaven. They are the one receiving heavenly revelation that others cannot and, therefore, they are basically above criticism.
This book is one of those that's good for starting a fire, not a revival fire but a fire to burn your trash. It's rubbish.