In the years immediately following Napoleon's defeat, French thinkers in all fields set their minds to the problem of how to recover from the long upheavals that had been set into motion by the French Revolution. Many challenged the Enlightenment's emphasis on mechanics and questioned the rising power of machines, seeking a return to the organic unity of an earlier age and triggering the artistic and philosophical movement of romanticism. Previous scholars have viewed romanticism and industrialization in opposition, but in this groundbreaking volume John Tresch reveals how thoroughly entwined science and the arts were in early nineteenth-century France and how they worked together to unite a fractured society. Focusing on a set of celebrated technologies, including steam engines, electromagnetic and geophysical instruments, early photography, and mass-scale printing, Tresch looks at how new conceptions of energy, instrumentality, and association fueled such diverse developments as fantastic literature, popular astronomy, grand opera, positivism, utopian socialism, and the Revolution of 1848. He shows that those who attempted to fuse organicism and mechanism in various ways, including Alexander von Humboldt and Auguste Comte, charted a road not taken that resonates today. Essential reading for historians of science, intellectual and cultural historians of Europe, and literary and art historians, The Romantic Machine is poised to profoundly alter our understanding of the scientific and cultural landscape of the early nineteenth century.
It throws a lot at you, but absolutely fascinating if you stick with it.
“This book examines a period in which a different image of science—as a theory of nature and a theory of knowing—appeared, at the same time as a new set of machines came on the scene: steam engines, batteries, sensitive electrical and atmospheric instruments, improved presses, and photography. These were “romantic machines.” Unlike “classical machines,” they were understood as flexible, active, and inextricably woven into circuits of both living and inanimate elements. These new devices accompanied a new understanding of nature, as growing, complexly interdependent, and modifiable, and of knowledge, as an active, transformative intervention in which human thoughts, feelings, and intentions—in short, human consciousness— played an inevitable role in establishing truth.
This alternative scientific tradition rose to prominence in the 1820s, 1830s, and 1840s amid the upheavals of early industrialization. I focus on its manifestations in Paris, the city to which many looked for signs of things to come. After 1850 the classical image of science again took the upper hand; even today, we largely take for granted that real knowledge is possible only where there is a radical divide between subjects and objects and where nature is reduced to discrete, predictable mechanisms. Yet this other view, which I call mechanical romanticism, made major contributions to physics, evolutionary theory, the social sciences, mass entertainment, modern transport and communications, and precipitated the Revolution of 1848. This book reconstructs this neglected theory of nature and knowledge, one that may be a resource for those who seek to redraft the relationships between machines, knowledge, and the earth.” (xi-xii)
a bit too fantastical for me.. and kinda difficult to get through such dense detail-heavy writing. but appreciate the new perspective on romanticism and STS in general, reoriented my too-strong belief in daston and galison lol
super enjoyable read that demonstrates the shift in the role of machines and technology in the decades after 1800. tresch beautifully dances through different scientists, philosophies, inventions, and political moments!
Another interesting read on romanticism. Also powerfully challenges the "mechanization of society" stereotype of modernity that fills popular culture and art.
beautiful book. wonderful account of vitalistic mechanics written in a popular style (though academic idiom) by an extremely intelligent historian/sociologist of science.