How can we talk meaningfully about the past if it does not exist to be talked about? What gives time its direction? Is time travel possible? This defence of presentism - the view that only the present exists - makes an original contribution to a fast growing and exciting debate.
Some very useful insights on problems I had with RPP argument and presentism, but too much formal logic for me in this book, making it unreadable for non-philosophers. The good bits came after the first half of the book in my opinion.