The Smallest Talk

by Michael McFee

Michael McFee, in his new book, The Smallest Talk , squeezes the conventions of poetry-- image, rhythm, language and meaning-- into the smallest possible package. These monostiches, as one-line poems are often called, are extraordinary feats of wit, as much kin to prose poems as to a comedian's smartest lines. If comedians zing, then McFee zings darkly, with the verbal charge and resonance of longer poems. The Smallest Talk is an examination of poetic line in its barest terms, a celebration of compactness. Yet, there is a hint of narrative across these one-line poems, the implication that even as a line stands alone, it consistently speaks to its surroundings. "William Matthews' chapbook, the long out-of-print An Old Oar in the Water , lit me up, because before I read it, I don't know that I'd ever even thought about one-line poems," says McFee. "The challenge became to take all of the virtues that you usually develop over ten, or thirty, or five hundred, lines and squeeze it down to the smallest possible talk that still has the evocativeness and the memorability that good poems have." "Then I started poking around on my own and reading other one-liners, monostiches as they are called, which have a very ancient tradition. Most of them felt not so much unfinished as unbegun-- they were like a line that needed to be surrounded by a dozen other lines. The trick became not to do that-- to have a self-sufficient verbal unit that's intriguing enough to want to read again and again and again."

Genres: Poetry

Paperback

Published March 6, 2007

Reviews

[Jeanette · Rating 3 out of 5]

I really like poetry, but this maybe wasn't quite enough for me to love.... I really loved a couple of these one-line poems, but quite a few I didn't like at all and the rest I felt ambivalent about..... I would still try more of Michael McFee's work in the future, I'm just not jumping for joy. :)

[Amanda · Rating 1 out of 5]

I was sometimes disgusted by these one line poems--they are too easy.

A few were good, though.