heres my hot take: the fear of cancel culture or being canceled is a direct result of abusers pushing back against being held accountable for unacceptable behavior.
let me explain.
lundy bancroft makes it ABUNDANTLY CLEAR that abuse is not a result of psychological problems or trauma but a result of a persons entitlement to another persons time, energy, attention, and body. abusers are entitled. they are not broken, hurt little children who need our support. they need concrete and serious consequences to their behaviors. abusers have a logical mental throughline that determines their behavior. they are almost always entirely rational people who have weighed out the pros and cons of their actions. it is far more beneficial for an abuser to scream and throw tantrums and attack their victims because that is how they can get their way.
if youre unconvinced, bancroft uses several real scenarios to explain how abusers rule through fear. a family dinner where a daughter reminds her father to do the dishes that erupts in violence. the next week, everything goes completely normally, but no one reminds the father to wash the dishes. he simply gets up and walks away while everyone cleans up after him. a man who tearfully recounts blacking out in a rage and his partner confirming that he appears to be out of control and afterwards is full of remorse, but when pushed they both admit that he only breaks HER items, and that he never offers to help clean up. the abuser rules through fear and intimidation and the entire world supports this behavior.
if you do not cut an abuser off, if you do not tell him he is abusive, if you do not unconditionally support the abused, youre an abuse apologist.
after reading this im convinced all of these cases that people have insisted to me over my life were 'mutual abuse', like bobby brown and whitney houston, were just straight up abuse. oh but gabe, you say. bobby brown was mentally ill. he was a black man who faced many struggles with racism. but i would also respond that plenty of black men struggle with substance abuse and severe mental and neurological illnesses and also face the constant existential threat of antiblack violence, yet they dont have a near lifetime record of domestic violence. brown chose to abuse because thats how he got what he wanted from women. im using him as an example but i could easily use any other famous man who hides behind their mental struggles. in fact, bancroft says most abusers dont have any or very minimal mental issues, and that often their abuse can CAUSE their victims (including their children) to develop mental illnesses, which makes their victims to be less likely to be believed.
bancroft also adds that the supposed cultural differences between a gangbanger and a fundamentalist muslim and a rich white executive really dont matter all that much when it comes down to it because what causes someone to go from run of the mill casual misogynist is ENTITLEMENT. in speaking about how an abuser is formed he focuses a lot on pornography and white musical artists. bancroft touches on nonwhite and non north american abusers but i think he did that because as he said, cultural differences dont in themselves make someone abusive, adding that the only cultures that dont have abuse are tribal societies without class stratified gender roles i.e. societies where men and women are equal. he also probably wanted to speak directly to those who think abusers were the crude 'other' and not the boy next door in suburbia. on that note i think he does a good job because even today the cultural image of a domestic abuser is a nonwhite man or a working class white man beating his woman rather than the terrifying imposing figure of a rich white executive who terrorizes his family.
going back to his stance on pornography, i cant disagree with him. its not the act of sex itself that bancroft takes issue with. he doesnt even really seem to have an issue with consensual nonconsensual play or BDSM. what he takes issue with is the sexual violence and the easy access young boys have to it. like with eminem and guns and roses glorifying killing women, bancroft identifies pornography as part of a culture that supports abuse.
i know upon reading this a lot of people are going to tune out because porn is so hotly contested but i believe that erotic media/art is an intrinsic part of human society. its not that porn MAKES people violent, because otherwise everyone who watches porn would be deranged. its that porn, like any other media, takes its values from a society that already values abuse, and also, like any other media, influences society. its a feedback loop we see with things like blockbuster movies and netflix shows and anime. i am by no means a moral purist but because abusers use certain kind of media to justify their actions, it should be taken note of. and its not just porn--bancroft cites an abuser who played a guns and roses song repeatedly until his partner really thought he was going to kill her and bury her in the yard too. does that mean im against rock music? (im extremely against guns and roses because its a shit fucking band.) obviously not. does that mean im oblivious to how rock music has been demonized in the past and even today? obviously not! but i can be conscious of its impact, because We Live In A Society and You Are Not Immune To Propaganda.
