What do you think?
Rate this book


272 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2004
Native cultures were not fixed and timeless edifices, ready to crumble on first exposure to Europe's transatlantic thrust. Rather, they were historically evolving societies that had known centuries of change, not to mention periodic upheavals—the most significant one we know of in the case of the Iroquois being the adoption of agriculture around A.D. 1000—long before the time of Columbus. As in the past, Mohawks of the seventeenth century adopted products, ideas, and techniques from the outside world; they adopted human beings from neighboring nations, too; and the technology, like the people, was integrated into their society. Inevitably their culture changed in the process, but it was neither eradicated nor replaced by a foreign culture. There is no denying the fact that the Mohawks of Tekakwitha's day lived through major crises and that their customs and outlook were profoundly affected by the colonial presence. But, then, Europeans in America were also transformed through contact with native societies. Our understanding of these processes is badly skewed if we think in terms of a zero-sum 'contest of cultures,' with Indian civilization falling victim to a triumphant Euro-American culture. The language of 'layering' and 'interpenetration' or, to borrow Natalie Davis's vocabulary, the 'braiding' of cultures, better serves us. With a renewed conceptual apparatus of this sort, we can hope to come to terms with the continuity of Mohawks and Iroquois culture through all the shocks and ruptures of the seventeenth and subsequent centuries and down to the present day.
The bibliographic description on the reverse side of the title page of Mohawk Saint includes two subject headings that include the term biography. Allan Greer wrote an excellent monograph that probes the lives of Catherine Tekakwitha, Claude Chauchetière, and Pierre Cholenec. The term biography is a rather limiting term, in that it implies a study of these individuals within history. Rather, Mohawk Saint is a microhistory, because, as Jill Lepore argues, this genre will “will always draw the writer's, and the reader's, attention away from the subject and toward the culture.” (Jill Lepore, “Historians Who Love Too Much: Reflections on Microhistory and Biography” in The Journal of American History 88 no. 1 (Jun., 2001), 142.) In the introduction, Greer makes it clear that the goal is not just to weave a narrative about Tekakwitha, but also to craft a history of what it was like to live through the upheavals of the early North American colonies. For Greer, this work becomes a microhistory because an understanding of the cultural surroundings is just as important, if not more important, than an understanding of the primary actors.(Greer, iv, viii, ix.) Greer accomplishes this by examining hagiographies and multi-disciplinary works in order to examine the religious lives of Tekakwitha and Chauchetière within the context and in order to better understand the collision of European and Native American cultures.
Greer's first goal in Mohawk Saints was to explore the religious lives of both Tekakwitha and Chauchetière. The work explores more than the contact between Tekakwitha and Chauchetière, but also explores the religious and spiritual construction of the two. Greer argues that, for Chauchetière, “under the surface of this rather ordinary missionary career, the spiritual autobiography reveals a truly remarkable inner life.”(Ibid, 61.) The author explains to the reader how the individuals developed spiritually within the accepted norms of their culture, and yet, how they were exceptional. Chauchetière was constructed as a mystic who sought to do battle with himself while doing the Lord's work. By using Chauchetière's own writings to provide the analysis, the author is able to describe how he viewed himself. This construction is compelling because it illustrates how Chauchetière viewed the world, yet also how his views of the world were created by the Order in which he lived. Greer's telling of Tekakwitha's story is similar because it explores her religious construction within the context of society. The author is required to deconstruct the documents written about Tekakwitha: “the process of constructing a historical biography on the basis of hagiography has required us to counteract the sources' tendency to treat Tekakwitha as an alien presence in the land of her birth.”(Ibid, 57.) Because Greer is using Chauchetière's and Cholenec's writings, he must cope with the knowledge that hagiography is biased towards the views of the Jesuits, who had an agenda in trying to canonize Catherine Tekakwitha. Greer attempts to undertake literary analysis of these works in order to examine these works within their traditional convention and within the context of Jesuits in New France. This analysis provides insight into the life of Tekakwitha, but it also provides a means to analyze the Jesuit views of Mohawk and Iroquois society, while also shedding light onto how the indigenous people viewed the Europeans.
Greer notes in the introduction that “if historians need ... to make themselves into anthropologists to study Indians of an earlier age, they must do something similar in examining the Europeans who contacted them.”(Ibid, x.) While Greer is crafting the story of Chauchetière and Tekakwitha, he also attempts to compare the Iroquois and European cultures through the major incidents in the lives of Tekakwitha and Chauchetière. Several major themes are the focus of the chapters of Mohawk Saint, including views of death and dying, constant change, mysticism, the body corpus with respect to mysticism, and views of community. In each of these chapters, Greer follows the advice laid out in the introduction in order to examine these issues. By analyzing the two sets of beliefs together, Greer constructs a comparative view that can further enlighten the reader to customs, practices and beliefs of each culture. Despite the differences made clear by the author, he attempts to bring the cultures together to show that they had similarities as well. Greer argues that the use of spiritualism, mysticism, and ritual acts as a bridge between the cultures. In Kahnawake, “religion served as a medium through which internal belonging and external affiliation were negotiated,” with the multitude of residents at this site would have seen human existence as bounded by the spiritual and incorporeal, which, as Greer believes, creates a link.(Ibid, 99-100; 105.) Because Mohawk Saint uses more than the 'traditional' historical sources and branches into a cross-disciplinary exploration of culture, Greer is able to successfully paint a picture of how religious belief in Mohawk and Iroquois culture intersected with European Christianity.
By looking at individuals within a larger societal context, Greer analyzes how individuals differ from the norm, but also illustrates the beliefs of two sets of people within a period of great flux. As Jill Lepore notes, microhistory uses an exemplary individual as a method for exploring a greater historical question or culture.(Lepore, 133.) By exploring the lives of Catherine Tekakwitha and Claude Chauchetière, Allan Greer is able to explore the spiritual views of two cultures meeting in the American north-east through the analysis of how these individuals were constructed. Because Greer views the past as a foreign culture, Mohawk Saint is able to construct a vivid microhistory describing remarkable individuals, and thus the creating specific examples of how the two colliding cultures viewed religion and mysticism.