I hesitate to this book a bad review because it's not as though I didn't learn something from it. One of the positive effects of the book was that it inspired me to read more of Hannah Arendt's own work, and at least initially the book provided something like a framework in which to begin to think about some of her Big Ideas. That said, what was most disconcerting about the work was the way in which her ideas were consistently pitted up against contemporary Continental Philosophers' ideas. It would have been great if I thought these contemporary thinkers had something to say, but I never found it to be an interesting artificial conversation between what she thought and what they thought. Also, sometimes the book followed Hannah Arendt's line of thinking rather uncritically and did not seek to check if such is true. For instance, Arendt wrote a lot about Athens and there's no attempt in the book to engage that history, to see if what she's saying is true.