Oy. As with Ansky's "Pioneers," in two parts that GR jumbles into one entry, so here's a second fine mess. Tony Kushner's recent adaptation is not in the 1992 (Schocken), rept. 2002 (Yale) ed. by David Roskies, with not other tales of the supernatural, except the "Tower of Rome," but half a dozen stories, plus excerpts from the "Destruction of Galicia" which Ansky documented during WWI. These poignant eyewitness testimonies of the ever-recurrent antisemitic lies indulged in and perpetrated by various Christian and ethnic factions a century ago prove how enduring hate can be.
Roskies gives us a very in-depth introduction, as well as annotations and a brief glossary, necessary for Yiddish context. I think "At the Pleasure of the Enemy" (2017) offers similar material from the reporting Ansky did from front lines, pogroms, and prejudiced scuttlebutt, but I haven't seen that. I am under the impression that the four-volume source for Ansky's material here isn't extant now.
As for the original play, it kept my interest, but must have been a grand production and lengthy to stage indeed. The best story is "Behind the Mask," as its length and topic of scheming to spread the doctrines of secularism among traditional yeshiva-going boys, as in separately published (2014 Katz "Pioneers"--part 2; 2017 Waldman "Pioneers, The First Breach" tr., both recently critiqued by me on GR) installments of "Pioneers," reflects. This tale's better paced as it's longer, able to ruminate, and to follow a signature theme of Ansky, who'd been there, done that as to his own back-and-forth between advocating socialist revolution and rescuing the legacy that the Reds wished to end.
Fictions like "Hunger" evoke hardship well for the young scholars not "into" their tiresome Talmud routines, but the ending of that is sudden (not for the first time in Ansky, who sometimes has trouble keeping the momentum of his fiction steady). As with Peretz his mentor of sorts (I reviewed his anthology by Ruth Wisse), he is more adept at sketching shtetl life than developing characters, shading plots, or going into depth about motivations. For instance, "Go Tell a Goy" is little more than a tossed-off bagatelle. The others included are o.k., but frankly not that special or memorable.
So if you are looking for more dybbuks and demons, Roskies won't deliver, but the Kushner ed. will. Why poor Ansky gets his work shuffled about here a century after his untimely death is another nail in his coffin. Given the various spellings of his curious nom-de-plume only adds to confusion here.