BLACKBURN By Bradley Denton MY REVIEW 2 STARS**
I purchased this book on January 10th of this year and it has the dubious distinction of being the first novel I read in the year 2018. BLACKBURN was first published in 1993--- in the fall of this past year I had been perusing assorted lists of recommendations for "serial killer thrillers". Initially I had been working my way through SERIAL KILLER NOVELS: 10 OF THE BEST a somewhat dated posting on Britain's Crime Lover Fiction.com site. It listed Silence Of The Lambs by Thomas Harris, so I plucked a few selections out of the list that were completely unfamiliar to me. A few were outstanding but alas, the list turned out to be a "mixed bag". I later spent time on different sites, and ran into a reference that heaped boundless praise upon a novel penned 25 years ago entitled simply "BLACKBURN". The description of the book piqued my interest.
I located the novel on Amazon. There were a total of 25 Reviews for the book, and when one considers that this novel was first published a quarter of a century ago, that is NOT an unimpressive number. More surprising still was the Rating 4.4 Out of 5-Stars (with 88% 5-Stars and another 4% 4-Stars) --- quality reviews according to Fakespot.
I read many of the overwhelmingly positive reviews and a few facts quickly emerged: this novel has garnered a fanatical fan base, and I would not stop short at calling this book a cult classic.
I am writing much more than I planned to for this review. However, frankly BOTH the academic and visceral reaction to this novel are fascinating. The visceral reactions are manifested by a compulsive need to re-read or reacquaint one's mindset with the novel, i.e., reviews such as:
"want to re-read"..."I am getting ready to read it for the 3rd time"..."I have returned to it, and will continue to do so"..."I read this book about 5 years ago and scenes from it still crop up in my mind out of the blue..."
Gut-level reactions also appear to be empowering the book as a bible of sorts to guide us in our daily lives, such as the book
"will change you. Once you've read it, you will never see the world the same way again. This is one of those books you will never forget"... "Blackburn, the Novel, will change your life. Do yourself a favor. Buy it, read it. Today."... "a modern-day parable illustrating the shades of good and evil and the meanings of life"
Then somewhere between a visceral and an academic response we have a bestowing of the highest accolades, and even canonizing the character in the book and/or the author, as exemplified by such reviews as:
" a true American classic", " It has no parallel in fiction, in my opinion", "BLACKBURN is an American classic" "a modern classic that deserves a much wider audience", and "...a masterpiece" "One of my all time favorite books, Should be made into a film.."
And then the academics had their say, to include my personal favorites
"a striking depiction of middle-American despair, betrayed innocence, and transcendent hope".
[and] " This is an exceptional novel, at once riotously funny and searingly potent: a vision of America through the eyes of the central bogeyman of our culture."
Speaking of "riotously funny" this too, was a recurring theme in the readers who shared their experiences, as evidenced by such declarations as: "surprisingly funny"..."... this is a very, very funny book...", and ""You literally blurt out roaring, uncontrollable laughter..."
...one reviewer wrote (and I kid you not):
" I read Blackburn, the Novel, over a year ago but did not write a review then because I feared I could not do it justice."
I do not foresee any need to delay in putting my thoughts about BLACKBURN to paper and posting my review in well, lets say, considerably less time than "over a year..."
I read an interview with the author (Bradley Denton) at which time he was questioned about the novel BLACKBURN. He was questioned about the fact that after Jeff Lindsay’s DEXTER books came out a number of years later some commentators had opined that the character of Jimmy Blackburn was actually "the first fictional serial killer who only killed those who deserved it". It is significant (to me) that Denton denied that Jimmy WAS a "serial killer" and qualified his opinion by noting that Jimmy killed only because of his "hyper developed sense of right and wrong".
So (as Hannibal would say) "Okey-Dokey. Here we go". 1-The fictional character of Jimmy Blackburn is most assuredly a "serial killer". Throughout the book, he murders people with gay abandon. Perhaps the most memorable encounter in the novel is when a young impressionable Jimmy meets an evangelist at his school. The blind preacher is attempting to sway the youngsters by not only his words, but also by utilizing some clever theatrics. Jimmy accidentally discovers the holy man's duplicity and manages to grievously injure the man for his actions. Later as a young man Jimmy chains a married couple in the crawl space under their house because of their failure to pay him for a job he done for them. However, most of the men who violate his sense of "right" end up dead. His multiple victims range from a con man selling encyclopedias to dishonest mechanics ripping off their customers. Jimmy also draws a line in the sand for heartless men who take pleasure in killing innocent animals. Killing a cop in Texas who demonstrated a decidedly sadistic bent lands Jimmy in a whole heap of trouble. In all twenty (20) of his murders, only one (1) was legitimately warranted (the sexual predator/serial killer he accidentally encounters toward the end of the novel). Some may argue that the (more or less) assisted suicide of the escaped schizophrenic was appropriate, but no...it wasn't. 2-It is an insult to compare the fictional character of Jeff Lindsay's Dexter to Jimmy Blackburn. Dexter killed only murderers, and in many instances, men who were serial killers---those criminals who had escaped the jaws of the legal justice system.
I read BLACKBURN with admittedly some degree of interest. It was an "easy read" and not difficult to finish. It is difficult to say why the fictional character of Jimmy Blackburn gradually developed into a sociopath and a serial killer but "the abuse excuse" appears to jump right out atcha, doesn't it? I would add that if every boy who grew up in similar circumstances turned out to be a Jimmy, the population of serial killers would explode.
This isn't a "deep" book that only profound intellects can interpret, nor is the novel a book of prose that people should embrace as a guide to live by or a tome that depicts the meaning of life for cryin' out loud. Frankly, I have taken dishonest business people to court, and I freely admit that if it were left up to me, I would have EVERY animal abuser on this planet to change places with the poor creature they neglected or treated cruelly. There is a "special place in Hell for animal abusers...and for abusers of children and the elderly for that matter, but it is not my place to make sure their tickets are punched. It wasn't Jimmy Blackburn's either.
I saw nothing transcendent about this book whatsoever. I would love to get my money back. It just simply amazes me what kind of literature can carve out a piece of immortality for a chunk of humanity.
.