What do you think?
Rate this book
New Answers Book #3
New Answers Book Volume 3
The newest title in this best-selling series compiled by Ken Ham, leading a powerful group of contributors to answer some of the most compelling questions of science and the Bible. From the outer edges of the known universe to the moment life begins, this continuing collection of answers will make an incredible impact on your life and your personal journey of faith.
385 pages, ebook
First published February 1, 2010
65 people are currently reading
452 people want to read
About the author
Ken Ham
232 books353 followersDr. Ken Ham is the president of Answers in Genesis USA and is a well-known speaker and author on the subject of Young-Earth Creationism. He received a bachelor degree in applied science (emphasis on environmental biology) from the Queensland Institute of Technology, and a Diploma of Education from the University of Queensland. He has also received two honorary doctorates: a Doctor of Divinity from Temple Baptist College, and a Doctor of Literature from Baptist Liberty University.
He was a director of Creation Science Foundation (CSF) in Australia, an organization which he jointly founded with John Mackay. In 1987 he moved to the United States, still maintaining his links with CSF.
From 1987 to 1993, Ham worked for the Institute for Creation Research, and in 1994 set up what in 1995 became Answers in Genesis (AiG), a creation ministry dedicated to "upholding the authority of the Bible from the very first verse."
In 2008 Ham was described by well known atheist and evolutionary biologist PZ Myers as a "Wackaloon" for carrying out a prayer session with members of the Pentagon. Ham responded regarding the validity of that prayer breakfastand that PZ Myers and other critics were intolerant of his position.
He was a director of Creation Science Foundation (CSF) in Australia, an organization which he jointly founded with John Mackay. In 1987 he moved to the United States, still maintaining his links with CSF.
From 1987 to 1993, Ham worked for the Institute for Creation Research, and in 1994 set up what in 1995 became Answers in Genesis (AiG), a creation ministry dedicated to "upholding the authority of the Bible from the very first verse."
In 2008 Ham was described by well known atheist and evolutionary biologist PZ Myers as a "Wackaloon" for carrying out a prayer session with members of the Pentagon. Ham responded regarding the validity of that prayer breakfastand that PZ Myers and other critics were intolerant of his position.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews
June 9, 2010
"The New Answers Book 3" is a collection of 38 articles written by 24 people on topics related to the Bible, mostly covering questions that critics of the Bible and of biblical accuracy would ask. This book teaches Christians how to more effectively argue for the accuracy of the Bible.
Each chapter was an article that covered a different topic. Some of these topics overlapped a bit, so some foundational information was briefly repeated by several authors in their different articles. However, it was information worth repeating. Most of the articles--even the slightly more technical articles--were written at a level that a teenager could easily understand. However, a few of the articles assumed the reader knew some basic, technical terms and used them without defining them. I had no trouble following those articles, but I took a lot of science classes in college. There were black and white illustrations for each article.
I found the book interesting and, overall, the arguments were easy to follow. The majority of the articles had strong arguments and were well-supported. A few of them could have been stronger, in my opinion, but part of the problem was the limited space. The answers couldn't be comprehensive, so they gave as much information as most Christians would probably care to know.
I'd recommend this book to Christians who want to be able to better answer critical questions about the Bible and to those who genuinely want to learn the answers to any of the questions covered.
The articles: Where was the Garden of Eden located? What did Noah's Ark look like? Should Christians be pushing to have creation taught in government schools? What are "kinds" in Genesis? How could Noah fit the animals on the ark? Was the Flood of Noah global or local in extent? Is man the cause of global warming? Did Bible authors believe in a literal genesis? Do fossils show signs of rapid burial? What about the similarity between human and chimp DNA? Was there death before Adam sinned? Abortion: Is it really a matter of life and death? Is the Christian Worldview logical? What about cloning and stem cells? How old does the earth look? Does Evolution have a...chance? (i.e. the probability of it) What about Eugenics and Planned Parenthood? When and how did the Grand Canyon form? Does astronomy confirm a young universe? How could fish survive the Genesis Flood? What about cosmology? Did life come from outer space? Did the continents split apart in the days of Peleg? Vestigial organs--evidence for Evolution? Is Tiktaalik Evolution's greatest Missing Link? Why is Mount St. Helens important to the origins controversy? What is the best argument for the existence of God? Do Evolutionists believe Darwin's ideas about Evolution? What are some of the best Flood evidences? What are some good questions to ask an Evolutionist? What about bacteria? Unicorns in the Bible? Doesn't the Bible support slavery? Why did God make viruses? Wasn't the Bible written by mere men? Isn't the God of the Old Testament harsh, brutal, and downright evil? Who sinned first--Adam or Satan? How can someone start a new life in Christ?
I received this book as a review copy from the publisher.
