What do you think?
Rate this book
Pagan Rome and the Early Christians
As perceived by the average Roman citizen, the early rites and behavior of Christians laid them open to charges of cannibalism, immorality, and the practice of magic and conspiring and fomenting rebellion aganst the state.
The early church fathers rejected these accusations and portrayed pagans as victims of misinformation or perpetrators of ill will. Benko proposes to give the pagans the benefit of the doubt and analyzes their charges against Christianity under the premise that they may have been right within the context of the times. He has provided a persuasively argued and refreshing―if controversial―perspective on the confrontation of the pagan and early Christian worlds.
The early church fathers rejected these accusations and portrayed pagans as victims of misinformation or perpetrators of ill will. Benko proposes to give the pagans the benefit of the doubt and analyzes their charges against Christianity under the premise that they may have been right within the context of the times. He has provided a persuasively argued and refreshing―if controversial―perspective on the confrontation of the pagan and early Christian worlds.
Paperback
First published December 12, 1985
47 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
April 24, 2022
Stephen Benko, in Pagan Rome and the Early Christians, took a unique, intriguing approach to writing the history of Christendom’s first three centuries. He asked the questions: how would the Roman culture have viewed this new faith within their own context. I admired his commitment to approaching the question that way.
Unfortunately, his execution was quite poor. Benko notes the common, well-documented views of early Christians: they were a secret sect, they had strange ceremonies, they were cannibals, they practiced sexual immorality in secret meetings. Benko explains, chapter-by-chapter, where a view like that would have come from in the society and time of the early church. So far, so good. But the author failed to measure those views against the evidence to ask if they were reasonable views, even within the context of the first century. He also failed to measure his selected evidence against the broad, and widely documented, counter evidence of a people who were reasonable, peaceful, loving, committed to each other and to their God—committed enough, in fact it undergo gruesome persecution and death.
Most illustrative of his poor methodology was a chapter entitled, “A Portrait of an Early Christian,” where Benko sketches the life of one Perigrineus Proteus who lived from 110-165. Proteus, suspected of killing his father for his inheritance, traveled to Palestine, found Christians, joined the church and became prominent within the early church there and eventually was imprisoned for his faith. In prison, his brother believers cared for his needs to an extent that some criticized him for enriching himself with their aid. Eventually, he was released and traveled around the churches, receiving aid because of his history of enduring persecution. “Something” turned the church against him and he was excommunicated from the body of early Christians, later becoming a cynic. Protheus later foretold his own death at the Olympic Games in 165. A year’s worth of speculation and gossip about his prophecy brought a large crowd to the games, and, not disappointing them, Protheus jumped into the flames and perished as he had foretold.
A reader would be justified, finishing the chapter, to wonder, “Why would the author spend so much time on this strange personality in a book about the early church?” The author himself admits, at the end of the chapter, “it would be far fetched to call Perigrineus a CHRISTIAN monastic.” (Emphasis the author’s.) Just so.
Some interesting details of early church history here, but not much else to recommend the book.
Unfortunately, his execution was quite poor. Benko notes the common, well-documented views of early Christians: they were a secret sect, they had strange ceremonies, they were cannibals, they practiced sexual immorality in secret meetings. Benko explains, chapter-by-chapter, where a view like that would have come from in the society and time of the early church. So far, so good. But the author failed to measure those views against the evidence to ask if they were reasonable views, even within the context of the first century. He also failed to measure his selected evidence against the broad, and widely documented, counter evidence of a people who were reasonable, peaceful, loving, committed to each other and to their God—committed enough, in fact it undergo gruesome persecution and death.
Most illustrative of his poor methodology was a chapter entitled, “A Portrait of an Early Christian,” where Benko sketches the life of one Perigrineus Proteus who lived from 110-165. Proteus, suspected of killing his father for his inheritance, traveled to Palestine, found Christians, joined the church and became prominent within the early church there and eventually was imprisoned for his faith. In prison, his brother believers cared for his needs to an extent that some criticized him for enriching himself with their aid. Eventually, he was released and traveled around the churches, receiving aid because of his history of enduring persecution. “Something” turned the church against him and he was excommunicated from the body of early Christians, later becoming a cynic. Protheus later foretold his own death at the Olympic Games in 165. A year’s worth of speculation and gossip about his prophecy brought a large crowd to the games, and, not disappointing them, Protheus jumped into the flames and perished as he had foretold.
A reader would be justified, finishing the chapter, to wonder, “Why would the author spend so much time on this strange personality in a book about the early church?” The author himself admits, at the end of the chapter, “it would be far fetched to call Perigrineus a CHRISTIAN monastic.” (Emphasis the author’s.) Just so.
Some interesting details of early church history here, but not much else to recommend the book.
February 11, 2017
While good, the style is more than a bit dry, and I found some of it to be a slog as a result. There were some fascinating bits of both Roman and Christian history, and a great explanation of why Romans thought that the Christian movement was both subversive and a bit insane.
Still, if you're interested in the early church and its interactions with Roman government and society, this is a good overview.
Still, if you're interested in the early church and its interactions with Roman government and society, this is a good overview.
August 14, 2011
This is a very interesting and engaging book. Roman persecution of the early Christians has been well documented and discussed in classics classrooms, but this book goes further and addresses the question: why did the Romans think the things they thought? It didn't come out of nowhere.
Chapters were short and easy to read, although unfortunately I lost my enthusiasm after the chapter "The Kiss." It was 20 pages discussing the role of kissing in early Christian theology and practice, and 2 paragraphs tying that back into the central theme of Roman reactions. I had a hard time getting back into it after that.
Chapters were short and easy to read, although unfortunately I lost my enthusiasm after the chapter "The Kiss." It was 20 pages discussing the role of kissing in early Christian theology and practice, and 2 paragraphs tying that back into the central theme of Roman reactions. I had a hard time getting back into it after that.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews