Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Science In The New Age: The Paranormal, Its Defenders and Debunkers

Rate this book
Explores ideologies of the paranormal in the USA, from views put forward by parapsychologists & crystal healers, to skeptics. Adopting a cultural perspective, Hess studies how each group constructs its own boundaries of true and false knowledge.

258 pages, Paperback

First published June 15, 1993

16 people want to read

About the author

David J. Hess

23 books4 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
1 (25%)
3 stars
2 (50%)
2 stars
1 (25%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Erik Graff.
5,171 reviews1,469 followers
March 8, 2015
David J. Hess apparently began his academic career with some interest in parapsychology and altered states of consciousness, but gained his advanced training in cultural anthropology. The result included early academic research about the culture(s) of Brazil, including the varieties of their religious and spiritist beliefs. This book represents a later career move into the area of the study of science and technology, but clearly his interest in the study of the paranormal endured.

Science in the New Age intends to be a constructive book, aiming towards some sort of meaningful dialog between persons and organizations in the New Age movements, in professional parapsychology and skeptics in the more established scientific disciplines. He begins it by discussing each group, their beliefs and self-definitions, emphasizing how self-definition involves the critique of Others to which each is contrasted or opposed.

The issue of definition is central and problematic. While, conveniently, Hess has organizations which he can refer to in terms of the parapsychologists (The Parapsychological Association) and the skeptics (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal), no such organization clearly represents the New Agers. Indeed, they are only vaguely defined throughout and the book might have been better were the argument confined to skeptics and parapsychologists.

If there's prejudice in this book, a matter forthrightly discussed by the author, it is sympathy for the parapsychologists, seen as a group in between the spiritualism of the New Age and the materialism of the skeptics. It is as regards them too that Hess provides some of his most constructive advice for future dialog.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.