Each chapter was an article that covered a different topic. Some of these topics overlapped a bit, so some foundational information was briefly repeated by several authors in their different articles. However, it was information worth repeating. Most of the articles--even the slightly more technical articles--were written at a level that a teenager could easily understand. However, a few of the articles assumed the reader knew some basic, technical terms and used them without defining them. I had no trouble following those articles, but I took a lot of science classes in college. There were black and white illustrations for each article.
I found the book interesting and, overall, the arguments were easy to follow. The majority of the articles had strong arguments and were well-supported. A few of them could have been stronger, in my opinion, but part of the problem was the limited space. The answers couldn't be comprehensive, so they gave as much information as most Christians would probably care to know.
I'd recommend this book to Christians who want to be able to better answer critical questions about the Bible and to those who genuinely want to learn the answers to any of the questions covered.
The articles: Where was the Garden of Eden located? What did Noah's Ark look like? Should Christians be pushing to have creation taught in government schools? What are "kinds" in Genesis? How could Noah fit the animals on the ark? Was the Flood of Noah global or local in extent? Is man the cause of global warming? Did Bible authors believe in a literal genesis? Do fossils show signs of rapid burial? What about the similarity between human and chimp DNA? Was there death before Adam sinned? Abortion: Is it really a matter of life and death? Is the Christian Worldview logical? What about cloning and stem cells? How old does the earth look? Does Evolution have a...chance? (i.e. the probability of it) What about Eugenics and Planned Parenthood? When and how did the Grand Canyon form? Does astronomy confirm a young universe? How could fish survive the Genesis Flood? What about cosmology? Did life come from outer space? Did the continents split apart in the days of Peleg? Vestigial organs--evidence for Evolution? Is Tiktaalik Evolution's greatest Missing Link? Why is Mount St. Helens important to the origins controversy? What is the best argument for the existence of God? Do Evolutionists believe Darwin's ideas about Evolution? What are some of the best Flood evidences? What are some good questions to ask an Evolutionist? What about bacteria? Unicorns in the Bible? Doesn't the Bible support slavery? Why did God make viruses? Wasn't the Bible written by mere men? Isn't the God of the Old Testament harsh, brutal, and downright evil? Who sinned first--Adam or Satan? How can someone start a new life in Christ?
I received this book as a review copy from the publisher.
February 27, 2018
Once again, Ken Ham, along with the other authors that contributed in putting together this book, did an excellent job at giving information for Christians on how to stand on the Word of God and how you can defend your faith and not only defend it, but respectfully go on the offense.
What I Liked: There are over thirty questions answered in this book and all of them I found to be helpful. Ken Ham and the others wrote about these questions in a way that is understandable and gives helpful knowledge.
I found that this book was very helpful to me, personally, and really encouraged me in my own faith in the Lord and how science matches with the Genesis record. I'm thankful for Ken Ham and all of the other authors who invested their time and resources in making this helpful source of information.
What I Didn't Like: There wasn't anything that I didn't like about this book.
I give this book 5 stars for an excellent resource book that not only equipped me with more information on how to defend my faith, but encouraged my faith, as well.
What I Liked: There are over thirty questions answered in this book and all of them I found to be helpful. Ken Ham and the others wrote about these questions in a way that is understandable and gives helpful knowledge.
I found that this book was very helpful to me, personally, and really encouraged me in my own faith in the Lord and how science matches with the Genesis record. I'm thankful for Ken Ham and all of the other authors who invested their time and resources in making this helpful source of information.
What I Didn't Like: There wasn't anything that I didn't like about this book.
I give this book 5 stars for an excellent resource book that not only equipped me with more information on how to defend my faith, but encouraged my faith, as well.
December 12, 2015
I didn’t like this one as much as The New Answers Book. Overall, my thoughts on this book are the same as The New Answers Book, so see that review. Only a few of the 38 questions deals directly with "evolution" (biological, geological, or cosmological). The others focus on the Flood, biblical interpretation and application, theological questions, biblical historicity and inerrancy, and cultural/moral implications.
The chapters are brief and written for laymen, but they include many references to longer papers and books for those interested.
You can read a few chapters online. Below are my notes.
Was the Flood of Noah Global or Local in Extent?
Was the Flood of Noah Global or Local in Extent? gives biblical, theological, and logical reasons why the flood couldn't have been local.
Did Bible Authors Believe in a Literal Genesis?
Old and New Testament authors and Jesus took Genesis 1-11 as historical fact.
OT: 1 Chr 1-8, Ps 33:6-9, Ps 104:5, Ps 19, Ps 136, Is 54:9, Ez 14:14-20.
NT: Mt 1:1-17, Lk 3:23-38, Rom 5:12-19, 1 Cor 15:21-22 & 45-47, 2 Cor 11:3, 1 Tim 2:13-14, 1 Cor 11:8-9, Rom 1:20, 1 Pet 3:20, 2 Pet 2:4-9, 2 Pet 3:3-7.
