Brontë

by Polly Teale

The short troubled lives of the Bronte sisters have become one the great literary myths of all time. How was it possible that three women who had never had sex, had probably never been kissed, could write some of the most erotic literature of all time? And why should these plain, reclusive women, who lived in rural isolation, have invented such stories.

Genres: Plays, Fiction, Gothic, Drama, 21st Century

96 pages, Paperback

First published April 1, 2006

Reviews

[Parnian.K]

So beautiful, so poetic, so tender, and deeply contemporary. It truly touched my heart and brought me to tears more than once. One of the most stunning and poetic plays I’ve ever read; a gem discovered by coincidence while searching online for a monologue. I can only imagine how breathtaking it would be on stage. I’m going to hold it very dear to my heart and will definitely come back to it in the future.

[Zahra Sh]

درهمه‌ی زندگی‌ام آرزو كرده‌ام تحسين شوم، آرزو كرده‌ام براى موفقیتی چشمگير ستوده شوم. وبا اين حال هر چه بيشتر زيسته‌ام، بيشتر به اين نتيجه رسيده‌ام كه خوشبختى را نمى توان در ستايش‌ها و تمجيدهاى ديگران يافت. اكر خاص باشى، اگر استثنايى باشى، از ديگران جدا مى مانى، اصلاً شايد همين علت تنهايى ما باشد. رضايت در معمولى بودن مان است، در كامل نبودن مان و در جزئيات كوچک زندگی. دست كم اميدوارم كه اين طور باشد.

-از متن کتاب
-از زبان شارلوت برونته خالق اثر جین ایر

[Grace Turner]

I can't believe it has taken me so long to come across this masterpiece. Just sheer perfection. I am in awe. The play I wish I had written first.

[Negin]

عالی! عالی!

[emily]

It feels a little bit like a fan-fict., but it was executed quite well (wasn't Dante's Inferno a fan-fict. as well?). Only 3-stars because I felt like there were many parts in the play which Teale could've played more 'creatively' with. For instance - I felt like since it was already a work of fiction in itself - she didn't have to put in chunks of excerpts from the Brönte's original work (and instead did something more 'creative' with the text).

Also, I never liked Branwell even though I know that he's an essential character - so I'd expected Teale to portray him slightly differently than how everyone else did (like the film adaptations/whatnots) but she didn't really 'spice things up'/make him more interesting and/so he appeared 'boring' and very predictable to me when I was reading the play. It made me skim the page(s) a little because he's just the same old Branwell everyone's already made him up to be.

[Moira]

All you really need to know about this thing is that one actress is supposed to play Bertha/Cathy, one actor is Branwell/Arthur Huntingdon/Heathcliff, and another actor is Patrick/Arthur Bell Nicholls/Rochester/and "Mr" Heger.

That last job is a lot of versatility for even an actor, the poor bastard.


(Also the actresses are required to play the sisters as adults and as children. Never never a good idea, unless your name is Dennis Potter.)

[Kira]

To my taste—a rough start, with the actors talking to the audience before literally changing into the sisters onstage—what made me round down. Contemporary in style, though period in dialogue. Picked up about halfway through. Interesting casting of dual roles. Definitely good for academic theatre, but probably not community.

[Madeleine Rose Healey]

I don’t know which part I’d want to play more!

It’s full of some strange sexual moments and I’m not sure I like the part where the actor playing Charlotte’s father doubles up as Mr Rochester when she plays Jane Eyre … uncomfortable.

[Nat]

I mean it was great read don't get me wrong, but I didn't really get the point of it, except to show how the Brontës lived. So like good for an 80 page play or whatevs...

[themistyugly]

slow start - but i related to literally all of the brontë children LOL and there are some COLD lines in this play

[Paul Wilson]

Loved this. How did these sisters write such powerful and passionate stuff? Great play about how the events of their life influence their fiction.

Great quotes
‘Our lives may have been different. We would be gone. Lost. Sunk without a trace. In the deep dark river that claims us all’

‘He had been infected by that strange sickness, the belief that life has no meaning unless it is perceived by others and you are forever known’

‘We are all alone and never more so than when surrounded by strangers, trying to convince them we are not the hopeless failure we believe ourselves to be’

‘I do not believe you don’t want to be read. What are words if not the means God gave us to reach, to grope towards one another through the darkness in hope, in hope of being found. In hope that we might become visible, to ourselves and others. Become known’

‘I write to be unknown. To exist outside and beyond myself. To be in the is-ness of things as I was once before I knew’

‘He gave us not only the power to see but the knowledge that we could be seen and with it came the desire to hide, to show only what is admirable, what is enjviable in ourselves. To conceal that of which we are ashamed’

‘This need to be special and exceptional may be the very cause of one’s loneliness. It is our ordinariness, in our imperfection, in the details of life that contentment is found’

[Nicole]

I think I loved this. Some of the theatricality doesn't necessarily play well on the page, but the central through-line here of three sisters and their brother is just something I've never seen explored on stage before.

[Naomi]

Incredible

[Sophie]

Read after studying in drama. I enjoyed it a lot, though I think I missed some of the point of it.

[Kay]

This was OK - but I find it difficult to judge a play script without seeing the work on stage. Characters from Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights also appear on stage to illustrate aspects of the characters of Charlotte and Emily. The dilemma of wanting to have recognition for their literary work, whilst not wanting to step into the limelight themselves is very well explored.