thats essentially the entire book. why does he do that? because he feels like it. because he can. because law enforcement and therapists will back him up on it. because media tells him hes right. because his dad did it. abusers literally make the narrative. they say its because theyre mentally ill, because theyre traumatized, because theyre hurt, because she just makes him so fucking ANGRY, because he loses control, but its never because he wanted to. its never because he just fucking could, because he wanted to hurt her and control her and make her feel bad for scaring her. abusers want to mystify abuse as much as possible and for literal millennia, theyve done it. theyve sent their victims to be lobotomized, sent them to prisons, sent them to the grave. people like to say that it was legal to rape your wife in the US until the 70s but if you say your husband raped you today in 2021 theyll demand you prove it.
the way abusive men behave is calculating. they arent out of control. they know how to manipulate people and people are willing to be manipulated because fundamentally, we as a society fucking love abusers. we love protecting them. we hate victims. we hate seeing women 'exposing' a 'great' man because we think, well, he did so much! hes nice to me! shes just some fucking cocksucking lying whore trying to get all of his money! but you might even concede hes a little in the wrong and think, theyre abusing each other therefore shes still responsible but ultimately youre still putting the blame entirely on the woman.
there is a very famous case of a man being abusive to a woman that is playing out and people are spinning it as the woman being abusive to him. im not going to name either of these two people because his fans are INSANE and will spend months attacking me but what i will say is that the man always comes across as calm, collected, logical, but the woman always seems hysterical and crazy. this is why even after all the new 'evidence' of her doing 'crazy' things, i still believe her. i believe she did crazy things because he probably gaslit the fucking shit out of her for years. and the fact that i cant even say his name because his psychotic fans will harass me is proof that even putting a face and a name to an abuser, even demanding accountability and consequences to a man who has provenly been violent on video (smashing shit to intimidate someone IS ABUSE) proves that abusers TODAY IN 2021 have the upperhand. they are winning. they use terms like 'cancel culture' to prove that theyre victims when in reality they want to dodge all accountability and consequences. because if a victim is MADE CRAZY and ISNT PERFECT then shes ALSO abusive, and that is NOT how abuse works.
the reality is that society WANTS to support abusers. society LOVES abuse. society believes abuse is good and normal and if you are abused you are in the wrong and your abuser contributes more than you do by virtue of him being abusive. often this has a misogynist component but even in lgbt relationships, even when the dynamic of misogyny isnt there, i have personally seen communities rally around abusers and isolate victims because the victim dared speak out. you are the bad guy for wanting an abuser to face consequences. often, the consequence is that they not be invited to meetings or delete their social media. but because abusers are SO ENTITLED, they cant even do that! they cant even stay away from fucking twitter! theyre ENTITLED to use the internet even after raping and financially abusing their spouses and then attack YOU for saying they abused someone. you are a full on RAPIST fam, LOG OFF.
this was intended to be a review. but while reading this ive identified so many of my personal relatives as doing exactly these behaviors. im extremely angry that this book hasnt been translated into portuguese (at least not that i know of) because i think some of my relatives need to read this. and im angry. im angry that abuse is this thing everyone supports and turns a blind eye to not because its difficult but because theyre actually collaborating with the abuser. i dont think its that its hard to not support an abuser. i think its because abuse supporters are also entitled. theyre entitled to feeling comfortable. they dont like being challenged. their sons or fathers or friends are abusive? i dont want to know about it. im entitled to be safe from that. rip to your victims but im different. mostly because being associated with victimhood leaves you with a fucking stink that you can never wash off, that being victimized makes you weak and wrong and evil and bad, that you will never be a good enough victim for anyone to sympathize with. there were women in this book who were almost murdered by their boyfriends and had therapists and law enforcement essentially blame them and diagnose them as hysterical because the thought of looking into a crime (their literal jobs) was too difficult. it must be the cunt's fault for being hit.
im angry. this book was not easy to read. i dont think writing this will change anything. i do hope that if youre reading this review that you understand where im coming from with my original statement about cancel culture. sure there are instances of people taking things too far but if you abuse someone, the only thing that can stop you from doing it again is taking everything away from you. not sending you to prison. but making you feel like you fucked up. making you feel like youve got real consequences to your actions. remember, abusers abuse because theyre entitled to hurt others. not because theyre hurt or traumatized or mentally ill. its because they are entitled. stop making excuses for abusers and start making them afraid.