Jesus: Mt 19:3-6, Mk 10:3-9, Lk 11:50-51, Mt 24:38-39, Mk 13:19-20, Lk 11:50-51.
What about the Similarity Between Human and Chimp DNA?
"Emphasis on percent DNA similarity misses the point because it ignores both the magnitude of the actual differences as well as the significance of the role that single amino acid changes can play."
Similar "junk DNA" may actually be functional, or may be "genetic hotspots that are prone to the same mutation."
What Are Some of the Best Flood Evidences?
See also Worldwide Flood Evidence.
What about Bacteria?
"Only about 8 percent of the identified bacteria cause disease." Postulates that bacteria may have become pathogenic after the Fall, similar to the way plants developed thorns and thistles as a result of the Fall. See also Bacteria: More Good than Bad and Ugly.
Why Did God Make Viruses?
"...Some portions of DNA in animals that look like thy came from a virus...horizontal gene flow (genes picked up from somewhere in the environment rather than inherited from parents) may help to explain rapid adaptation and the interesting pattern of DNA in animals."
"Since viruses carry genetic material (DNA or RNA), they are the most logical agents to suspect in transferring genes. While horizontal gene transfer would not change the identity of an animal (i.e., it would still belong to the same kind), it could rapidly provide a source of genetic variability that allows for rapid adaptation. If this is the case, then viruses were created 'good' (as in Genesis 1) with a support role much like bacteria are known to have."
See also Why Did God Make Viruses?.
Isn’t the God of the Old Testament Harsh, Brutal, and Downright Evil?
Throughout the Old Testament, cases where people groups were killed in God's judgment had these elements in common: the people were sinning, God provided justice, and God provided salvation.
"In light of this, God should not be blamed, but those who were punished for their sin retain the blame, God did provide a means of salvation in each of these cases even though He was not obligated to do so."
"Consider the analogy of a person who steals and gets caught. When he stands before the judge, the judge finds him guilty and imposes a fine. But then the judge offers to pay the fine. Instead of accepting, the thief refuses and blames the whole mess on the judge who acted justly and even offered a way out!"
Doesn’t the Bible Support Slavery?
See The Bible and Slavery, especially the end ("A few pointers to remember").
The chapters are brief and written for laymen, but they include many references to longer papers and books for those interested.
You can read a few chapters online. Below are my notes.
Was the Flood of Noah Global or Local in Extent?
Was the Flood of Noah Global or Local in Extent? gives biblical, theological, and logical reasons why the flood couldn't have been local.
Did Bible Authors Believe in a Literal Genesis?
Old and New Testament authors and Jesus took Genesis 1-11 as historical fact.
OT: 1 Chr 1-8, Ps 33:6-9, Ps 104:5, Ps 19, Ps 136, Is 54:9, Ez 14:14-20.
NT: Mt 1:1-17, Lk 3:23-38, Rom 5:12-19, 1 Cor 15:21-22 & 45-47, 2 Cor 11:3, 1 Tim 2:13-14, 1 Cor 11:8-9, Rom 1:20, 1 Pet 3:20, 2 Pet 2:4-9, 2 Pet 3:3-7.
Jesus: Mt 19:3-6, Mk 10:3-9, Lk 11:50-51, Mt 24:38-39, Mk 13:19-20, Lk 11:50-51.
What about the Similarity Between Human and Chimp DNA?
"Emphasis on percent DNA similarity misses the point because it ignores both the magnitude of the actual differences as well as the significance of the role that single amino acid changes can play."
Similar "junk DNA" may actually be functional, or may be "genetic hotspots that are prone to the same mutation."
What Are Some of the Best Flood Evidences?
See also Worldwide Flood Evidence.
What about Bacteria?
"Only about 8 percent of the identified bacteria cause disease." Postulates that bacteria may have become pathogenic after the Fall, similar to the way plants developed thorns and thistles as a result of the Fall. See also Bacteria: More Good than Bad and Ugly.
Why Did God Make Viruses?
"...Some portions of DNA in animals that look like thy came from a virus...horizontal gene flow (genes picked up from somewhere in the environment rather than inherited from parents) may help to explain rapid adaptation and the interesting pattern of DNA in animals."
"Since viruses carry genetic material (DNA or RNA), they are the most logical agents to suspect in transferring genes. While horizontal gene transfer would not change the identity of an animal (i.e., it would still belong to the same kind), it could rapidly provide a source of genetic variability that allows for rapid adaptation. If this is the case, then viruses were created 'good' (as in Genesis 1) with a support role much like bacteria are known to have."
See also Why Did God Make Viruses?.
