Dame Agatha Christie and Her Peers
BOOK 19
This 1965 publication has a certain 1965 flavor, relating to films of the time. Not a bad thing at all, given the relationship, but more on that shortly.
CAST – 3 stars: Daniel Roke is our hero, a “shining knight” even, as his parent’s had passed when he as young and he does a beautiful job (natch!) raising his siblings and sacrificing his own dreams of seeing the world. But he has done very well for himself and his family. I completely get Roke's itch to move on as I've had 15 permanent addresses since leaving undergraduate school. (And I thought I was ready to settle down, but no, I gotta check out other places. I've never lived outside of America and...oh, there I go again...back to the book.) He grabs for the golden ring when Lord October (savior? or not?) offers Daniel an opportunity requiring Roke to move from Australia to England. But Roke's younger brother, Phillip, and his two younger sisters Belinda and Helen also have dreams, and Roke needs much more money (and adventure) for them to get the right education, for him to LIVE life to the fullest.Early on, the author writes, “Common sense lost” concerning Roke's decision to leave his family. (This is all in the first chapter so I'm not giving anything away.) Friends and enemies abound in England. It’s a solid cast, almost 4-stars. But it’s a bit on the fantasy/hero/how did he survive that...or that...so suspend belief a bit. This author really knows how to tug at reader's hearts, and it's a bit too obvious.
PLOT/CRIME – 4: The crime is a fascinating one: horses that appear to be doped (after the race their behavior is erratic and unusual) are winning said races. But when the horses are tested, analysis shows nothing. Oh, what big red herrings are put forth by the author early. Daniel must penetrate deep into the evil-doers fortress, save the damsel in distress, and live to tell the story. Yes, again, there is a fantasy element, but still a very good story.
PLACE/ATMOSPHERE – 3: Compared to other detective series involving horse racing…wait, there isn’t another one, I don’t think. Anyway, I know nothing about horse racing and horse doping. I thought Francis did a great job with atmosphere in a previous novel, “Nerve.” But I was lost on occasion here. Yes, there is the Australian outback. But I wanted more of that. Yes, there is research into why horses are acting like they do, but I wanted to know more about how regular horses act after a win. Or a loss. The term “box” is used a few times and in different ways. And of course there is fabulous England and moors and castles in the air, but I wanted more of that also.
INVESTIGATION – 3: Daniel digs so deep: it just seems unendurable to me. This is more American style hard-boiled private eye, really, than English cozy: the violence is comparatively, well, violent. During Daniel's adventures, one of two of Lord October's daughters accuses Daniel of rape but it’s a flat out lie as we were there watching/reading the scene. October tosses Daniel to the villians. But what does Daniel do when the other daughter invites him to her dorm room? He goes! Alone! I couldn’t decide if Daniel was particularly naive, or that perhaps times have changed far more than it seems to me. He does other things that seem equally on the side of bad decision-making, and although I was willing to suspend some belief, I wasn't able to step out of reality completely. There are thrills and chills galore, though: you'll keep turning the pages.
SOLUTION – 4: It’s a doozy, alright. But it involves a very ugly subject matter (animal mistreatment, so beware). I liked very much the way everything wraps up: there is a great action sequence toward the end, then a very cool twist that the inner book flap alludes to, that I was looking for, but still it was unexpected and great fun.
SUMMARY: 3.4. I kept thinking, “This sorta feels like an Ian Fleming” spy thriller (I’ve read the first ten in that series). Given the publication date of 1965, I looked up the release year of “Goldfinger”: 1964. Yea, this is Bond/spy thriller/penetrating the fortress, getting the gal (well, maybe) then the final cool twist taking us deep into the world of...secret stuff I can’t talk about. I really liked it, it was fun, and even though Francis might very well be borrowing some Bond adventure (Daniel is hot, and kind, and daring), and we have a good Bond girl and a bad Bond girl, and foreign villains, "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery." And the title, “For Kicks” might be telling: Francis perhaps wrote this for kicks, just as the Bond craze had kicked in (and, I think, peaked at 'Goldfinger'). Substitute a farm training stable for Fort Knox, shake but don't stir (rather, think too hard), and enjoy! This would have made a far better Bond film than, say, "The Spy who Loved Me." Couldn't quite gives this one 4 stars because the motivations/actions of the cast were on the unbelievable/heart-tugging side.