How does one stumble across a century and a half old young adult title such as this? One must be named Marty Reeder, first of all. But specifically? Well, first you have to look up some biographical information on Ewing because of a short story a student read and did a report on by her, then you find out that Rudyard Kipling was a big fan even to the point of nearly memorizing her work Jan of the Windmill. Wow! High praise from an author of significant renown himself! I hunted the book down and dove right in.
The first page had me hooked with what must be one of the strongest and most talented openings in a book I’ve read in a long time. From there the rest of that book was … well, it was good. I mean, it took me a good half a year to finish reading it as other books took precedence for a while, but I never found it a chore to read. Still, the fact that it was always Plan B, C, or sometimes all the way down to J, says something about my subconscious rating of the novel.
Jan of the Windmill captures the theme of pretty much 145% of all young adult British literature in any day and age from Oliver Twist to Harry Potter: an orphan with a mystery about his or her parentage. In this case, Jan is dropped off at a windmill as a baby and the recipients receive an allowance for raising him, but we do not know much more about his background. Through a slow process, we see Jan grow older and some bumbling and/or nefarious people try to cobble together his mystery for the reason of financial gain. Along the way we meet with some intriguing characters. Then we see Jan develop a natural talent for artistic endeavors. Eventually (and I mean eventually), trauma flares up, drastic events take place, mysteries unfold, resolutions come around, and everything wraps up like a good young adult British novel should.
I have no qualms with any of those things, the only problem I felt was that of the pacing. Most of the excitement happens in the last fourth or fifth of the novel. Everything before that unfolds at a luxurious and undemanding pace. The meticulous detailing of events in the majority of the novel compared with the rapid revealing of most of the main plot developments towards the end happened like a triple jumper after consuming too much caffeine--skipping, hopping, and jumping what should have received more attention than the vast majority of what precedes it.
Because of the melodramatic events towards the end, I found myself getting emotional in parts, though I still did not feel super invested. And when it was all over (with a closing chapter that nearly matches the opening in literary aesthetics), I was glad of the experience, but probably will not take another half a year to complete another novel of hers.
It made me wonder how I could not have enjoyed it more if it came with such high praise from Rudyard Kipling of all people. Then I thought about it more and asked myself what Kipling works I had read. Captains Courageous. Just So Stories. I mean, these were interesting and well written books, but I certainly did not find them narrative masterpieces. Perhaps, when you take a glowing recommendation from someone whose work you find just above mediocre, you should only expect just above mediocre results!