Isn’t the God of the Old Testament Harsh, Brutal, and Downright Evil?
Throughout the Old Testament, cases where people groups were killed in God's judgment had these elements in common: the people were sinning, God provided justice, and God provided salvation.
"In light of this, God should not be blamed, but those who were punished for their sin retain the blame, God did provide a means of salvation in each of these cases even though He was not obligated to do so."
"Consider the analogy of a person who steals and gets caught. When he stands before the judge, the judge finds him guilty and imposes a fine. But then the judge offers to pay the fine. Instead of accepting, the thief refuses and blames the whole mess on the judge who acted justly and even offered a way out!"
Doesn’t the Bible Support Slavery?
See The Bible and Slavery, especially the end ("A few pointers to remember").
December 14, 2011
Good information, but perhaps not as topical as the first two volumes in the series. Some of these chapters cover relatively obscure subject matter (i.e. Are There Unicorns in the Bible?) and others, such as the one on how Noah might have taken care of the animals on board the ark, are highly theorhetical in nature. Some of it is very technical, and a lot of it covers sciences, such as geology and biology, that are not particularly interesting to me. The biggest problem is that, because these articles are compiled by so many different authors, a lot of information gets repeated. I mean, how many times can you explain the different definitions of "evolution" in one volume? The chapter on "Didn't Mere Men Write the Bible?" is pretty much a total wash, and I wouldn't suggest making the argument that only God can disprove God. Asking people if they think they are God sounds pretty silly, as Ken Ham found out when he posed that question to Bill Maher, only to be later ridiculed at length about it. Still, there are some really good chapters, and it's definitely worth reading, especially if you haven't read the first two volumes. A very good book, but definitely check out others in the series first.
October 13, 2021
This third part of the Answers book set is just like the previous two. Well written and an easy format to follow. While some information can be over your head, it is all quite thought provoking and just plain neat. I would say the only hard part to these books is that it feels almost repetitious. Still, a good read and I learned new stuff!
August 3, 2021
En algunos temas, interesante. Aporta algunos datos importantes que desconocía. En su gran mayoría, militante y de perspectiva muy cerrada. Además, hay demasiados errores gramaticales, los cuales hacen que la lectura sea muy tropezada y cansada.
January 17, 2023
Honestly at this point I'm thinking if they took all the repetitiveness out of the books, they could easily condense it from 4 to 2. It's very tedious when each book just repeats what the previous ones said. That being said, the parts that were new I loved and learned a lot from.
August 16, 2020
Another very good book in the Answers series.
November 4, 2020
This book is not a dot to dot. But it's ok I had my moma read it to me
December 18, 2020
Great for a beginner but today the questions have changed a little. The critic now comes more prepared it seems.
February 14, 2022
There are four books in this series and every one of them is packed full if information in regards to God creating the universe in 6ooo years.
June 3, 2015
Review title: Third time feels tired; time to reboot
This is the third in a series of creationist answers to scientific and religious questions about origins (see Book 1 and Book 2), and by now the format feels old and repetitive. It is time for Answers in Genesis to consolidate the latest material into a single explanatory treatise that takes a systematic and logical approach to the topic.
Logic, by the way, is one of the most interesting key markers in the argument in support of the creationist position (see questions 13, 27, and 30)--without a law-providing creator, what is the source of logic? The problem (the existence of a universal ideal concept like logic) should be even more perplexing in the worldview of a evolutionary, atheistic, materialist--yet most assume and accept logic as a basis for argument!
But most of the questions and answers tend to repeat those already presented, while branching further afield beyond the topic of origins. Ken Ham and AIG, it is time to sharpen your pencils and write that textbook. In a way, after visiting the Creation Museum in suburban Cincinnati, I can say that you've already written it in sequence in the museum. Just encapsulate that in a single volume for those who can't (or won't) make the trip to the museum.
This is the third in a series of creationist answers to scientific and religious questions about origins (see Book 1 and Book 2), and by now the format feels old and repetitive. It is time for Answers in Genesis to consolidate the latest material into a single explanatory treatise that takes a systematic and logical approach to the topic.
Logic, by the way, is one of the most interesting key markers in the argument in support of the creationist position (see questions 13, 27, and 30)--without a law-providing creator, what is the source of logic? The problem (the existence of a universal ideal concept like logic) should be even more perplexing in the worldview of a evolutionary, atheistic, materialist--yet most assume and accept logic as a basis for argument!
But most of the questions and answers tend to repeat those already presented, while branching further afield beyond the topic of origins. Ken Ham and AIG, it is time to sharpen your pencils and write that textbook. In a way, after visiting the Creation Museum in suburban Cincinnati, I can say that you've already written it in sequence in the museum. Just encapsulate that in a single volume for those who can't (or won't) make the trip to the museum.
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews