This novel, though sometimes billed as being written by H.P. Lovecraft, is really instead almost entirely authored by August Derleth, working from notes and story fragments left by Lovecraft. It does have the feel of Lovecraft for the most part, though with maybe a little less of his sometimes purple prose and also included actual dialogue, something Lovecraft wasn’t known for, but did indeed include other Lovecraftian tropes, such as characters reading historical records of mysterious happenings, of people in the book perusing rare tomes of occult knowledge, of the reader being presented accounts left behind by people who met bad ends from Things Not Of This World, of encounters with strange townsfolk who while they appear poor, illiterate, and “degenerate” have vast knowledge again of Things Not Of This World, of much of the horror hinted at, coming from a rational, 20th century mind coming to terms with creatures that should be physically impossible, maybe only seeing this horror at the very end, of strange cults and rituals in the middle of the night among weird ruins, of the characters not believing what they saw, of the stakes being quite high if the protagonists fail to stop the Things Not Of This World entering ours, of not every main character surviving the narrative, of deeply alien creatures that just reek of evil so much that even things associated with them seem to put off a nearly tangible fog of sinister thoughts and intentions.
Indeed at times the book sort of read like a greatest hits of Lovecraft, or maybe more charitably an introduction to the Cthulhu mythos, with appearances (mostly mentions or brief discussions) of the Necronomicon, Miskatonic University, the Elder Sign, Cthulhu, the Elder Gods, the Great Old Ones, Yog-Sothoth, Nyarlathotep, Abdul Alhazred, Dunwich, Azathoth…all of that is there, often named dropped, sometimes figuring into the story to varying degrees. This book was published in 1945, and I wonder if this was in part a way to cement together the various stories of Lovecraft, of part of a way to establish what Cthulhu mythos canon would be, of setting this particular work in the context of the larger universe, and/or if it was just interesting backstory and use of at this point shared worldbuilding. It didn’t bother me until the very end, when it felt like list making by one of the characters. Not a huge problem I suppose, but I would have liked the overall story to be more tightly confined to one or maybe two of the Lovecraftian entities.
The novel’s structure was a division into three somewhat unequal parts. The first third was titled “Billington’s Wood” and presented in the third person the story of Ambrose Dewart, described later in the book as fifty-something years in age, “a pottering gentleman, a country squire lazily in search of something to occupy his time,” unfortunately that vocation being refurbishing an old, isolated home out in the wilds of Massachusetts. This home, a family home, he decides to refurbish in 1921, the home having been abandoned for nearly a century. This place also has a history of strange noises at night and even stranger disappearances, a home filled with an occult library and strange instructions about not molesting an odd and seemingly purposeless stone tower on the property or to disturb a marsh and its multitude of fireflies, frogs, and whippoorwills.
While examining the strange grounds and house he inherits, its odd library, and the local history, Dewart falls under the influence of some malevolent entities, though this isn’t explicit in this section of the novel. His reading and recounting of the previous owners and what they saw (as well as other locals) felt the most Lovecraftian part of the novel to me, with for a time the horror sort of between the lines as it were, in the events not talked about, perhaps recounted in missing journal references, of accounts of people avoiding the place but not quite saying why they were avoiding it. It was a slow build and probably wouldn’t do well with most modern readers I would think unless they were Lovecraft fans but I read through it fairly fast (though the 2005 novel _The Historian_ by Elizabeth Kostova certainly relied a lot on the use of historical research of books and especially correspondence).
The following middle third is titled the “Manuscript of Stephen Bates” and unlike the first third, is told from the first-person point of view. Bates is the cousin of Dewart, summoned from Boston by a frantic note from Dewart, who as Bates describes in the book was from “a man who sincerely asked and needed some assistance toward an explanation in which he found himself caught, however inexplicably,” though upon arrival at the house in Billington’s Wood Bates finds his cousin instead “cool, cautious, and very much self-contained,” no longer quite as needful of his assistance, but guardedly friendly to a point. This middle third of the novel covers Bates investigation on what appears to be at times a schizophrenic state of mind in his cousin (alternating between being frantic, friendly, hostile, guarded, or affable) as well as the numerous odd papers and books in the house, the strange structures in the ground, and increasingly the odd sights and sounds as well. Though it covered quite literally much of the same ground as the first third, it felt more immediate and fresher than one could expect, in part because it was in the first person and also because Bates felt a bit more identifiable, perhaps because while at some point in the first third Dewart fell under control to an extent from malevolent entities, Bates (sorry if this is a spoiler) kept his wits about him.
The final third was titled the “Narrative of Winfield Phillips,” another section presented in the first-person and had the most dialogue in the book. The title character, along with the other main character in this section, Dr. Seneca Lapham, a professor of anthropology at Miskatonic Universe, are individuals who Stephen Bates comes seeking advice and help from on the matter of his cousin Ambrose Dewart and the strange happenings in his home. Again, some recounting of past events that both Dewart and Bates uncovered (here is where I would have seriously edited the book) and the aforementioned list making/name dropping of the various elements of the Cthulhu Mythos, though this section did place the danger at Billington’s Wood in a larger context, provided information that Dewart and later Bates simply did not have, and most importantly had the resolution to both Dewart’s and Bates’ plot lines.
In general, I thought the book just ok. Despite it being a very, very slow build it still read fairly fast. I didn’t trip over as many words as I sometimes do with Lovecraft, it was nice to see the book avoid the veers into racism that Lovecraft very sadly made (I only recall one passage that I might call racist – “…this has been equally true of the American Indian as of the African Negro who had in many places set up the phonograph as an object of worship because it was completely beyond his comprehension” – although the people of Dunwich were sort of stereotyped they were in the book deeply odd people so I will give that one a pass), and there were some horror elements I liked (the aforementioned frogs, fireflies, and whippoorwills were effectively used to build tension, as was the Elder Sign). I don’t think the book really broke new ground in the mythos or introduced any notable new elements. It basically read to me like “half way decent story set in the world of the Cthulhu mythos.”