A good and thorough study of the global migration of filipino domestic workers, highlighting how the purchase of the asset of domestic workers by class-privileged women ensures the reproduction of societies
Particular highlights include:
The international division of reproductive labour that describes Filipino women's migration and entrance into domestic work and the international transfer of caretaking in which migrants in the Philippines relegate their reproductive labour to poorer women unable to migrate i.e. women with means pay poor immigrant women of colour to help reproduce their family, and these women in turn transfer their care to women left behind in the Philippines
This demonstrates that production is not the only means by which international divisions of labour operate in the global economy; under globalisation, the transfer of reproductive labour also links nation-states
The popularisation of the term "care chains" has shone light on the issue, but has also eliminated the political-economic foundation of Parreñas' original analysis by narrowing the framework to the distribution of care and redirecting the focus away from reproductive inequalities; Parreñas thus makes a case against the misappropriation of the concept as a "care inequality" and call for the continued examination of the reproductive inequalities that the migration of domestic workers elicits among women and households across the globe
Parreñas also puts forward a case for using the term "reproductive labour" rather than "care" as she finds the latter to be an inadequate concept for analysing the inequalities constituted in domestic work; reducing the international division of reproductive labour to a "care chain" simplifies the concept, resulting in its misunderstanding, as the analysis of Nicola Yeates (2012) points out
Parreñas also suggests that rather than calling for studies on the care work of men, perhaps we need to document how the labour of migrant women not only relieves other women, but also provides "benefits to men, other family members, and society as a whole" (Duffy, 2005)
The aging of reproductive workers - recognising their reproductive labour - the work of caring, feeding, bathing, and clothing the population - requires that we acknowledge their reproductive rights, which not only refers to the right to a family life, but their right to retire
Their inability to retire, their forced loyalty and continued labour in old age, signifies a return to servitude in economic globalisation, the return of servitude signals the globalisation of a feudal order between employers from the Global North and domestic workers from the Global South
The crisis of masculinity - emasculation of male domestic workers does not necessarily occur in relation to female domestic workers but instead vis-a-vis the straw man of a traditionally masculine subject
The racism and class hierarchies - Employers often assigning tasks to their domestic workers that they would not want to undertake themselves, which enforces race and class hierarchies, as tasks that are unacceptable for employers are acceptable for domestic workers, most of whom are women of colour
The emotional labour (coined by Arlie Hochschild and referring to the expectation of employers to "produce an emotional state in another person" through "face-to-face" interaction) expected of domestic workers, such as disregarding their true feelings and carrying attitude reflecting the idealised environment of the home such as smiling and acting happy