What do you think?
Rate this book
On Aristotle's Metaphysics: An Annotated Translation of the So-Called Epitome
This book contains the first English translation of an important medieval treatise on Aristotle's Metaphysics. The original Arabic text was composed around 1160 by the famous Andalusian philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd). The present translation has been prepared on the basis of a wide range of documents including, apart from the available Arabic editions, various medieval manuscripts as well as a Latin translation prepared in the Renaissance. It is accompanied by a commentary dealing with the major philosophical topics and philological problems of the text.
- GenresPhilosophyNonfiction
385 pages, Kindle Edition
First published December 1, 1986
4 people are currently reading
103 people want to read
About the author
ibn Rushd
205 books266 followersArabic version: ابن رشد
Commentaries of well known Arab philosopher, jurist, and physician Averroës or Averrhoës, also ibn Rushd, of Spain on Aristotle exerted a strong influence on medieval Christian theology.
Abu'l-Walid Ibn Rushd, better as Averroes, stands as a towering figure in the history of Islamic as that of west European thought. In the Islamic world, he played a decisive role in the defense of Greeks against the onslaughts of the Ash'arite (Mutakallimun), led by Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, and in the rehabilitation.
A common theme throughout his writings properly understood religion with no incompatibility. His contributions took many forms, ranging from his detailed, his defense against the attacks of those who condemned it as contrary to Islam and his construction of a form, cleansed as far as possible at the time of Neoplatonism.
After centuries of nearly total oblivion in west Europe, world recognition as early as the 13th century contributed to the rediscovery of the master. That instrumental discovery launched Scholasticism in Latin and the Renaissance of the 15th-century Europe in due course. Since the publication of [title:Averroes et l'averroisme] of Ernest Renan in 1852, notwithstanding very little attention to work of Averroes in English, French showed greater interest.
See more here.
Commentaries of well known Arab philosopher, jurist, and physician Averroës or Averrhoës, also ibn Rushd, of Spain on Aristotle exerted a strong influence on medieval Christian theology.
Abu'l-Walid Ibn Rushd, better as Averroes, stands as a towering figure in the history of Islamic as that of west European thought. In the Islamic world, he played a decisive role in the defense of Greeks against the onslaughts of the Ash'arite (Mutakallimun), led by Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, and in the rehabilitation.
A common theme throughout his writings properly understood religion with no incompatibility. His contributions took many forms, ranging from his detailed, his defense against the attacks of those who condemned it as contrary to Islam and his construction of a form, cleansed as far as possible at the time of Neoplatonism.
After centuries of nearly total oblivion in west Europe, world recognition as early as the 13th century contributed to the rediscovery of the master. That instrumental discovery launched Scholasticism in Latin and the Renaissance of the 15th-century Europe in due course. Since the publication of [title:Averroes et l'averroisme] of Ernest Renan in 1852, notwithstanding very little attention to work of Averroes in English, French showed greater interest.
See more here.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
May 8, 2022
This book is about to explain Aristotle's treaties of the "Metaphysics." Ibn Rushd had explained it in such a precise manner and elaborate the treaties to further understanding of Aristotle's concepts regarding God, Cause and Effect, Universe, heavenly bodies, worldly bodies, evolution, Substance and other eleven categories of Aristotle's philosophies.
Ibn Rushd indubitably had given their best to explain things according to their contemplation but in some spots within the book, it seems that his Islamic monotheism is infiltrated or perhaps he could inculcate it intentionally to make things derive according to his religion. It's human nature to be partial over many things or to want to understand things according to their perceptions which usually would happen with almost every writer and philosopher.
Besides that, I found that book so idealistic and imaginative, most of his arguments were based on the abstract level of discussion, regarding abstract beliefs and ideologies.
Ibn Rushd indubitably had given their best to explain things according to their contemplation but in some spots within the book, it seems that his Islamic monotheism is infiltrated or perhaps he could inculcate it intentionally to make things derive according to his religion. It's human nature to be partial over many things or to want to understand things according to their perceptions which usually would happen with almost every writer and philosopher.
Besides that, I found that book so idealistic and imaginative, most of his arguments were based on the abstract level of discussion, regarding abstract beliefs and ideologies.
Displaying 1 of 1 review