A couple of years ago, I was looking for inspiration in the field of data visualisation and I bought a handful of books. Unfortunately, I picked up the other books first. It's clear now that I should have read this and Yau's sister (and earlier) book "Visualize This" first, as they provide a solid fundamental.
I read Data Points after Visualize This, which worked well, although you could in theory read them in parallel. Confusingly, Data Points deals more with visual aspects, and Visualize This deals more with data. I suppose they struggled to find as catchy and relevant a name for his follow-up publication.
Bearing in mind these are starter books (dealing with high-level, broad-brush points, while also diving into basic nuts-and-bolts aspects) I reckon both books deserve 4 stars based on their readability and structural clarity. I would have liked to have dug deeper and got funkier, but hey, that's for another book...
Negatives? Yau's writing style is poor. In the end, I had to picture him talking to me, to move through the text - it didn't work in my voice. Far too many grammatical errors, typos and such like. Data Points starts off better in this respect, but gets sloppy too. Failure to distinguish between singular and plural is common (and I'm not just talking about the word "data" here). Ironically, since he actually cites this in his own guidance as a point of concern, the second book suffers especially from a spatial disconnect between graphics and the text where they are referenced (sometimes 4 pages apart!). Understandable on an occasional basis, this gets tiresome when it becomes the norm. In some cases, full-page graphics are necessary, and often aesthetics point to greater space usage by visual components (some are really beautiful, some really complex), but you get the feeling that there was also an incentive to fill out the pages, this book being somewhat shorter than its predecessor (which filled many pages with lines of coding examples, and rightly so.)
In the end, Yau writes in a very homey, personal way, which is quite engaging and is a relief from the designer arrogance/fluffiness or data/stats over-technicality which you might fear from a book in this field.