What do you think?
Rate this book
Research Methods for Community Change: A Project-Based Approach
With an engaging, friendly style and numerous real world examples, author Randy Stoecker shows readers how to use a project-based research model in the community. The four features of the model are diagnosing a community condition; prescribing an intervention for the condition; implementing the prescription; and evaluating its impact.
288 pages, Kindle Edition
First published February 14, 2005
9 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
January 10, 2015
This is one of those I’ve-been-reading-it-all-semester-and-needed-to-read-the-odds-and-ends-to-call-it-officially-finished books. I have a lot of those. It’s academia.
Stoecker’s book reads like an accessible handbook for community organizations to use in determining how to approach research in the process of achieving community change and project goals. It asserts that “research” is something that we are already doing, and there are best practices for doing it, but that ultimately it comes down to situational specifics. It deals a lot with power/privilege dynamics, especially between community activists and academic “researchers” and the privileges of being an outsider coming into an organization to “do research.”
Stoecker pulls apart this traditional perspective, instead claiming that “research” is simply a process of diagnose-prescribe-implement-evaluate (repeat) that organizations are already doing, in order to achieve their goals. Research, he says, should always be supporting the project, which is trying to “create some difference in real people’s lives.” It draws on their experiences and indigenous knowledge and is creative and unique in its appearance and tactics.
Very cut-and-dry language, but honestly, this book is amazingly accessible and exceedingly helpful in giving activists and community organizers some different language to use to approach academics and funders and politicians, in order to describe what they are already doing as “research” and perhaps gain legitimacy, in addition to also breaking down the definition of “research” into one that is more open and helpful. It is very social-justice in a real “how will this make a real difference to real people” way.
I’d recommend this book for anyone going into work in a “community organization” and working for “community change.” It’s a useful “manual” and both helpful and quotable. There’s lots of real examples of how these techniques have been done well, and how they have been bungled and screwed up. There are appendices on strategic planning, “research ethics and the institutional review board,” writing proposals, and data resources, and some great sections on things like: “But I don’t do research” or “But I don’t do community work.” Seriously, pick this book up. Supremely useful. Anyone doing community informatics should also read this, especially if you aren’t familiar with Eubanks and Stoecker and doing CI in a popular education way. Shake up your conceptualizations of the digital divide and get some real change going on!
TL;DR – Accessible yet often academic “handbook” on achieving community change through a “project-based approach” to doing “research.” A must-have for community organizers and activists, and academics who are doing research or “community partner” work. Seriously, get this book.
Stoecker’s book reads like an accessible handbook for community organizations to use in determining how to approach research in the process of achieving community change and project goals. It asserts that “research” is something that we are already doing, and there are best practices for doing it, but that ultimately it comes down to situational specifics. It deals a lot with power/privilege dynamics, especially between community activists and academic “researchers” and the privileges of being an outsider coming into an organization to “do research.”
Stoecker pulls apart this traditional perspective, instead claiming that “research” is simply a process of diagnose-prescribe-implement-evaluate (repeat) that organizations are already doing, in order to achieve their goals. Research, he says, should always be supporting the project, which is trying to “create some difference in real people’s lives.” It draws on their experiences and indigenous knowledge and is creative and unique in its appearance and tactics.
Very cut-and-dry language, but honestly, this book is amazingly accessible and exceedingly helpful in giving activists and community organizers some different language to use to approach academics and funders and politicians, in order to describe what they are already doing as “research” and perhaps gain legitimacy, in addition to also breaking down the definition of “research” into one that is more open and helpful. It is very social-justice in a real “how will this make a real difference to real people” way.
I’d recommend this book for anyone going into work in a “community organization” and working for “community change.” It’s a useful “manual” and both helpful and quotable. There’s lots of real examples of how these techniques have been done well, and how they have been bungled and screwed up. There are appendices on strategic planning, “research ethics and the institutional review board,” writing proposals, and data resources, and some great sections on things like: “But I don’t do research” or “But I don’t do community work.” Seriously, pick this book up. Supremely useful. Anyone doing community informatics should also read this, especially if you aren’t familiar with Eubanks and Stoecker and doing CI in a popular education way. Shake up your conceptualizations of the digital divide and get some real change going on!
TL;DR – Accessible yet often academic “handbook” on achieving community change through a “project-based approach” to doing “research.” A must-have for community organizers and activists, and academics who are doing research or “community partner” work. Seriously, get this book.
March 4, 2019
Good book for understanding the purpose and importance of research in project management. His writing style is significantly better and more pleasant than other authors in this field. Good as a resource book and textbook.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews