What do you think?
Rate this book
La Revolucion Mexicana/mexico's Great Revolution: Memoria,mito E Historia/memory, Myth, And History
The 1910 Revolution is still tangibly present in Mexico and its people. This path finding book shows how Mexicans from 1910 through the 1950s interpreted the revolution, tried to make sense of it, and, through memory, myth making, and history writing, invented an idea called "La Revolución." This research clarifies how the revolution has served to authorize and legitimize politics today. Description in cien años después del comienzo de la Revolución Mexicana, este acontecimiento sigue siendo una extraña combinación de sucesos reales, mitos renovadores e historias inventadas por los gobiernos posrevolucionarios para narrar la historia del movimiento social más importante de América Latina en el siglo XX. De las historias y mitologías derivadas de la lucha armada nace la Tradición Revolucionaria, que toma forma en el festival anual, el monumento conmemorativo y la historia oficial. Todas ellas representan los distintos modos de organizar la memoria colectiva para difundir el pasado, realzarlo y revivirlo en el presente. En este libro se encuentran historias hasta ahora inéditas de los festivales anuales, como el que se realizaba el 20 de noviembre, que a partir de esto se eligió como Día de la Revolución Mexicana, o la insólita construcción del Monumento a la Revolución, que originalmente estaba destinado a ser el Palacio Legislativo. Esta aproximación a la historia revolucionaria y al desarrollo de las "historias oficiales" de la Revolución Mexicana llega hasta nuestros días en un momento de incertidumbre ideológica, en el que varios grupos políticos y gobiernos intentan modificar la Tradición Revolucionaria y con ello la esencia misma de la Revolución.
312 pages, Paperback
First published November 30, 1999
3 people are currently reading
61 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
January 1, 2014
Not knowing much of Mexican history, I was intrigued to read this book in the hopes that it might expand my knowledge of the topic. I did learn a great deal, though not exactly what I was anticipating. Not at all a retelling of the time period of La Revolucion, Thomas Benjamin has instead put together a well-researched analysis of the formation of Mexican national mythology, specifically relating to La Revolucion of 1910-1920. This was an extremely chaotic time in Mexico, as factions supporting charismatic leaders such as Zapata, Villa, Carranza, Madero, and Obregon vied for control over the direction of the country following the downfall of the Porfirio Diaz regime. Even after the deaths of their respective leaders, the factions remained deeply divided, preventing a unifying account of history and slowing the progress of the new government.
Benjamin explores how in the decades that followed, the ensuing regimes captured the idea of La Revolucion and turned it into a conciliatory symbol through the use of festivals, holidays, monuments, artwork and eventually official recounting of national history. This book is an interesting and scholarly examination of how a nation forms its national myths and traditions and how these are employed to cultivate patriotism and suppress opposition.
Benjamin explores how in the decades that followed, the ensuing regimes captured the idea of La Revolucion and turned it into a conciliatory symbol through the use of festivals, holidays, monuments, artwork and eventually official recounting of national history. This book is an interesting and scholarly examination of how a nation forms its national myths and traditions and how these are employed to cultivate patriotism and suppress opposition.
June 2, 2022
Important analysis, but overly broad. More historiographical theory than history
December 3, 2017
Benjamin's book examines how the armed conflict following the 1911 overthrow of Porfirio Díaz became "La Revolución." Specifically, Benjamin evaluates the interpretation of the ongoing revolution at three historical moments in three chapters – 1911-1913, 1913-1930, and 1920-1928 – and the institutionalization of the Revolution during the first half of the 20th century in the forms of festivals (the 20 de noviembre celebrations), monuments (the Monumento a la Revolución), and historical narratives (the writing of official histories), each allocated a chapter. An introduction and conclusion bookend these chapters and, helpfully, Benjamin includes chronologies related to the events of the Revolution and short biographies of the canonical Revolutionary heroes.
The novelty of Benjamin's sources (what he calls "minor political writings," see p. x) make the account compelling; focusing on the likes of pamphlets, event programs, newspaper editorials, and posters, and read by mostly "middle-class urbanites" (33), Benjamin effectively gives some idea of how these actors interpreted the Revolution even as it progressed. While I wonder about the rural and lower-class experiences of these events, Benjamin makes the bias of his sources clear and modestly hopes that the book will be "something of a stepping-stone, helpful in [future historians'] endeavors to take this subject further" (33). While I wouldn't fault the author for these exclusions, which he makes clear at the onset, I do wonder about the context for his sources. I'm not an expert in the field, so a few basic statistics – who was literate? Where did these writings circulate? How did these change over the course of the first half of the 20th century? – would have been helpful.
On the theoretical end of things, I would have been curious to see what Benjamin made of Trouillot's Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Many of Trouillot's concerns – the relationships between historicity 1 (what happened) and historicity 2 (what was said to have happened), the production of historical narratives outside the academy, the entry of silence into history not as an absence but as a necessary, power-laden constituent, and the like – square very well with the objectives of Benjamin's study. Regardless, it's a credit to the author that his interpretations of his evidence provoke these kinds of questions.
Benjamin writes with admirably clarity, and the organization of the book is logical (if slightly complicated, with all the chronologies included). The conclusion is also a helpful introduction to the more recent historiography of the Revolution.
The novelty of Benjamin's sources (what he calls "minor political writings," see p. x) make the account compelling; focusing on the likes of pamphlets, event programs, newspaper editorials, and posters, and read by mostly "middle-class urbanites" (33), Benjamin effectively gives some idea of how these actors interpreted the Revolution even as it progressed. While I wonder about the rural and lower-class experiences of these events, Benjamin makes the bias of his sources clear and modestly hopes that the book will be "something of a stepping-stone, helpful in [future historians'] endeavors to take this subject further" (33). While I wouldn't fault the author for these exclusions, which he makes clear at the onset, I do wonder about the context for his sources. I'm not an expert in the field, so a few basic statistics – who was literate? Where did these writings circulate? How did these change over the course of the first half of the 20th century? – would have been helpful.
On the theoretical end of things, I would have been curious to see what Benjamin made of Trouillot's Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Many of Trouillot's concerns – the relationships between historicity 1 (what happened) and historicity 2 (what was said to have happened), the production of historical narratives outside the academy, the entry of silence into history not as an absence but as a necessary, power-laden constituent, and the like – square very well with the objectives of Benjamin's study. Regardless, it's a credit to the author that his interpretations of his evidence provoke these kinds of questions.
Benjamin writes with admirably clarity, and the organization of the book is logical (if slightly complicated, with all the chronologies included). The conclusion is also a helpful introduction to the more recent historiography of the Revolution.
March 18, 2022
This book is great! Thomas Benjamin splits the book in two parts. Part one offers a historical context and the narrative created, and part two discusses how politicians used the Revolution to create a new Mexican identity by focusing on myth and memory. It’s a great book, but I was personally seeking a more detailed history of the Revolution itself, reason for the 4-stars. Still highly recommend!
November 15, 2021
This is a great book about how the Mexican Revolution is used, imagined, and interpreted by Mexicans through myth-making, memory, and official constructed narratives.
This is divided into 6 chapters.
Part One - the first three chapters are historic, focusing on 1911 - 1913 (Madero), 1913 - 1920 (warlords), and 1920 - 1928 (Obregón and Calles presidencies).
Part Two - the second three chapters are cultural and focus on 1928 - 1968 (and beyond), and are directed towards public festivals, monuments, and official textual histories.
Aside from the particular context of the Mexican Revolution, this book was fascinating by showing how history never just "is", it is constructed through a process of selective memory. Who are the heroes and villains, what is remembered and what is forgotten?
This is divided into 6 chapters.
Part One - the first three chapters are historic, focusing on 1911 - 1913 (Madero), 1913 - 1920 (warlords), and 1920 - 1928 (Obregón and Calles presidencies).
Part Two - the second three chapters are cultural and focus on 1928 - 1968 (and beyond), and are directed towards public festivals, monuments, and official textual histories.
Aside from the particular context of the Mexican Revolution, this book was fascinating by showing how history never just "is", it is constructed through a process of selective memory. Who are the heroes and villains, what is remembered and what is forgotten?
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews