I hadn't read one of the Ursula Blanchard series in quite awhile, and I wonder if that's one reason I enjoyed it more than some of the other Goodreads readers seem to have done. I enjoy the period details--accurate, where I'm able to judge--and the way that even minor characters such as Master van Weede have real personalities. And oh, my, can Buckley ever do suspense! Kidnappings, counter-kidnappings, runs for the border, oh yeah.
I love Ursula, even when she makes bad decisions. Indeed, sometimes I love her because she makes bad decisions. Lust overcomes good sense. Well, if I had an ex-husband (or is he?) like Matthew de la Roche, I might have the same problem! Handsome, witty, and capable of daring rescues, the man's certainly attractive even if his rescue methods are a bit cold-blooded.
For me, the reminders of who's who came in handy. I can readily see that they might be annoying to someone who's reading the series in more rapid succession. It's the problem that any long-running series faces: P.G. Wodehouse used to suggest that his constant readers go have a walk in the garden while he brought the new folks up to date. He would then do so with a neat little bit of exposition which you could skip if you really wanted to, though it was so witty that I never did. Current authors are strongly discouraged from doing this; slipping it in bit by bit is thought more natural. I'm not sure I agree.
I don't find Dale's jealousy repetitive. I think it's progressing. And I wonder what the author is going to do with that and certain other issues in the next book. We're getting close to the point where Elizabeth I was forced to overcome her reluctance to execute another anointed queen and order Mary Stuart's death.