Normally I don't review books here, but this one makes me ask a Question for Class Discussion. the narrator of th' book is Jewish, a distractable-but-good kid who's parents are disapointed in him cuz, let's face it, he's a kid and easily bored (he makes faces and falls off his chair during a worship service, for example). Tis th' time of Yom Kippur and he's feeling a lil' down about his ability to always be as good as he knows he's expected to be.
Now, the Jewish custom of Kapparot, or "kapores" in this book (I'm not Jewish nor a scholar of those sacred texts, so I can't say if there's a significant difference between the words/spelling) is upon them when the story tells us that a live chicken is swung over a persons head to essentially remove sin (the story is not a religious text at heart, so it's not explained in such terms). The chickens themselves are tired of this and go on strike by leaving the area and refusing to participate.
What the author does NOT speak about is that, from what I've read and researched, kapporot involves the transfer of sin from the person to the chicken, which is then ritually slaughtered. No chickens were harmed in the telling of this story. What's more is that the book begins and ends with the phrase "customs come and customs go..." which implies that the author doesn't believe in animal sacrifice, and seems to be hinting to the reader that this practice is outdated.
so, to me it's a bit of a confusing book-- I'm trying to find out what exactly was the author's subtext. If you're a non-Jew or Reform and don't practice kappores, and you've never heard of it you might get curious an' lookit upp and find out that there's an important part to this ritual that is left out of the telling. Why was that?? If the author's intent was to basically say "lets stop doing this" then why not tell all of it? (or if there's a reformist movement to NOT kill the chicken, then why not reflect that in the narrative as well?) Or is that crossing a line somehow-- the way PETA protestors will toss buckets of blood on people to protest the slaughter of animals for food?