I'm generally a cheerful optimist and jump at the chance to encourage, but I do use my one-star reviews for books that need to be set on fire and flung into a canal and/or back into the 1700s.
Spot the difference:
'... to treat any of these as if they were less than a child of God is to deny the validity of one's spiritual existence.'
~ Archbishop Desmond Tutu
vs ...
'... thus we can assert with assurance, that a woman's rights over her own body are non-existent.'
~ Harry Blamires
'The post-Christian mind dare not face facts.'
~ Harry Blamires
'We are in a post-Christian world, a world of self-deceiving psychobabblers from whose minds the moral laws of a whole civilisation have been swept away.'
~ Harry Blamires
'... the way the adolescent who keeps a feverish eye on the pop charts can develop into the classical music enthusiast when taste matures and childish things are put away.'
~ Harry Blamires
... ... so yes, it is a painful read. If you want to misuse scripture to excuse your miserable git-ishness and abundant misogyny, you probably can, but you'll have to squint a bit when you get to the parts about what God's like, or what Jesus actually said - which is probably why there's almost no external citations or biblical references made. Bit awkward.
I'd go further than the person who gave it a very eloquent two-star review; misogyny, generalisation, rants upon rants, it reeks of an academic building justifications for never having to step outside of their university gates. The dreaded 'them' are everywhere in this book. The unwashed, unshaven, frankly incorrect 'them' who are to blame for everything and should be dishonoured at every turn ... apparently. Just as ... Jesus ... did? No, perhaps not.
'I am writing a book about correcting slovenly thinking.'
~ Harry Blamires
... I think Mr Blamires may really have been writing a book about being judgemental. And it has been published and distributed by SPCK.